Trait completeness | 98% |
Total data | 290 |
References | 67 |
Author: Fabrice Téletchéa
License: All rights reserved
Trait id | Trait | Primary data | Secondary Data | References |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Oocyte diameter | 4-5 | 4.5 mm | Mellinger, 2002 |
1 | Oocyte diameter | 4-5 | 4.5 mm | Barton, 1996 |
1 | Oocyte diameter | 4-5 | 4.5 mm | Bruslé and Quignard, 2001 |
1 | Oocyte diameter | 5.06 ± 0.18 [Ovocytes] | 5.06 mm | Billard and Fremont, 1980 |
1 | Oocyte diameter | 3-5 [Not specified] | 4.0 mm | Ombredane et al, 2001 |
1 | Oocyte diameter | 4-5 | 4.5 mm | Scott and Crossman, 1973 |
1 | Oocyte diameter | 4.9-5.6 [Not specified, seems to be unswollen] | 5.25 mm | Mittelbach and Persson, 1998 |
1 | Oocyte diameter | 4.5 [Mean diameter of mature, fully yolked, ovarian oocyte] | 4.5 mm | Olden et al, 2006 |
1 | Oocyte diameter | Average egg diameter among 70 females of age groups I-IV ranged from 3.2 to 4.8 mm | 4.8 mm | Taure, 1976 |
1 | Oocyte diameter | Range: 3.64-6.94, mean 5.41 | 5.29 mm | Purtscher and Humpesch, 2006 |
2 | Egg size after water-hardening | 5.01 ± 0.80, n=778 [Eggs stripped from mature females, fertilized and incubated in water: hydrated eggs] | 5.01 mm | Bonislawska et al, 2001 |
2 | Egg size after water-hardening | The egg size at 2 days post-fertilization varied from 5.78 ±0.29 and 6.41 ± 0.28 | 5.78 mm | Vollestad and Lillehammer, 2000 |
2 | Egg size after water-hardening | 6.1 [Maximum egg diameter] | 6.1 mm | Coad, 2006 |
2 | Egg size after water-hardening | 4.25-6.56 [Smaller female (1.5 kg, TL 56 cm) produced small eggs: 4.25-5.4, while bigger female (weight 3.9, TL 79 cm) had much bigger eggs, with diameter about 5.75-6.56] | 5.4 mm | Bonislawska et al, 2000 |
2 | Egg size after water-hardening | Average diameter on the spawning area: 5.5 mm | 5.5 mm | Plasseraud et al, 1990 |
2 | Egg size after water-hardening | The mean length of maximum diameter of swollen eggs calculated for all females (n=40) ranged from 5.296 to 5.780 mm | 5.78 mm | Papala et al, 1998 |
2 | Egg size after water-hardening | Swollen egg diameter: 5.225 ± 0.327 (Rega), 5.100 ± 0.319 (Parseta), 5.149 ± 0.285 (Wieprza), 5.090 ± 0.287 (Grabowa) | 5.22 mm | Chelkowski et al, 1990 |
2 | Egg size after water-hardening | Range of diameters of swollen eggs of sea trout from Rega river at 4.5-5.45 mm. In this study the values found were 4.3-5.7 mm | 4.97 mm | Chelkowski et al, 1985 |
2 | Egg size after water-hardening | The collected eggs were submerged in water for hardening. […] The mean diameter of the eggs if individual females ranged from 4.08 to 5.85 mm, while in subsequent age groups the mean diameter of ten eggs ranged from 4.45 mm to 5.31 mm in four-and seven-year females | 5.85 mm | Bartel et al, 2005 |
2 | Egg size after water-hardening | Egg diameter mean ± S.D. : 4.57 ± 0.28 [Wild females] and 4.34 ± 0.16 [Farmed females] in 2002 | 4.57 mm | Randak et al, 2006 |
3 | Egg Buoyancy | Demersal [The female dig few nests] | Demersal | Bruslé and Quignard, 2001 |
3 | Egg Buoyancy | The eggs of Salmonidae are buried in unguarded nests called 'redds' and are demersal-nonadheive | Demersal | Kunz, 2004 |
3 | Egg Buoyancy | Eggs incubate under gravel or on other substrate in redd | Demersal | Goodyear et al, 1982 |
4 | Egg adhesiveness | The eggs of Salmonidae are buried in unguarded nests called 'redds' and are demersal-nonadheive | Non-Adhesive | Kunz, 2004 |
4 | Egg adhesiveness | Salmonidae, whose eggs are not sticky | Non-Adhesive | Woynarovich, 1962 |
5 | Incubation time | 239.4 [2°C], 117.4 [4°C], 54.2 [8°C], 33.8 [12°C] | 239.4 days | Jungwirth and Winkler, 1984 |
5 | Incubation time | 40 [10°C] | 40.0 days | Bruslé and Quignard, 2001 |
5 | Incubation time | 48-52 [10.6°C], 30-33 [13.9°C] | 50.0 days | Kerr and Grant, 1999 |
5 | Incubation time | 105 [4°C], 50 [8°C], 40 [10°C] and 30 days [12°C] | 105.0 days | Ojanguren and Brana, 2003 |
5 | Incubation time | 90.4 [5°C], 57.9 [7.5°C], 38.3 [10°C] and 26 [12.5°C] for 50% hatch | 90.4 days | Jensen, 1997 |
5 | Incubation time | 44-48 days at 9.8 ±1.1°C | 9.8 days | Ojanguren et al, 1996 |
5 | Incubation time | Mean number of days to 50% hatching was 50 at 8.3 ±1.1 | 8.3 days | Olsen and Vollestad, 2001 |
5 | Incubation time | Estimates of the number of days required for 50% of egg to hatch: 72 [5°C], 40 [10°C], and 29 [15°C] [In different populations: 49-69 [At 1.4-15.0°C]] | 59.0 days | Humpesch, 1985 |
5 | Incubation time | 148 [1.89°C], 122 [2.71°C], 95 [5.05°C], 46 [9.18°C] and 34.0 [11.24°C] | 148.0 days | Embody, 1934 |
5 | Incubation time | 50% hatch at 50 days at 8°C | 50.0 days | Luckenbach et al, 2001 |
5 | Incubation time | Number of fays from fertilisation to hatching 165 [At 2.8°C], 103 [At 5°C], 81 [At 6.6°C], 47 [At 10°C] and 32 [At 12.2°C] | 165.0 days | Gray, 1928 |
5 | Incubation time | Eggs hatch in 1-5 months at 57-35°F, usually in early February-early May | 3.0 days | Goodyear et al, 1982 |
5 | Incubation time | Mean number of days to 50% hatching was 50.5 and 50.4 for the allopatric and sypatric populations, respectively | 50.0 days | Olsen and Vollestad, 2001 |
6 | Temperature for incubation | 2-13 | 7.5 °C | Barton, 1996 |
6 | Temperature for incubation | Total losses occur at temperature as low as 12-13°C | 12.5 °C | Jungwirth and Winkler, 1984 |
6 | Temperature for incubation | Optimal 6.5, range 3-10 | 6.5 °C | Saat and Veersalu, 1996 |
6 | Temperature for incubation | Decrease from 7 to 4°C | 7.0 °C | Vollestad and Lillehammer, 2000 |
6 | Temperature for incubation | 1.4-11.0 is the temperature range for >50% survival to hatch [<1.4 and >15.5, lethal lower and upper limit] | 6.2 °C | Crisp, 1996 |
6 | Temperature for incubation | 10.6, also up to 13.9 | 10.6 °C | Kerr and Grant, 1999 |
6 | Temperature for incubation | Survival was maximal at 8 and 10°C and decreased at higher and lower temperatures [No embryo hatched at 16 and 18°C, which suggests an upper thermal limit for development between 14 and 16°C] | 8.0 °C | Ojanguren and Brana, 2003 |
6 | Temperature for incubation | 5-12.5 | 8.75 °C | Jensen, 1997 |
6 | Temperature for incubation | 9.8 ±1.1°C [Range 7-13, in reared conditions], maintained in darkness | 9.8 °C | Ojanguren et al, 1996 |
6 | Temperature for incubation | Incubation temperature was 8.3 ± 1.1°C | 8.3 °C | Olsen and Vollestad, 2001 |
6 | Temperature for incubation | The water temperature was maintained constant at 4°C during the experiment | 4.0 °C | Landergren and Vallin, 1998 |
6 | Temperature for incubation | The lower temperature limit at which brown trout hatched in laboratory studies was less than 1°C and the upper limit was in the range 10 to 16°C. Hatching success was optimal at about 5°C. In this study, although intra-gravel water temperatures rarely rose above 10°C during the egg incubation period, mean intra-gravel temperatures were above that considered optimal for successful hatching. | 1.0 °C | Acornley, 1999 |
6 | Temperature for incubation | Incubated at 10.3 | 10.3 °C | Bonislawska et al, 2000 |
6 | Temperature for incubation | Optimum temperature was about 5°C [The lower limit for hatching was < 1°C and the upper limit was between ca. 10 and 16°C] | 5.0 °C | Humpesch, 1985 |
6 | Temperature for incubation | Temperature fluctuated between 7.0 and 8.5°C with a mean of 7.9°C | 7.0 °C | Hansen, 1985 |
6 | Temperature for incubation | There were no significant differences in eyeing or to swim-up among the four strains at an incubation temperature of 7 or 4°C. However, at 2°C there was significantly lower survival among all four strains | 7.0 °C | Stonecypher et al, 1994 |
6 | Temperature for incubation | Incubation temperature was 8°C [The range of 4 and 8°C, which is optimal for early development of brown trout] | 8.0 °C | Luckenbach et al, 2001 |
6 | Temperature for incubation | Normal trout larvae can be raised from eggs incubated at any temperature between 2.8°C and 13°C without high mortality. Above 15°C the mortalityishigh | 2.8 °C | Gray, 1928 |
6 | Temperature for incubation | The water temperature during the experiments amounted to 10 ± 1°C | 10.0 °C | Sobocinski and Winnicki, 1974 |
6 | Temperature for incubation | All the spawn was incubated in stagnant water in vessels placed in a water bath at a temperature of 11-12°C | 11.5 °C | Cykowska and Winnicki, 1972 |
6 | Temperature for incubation | The full-sib families (intial number of eggs: 43-283) were incubated at a temperature of 8.3 ± 1.1°C (mean ± S.D.), using four tanks | 8.3 °C | Olsen and Vollestad, 2001 |
7 | Degree-days for incubation | 394 | 394.0 °C * day | Barton, 1996 |
7 | Degree-days for incubation | 350-420 [Water temperature about 10°C] | 385.0 °C * day | Bruslé and Quignard, 2001 |
7 | Degree-days for incubation | 400 | 400.0 °C * day | Ombredane et al, 2001 |
7 | Degree-days for incubation | From 425.6 to 437.3 | 425.6 °C * day | Vollestad and Lillehammer, 2000 |
7 | Degree-days for incubation | 325.5-452.0 [Between 5-12.5°C] | 388.75 °C * day | Jensen, 1997 |
7 | Degree-days for incubation | 410 | 410.0 °C * day | Bascinar and Okumus, 2004 |
7 | Degree-days for incubation | About 400 [Mean number of days to 50% hatching was 50 at 8.3 ±1.1] | 8.3 °C * day | Olsen and Vollestad, 2001 |
7 | Degree-days for incubation | 365-455 | 410.0 °C * day | Bonislawska et al, 2000 |
7 | Degree-days for incubation | 360 [i.e. 72 days at 5°C at ca. optimum temperature] | 360.0 °C * day | Humpesch, 1985 |
7 | Degree-days for incubation | 470 [Effective day-degrees] | 470.0 °C * day | Kamler, 2002 |
7 | Degree-days for incubation | Related to water temperature, the egg development time from fertilization to hatching ranges from 260 to 520 degree-days […]Duration of egg incubation of wild females and farmed females was the same (355-380 DD) | 367.5 °C * day | Randak et al, 2006 |
Trait id | Trait | Primary Data | Secondary Data | References |
---|---|---|---|---|
8 | Initial larval size | 15-25 | 20.0 mm | Bruslé and Quignard, 2001 |
8 | Initial larval size | 15-25 | 20.0 mm | Ombredane et al, 2001 |
8 | Initial larval size | 19 | 19.0 mm | Mittelbach and Persson, 1998 |
8 | Initial larval size | 14.5 and 16.2 [Size at hatching] | 14.5 mm | Vollestad and Lillehammer, 2000 |
8 | Initial larval size | About 13 [When eggs reared at 14°C] to about 16 [When eggs reared at 4°C] | 13.0 mm | Ojanguren and Brana, 2003 |
8 | Initial larval size | 15-17.5 | 16.25 mm | Olsen and Vollestad, 2001 |
8 | Initial larval size | 12.1 | 12.1 mm | Olden et al, 2006 |
8 | Initial larval size | 15 | 15.0 mm | Wurtz-Arlet, 1950 |
8 | Initial larval size | Range: 10.01-18.66, mean 15.55 | 14.34 mm | Purtscher and Humpesch, 2006 |
8 | Initial larval size | Based on graph, mosty between 15.2 and 17.5 mm | 17.5 mm | Olsen and Vollestad, 2001 |
9 | Larvae behaviour | The alevins stay in the gravel until the yolk sac has almost been absorbed | Demersal | Groot, 1996 |
9 | Larvae behaviour | Remains in the substrate until the yolk sac completion | Demersal | Ombredane et al, 2001 |
9 | Larvae behaviour | delayed, gradual dispersion after a passive phase | Demersal | Urho, 2002 |
9 | Larvae behaviour | Pre-emergent fry remain in the gravel until the yolk sac is absorbed | Demersal | Kerr and Grant, 1999 |
9 | Larvae behaviour | From hatch until two-thirds of the yolk sac was resorbed; this time intervalwas deliberately selected because from hatch until two-thirds of the yolk sac has been resorbed, the trout larvae, or -strickly speaking-, eleutherembryo, excessevely weighted by the yolk sac, stays immobile and close to the bottom and performs only slight movement in the water column | Demersal | Formicki et al, 2004 |
10 | Reaction to light | Photophobic | Photophobic | Bruslé and Quignard, 2001 |
11 | Temperature during larval development | 7 | 7.0 °C | Vollestad and Lillehammer, 2000 |
11 | Temperature during larval development | Survival between hatching and the end of the embryonic development was >80% in the range between 6 and 12°C and decreased sharply, to < 50% at 14 and 4°C | 80.0 °C | Ojanguren and Brana, 2003 |
11 | Temperature during larval development | Reared at 12.5 ±1.0°C | 12.5 °C | Ojanguren et al, 1996 |
11 | Temperature during larval development | 13 | 13.0 °C | Keckeis and Schiemer, 1992 |
11 | Temperature during larval development | Temperature fluctuated between 7.6 and 8.9°C with a mean of 8.5°C | 7.6 °C | Hansen, 1985 |
11 | Temperature during larval development | Mean water temperature in the hatchery was 8.9 ± 3.6°C during the period from hatching until the death of the last specimens | 8.9 °C | Randak et al, 2006 |
12 | Sibling intracohort cannibalism | It is probable that the smaller brown trout may be successful in picking up a few of the eggs of their own species | Absent | Greeley, 1932 |
13 | Full yolk-sac resorption | 800 [For emergence from the substrates] | 800.0 °C * day | Ombredane et al, 2001 |
13 | Full yolk-sac resorption | 561 to 752 [Degree-days, life span after hatching, without external food] | 561.0 °C * day | Vollestad and Lillehammer, 2000 |
13 | Full yolk-sac resorption | 650 [52 days at 12.5°C] | 650.0 °C * day | Ojanguren et al, 1996 |
14 | Onset of exogeneous feeding | 300-350 [About 25 days at 14°C to 75 days at 4°C] | 325.0 °C * day | Ojanguren and Brana, 2003 |
14 | Onset of exogeneous feeding | [At the commencement of first feeding, 35 days after haching at a temperature which fluctuated between 7.6 and 8.9°C with a mean of 8.5°C] | 35.0 °C * day | Hansen, 1985 |
14 | Onset of exogeneous feeding | After 91 days post-fertlization [50 days for incubation] at 8°C, embryos in the control had completely resorbed their yolk supplies and were feeding exogeneously | 91.0 °C * day | Luckenbach et al, 2001 |
14 | Onset of exogeneous feeding | Freely swimming fry, a few days after the yolk had been completely resorbed; the fry had already strated actively feeding and were behaving as fully formed organisms. The fry measured 25-35 mm | 30.0 °C * day | Formicki et al, 2004 |
Trait id | Trait | Primary Data | Secondary Data | References |
---|---|---|---|---|
15 | Age at sexual maturity | 4-5 | 4.5 year | Barton, 1996 |
15 | Age at sexual maturity | 3 | 3.0 year | Bruslé and Quignard, 2001 |
15 | Age at sexual maturity | 2-5 or 3-6 [Not well established] | 3.5 year | Groot, 1996 |
15 | Age at sexual maturity | 2 [Female] | 2.0 year | Ombredane et al, 2001 |
15 | Age at sexual maturity | 3-4 [Female] | 3.5 year | Fishbase, 2006 |
15 | Age at sexual maturity | 3 [31-36 months, age at maturation] | 33.5 year | Vila-Gispert and Moreno-Amich, 2002 |
15 | Age at sexual maturity | Average 3+ [Not specified] | 3.0 year | Kerr and Grant, 1999 |
15 | Age at sexual maturity | 3.0 [Both sex] | 3.0 year | Olden et al, 2006 |
15 | Age at sexual maturity | Females: Age I [16%], age II [77%], age 3 [88%] and age 4 [100%] | 16.0 year | Taure, 1976 |
15 | Age at sexual maturity | Spawning males were significantly younger 2+ and 4+ years, than females 3+ to 5+ years. The oldest female was 8+ years | 2.0 year | Rubin et al, 2005 |
15 | Age at sexual maturity | It matures at age 2 and 4 years and males usually mature one year earlier than females. | 2.0 year | Randak et al, 2006 |
16 | Length at sexual maturity | 40.6 | 40.6 cm | Barton, 1996 |
16 | Length at sexual maturity | 14.7 | 14.7 cm | Fishbase, 2006 |
16 | Length at sexual maturity | Most between 20.2-22.8 [Female] | 21.5 cm | Kerr and Grant, 1999 |
16 | Length at sexual maturity | 20.5 [Both sex] | 20.5 cm | Olden et al, 2006 |
16 | Length at sexual maturity | Nearly all females were mature when they are 304 mm long | 304.0 cm | Taure, 1976 |
16 | Length at sexual maturity | Between year 1969 and 1994, mean total length range from 61.2 to 72.5, and overall range from 40.0 to 91.5 cm | 91.5 cm | Papala et al, 1998 |
16 | Length at sexual maturity | Total length of the females spawning in Själsoänduring the season1992/1993 at 1999/2000, ranged from 185 to 890 mm (mean 572+/- 112 mm, n=238) | 572.0 cm | Rubin et al,2004 |
16 | Length at sexual maturity | The Lt of spawning females ranged from 185 to 890 mm. The distribution was unimodal for females with a mean +/- SD of 572 +/- 112 mm (n=283) | 572.0 cm | Rubin et al, 2005 |
16 | Length at sexual maturity | Length range of mature sea trout females (cm) in Pomeranian rivers: 36-91 (Rega), 34-93 (Parseta), 49-92 (Grabowa) | 63.5 cm | Chelkowski et al, 1990 |
17 | Weight at sexual maturity | Between year 1969 and 1994, mean body weight range from 2.1 to 3.4, and overall range from 1.2 to 4.7 kg | 1969.0 kg | Papala et al, 1998 |
17 | Weight at sexual maturity | The Mt of spawning females ranged from 55 to 8130 g | 55.0 kg | Rubin et al, 2005 |
19 | Relative fecundity | 1.54 | 1.54 thousand eggs/kg | Bruslé and Quignard, 2001 |
19 | Relative fecundity | 3.7112 | 3.71 thousand eggs/kg | Billard and Fremont, 1980 |
19 | Relative fecundity | About 2 | 2.0 thousand eggs/kg | Ombredane et al, 2001 |
19 | Relative fecundity | About 1.5 | 1.5 thousand eggs/kg | Coad, 2006 |
19 | Relative fecundity | 2 | 2.0 thousand eggs/kg | Kunz, 2004 |
19 | Relative fecundity | 2.054 Age 2] | 2.05 thousand eggs/kg | Plasseraud et al, 1990 |
19 | Relative fecundity | Relative fecundity of females in Czech brown trout populations ranges from 2000 to 3000 eggs.kg-1 | 2000.0 thousand eggs/kg | Randak et al, 2006 |
20 | Absolute fecundity | 1.5-4 | 2.75 thousand eggs | Barton, 1996 |
20 | Absolute fecundity | 1.789 ± 0.221 | 1.79 thousand eggs | Billard and Fremont, 1980 |
20 | Absolute fecundity | Average 2 | 2.0 thousand eggs | Scott and Crossman, 1973 |
20 | Absolute fecundity | 0.924-1.220 [Average number of vitellogenic oocyes of mature females in a single spawning season] | 1.07 thousand eggs | Vila-Gispert and Moreno-Amich, 2002 |
20 | Absolute fecundity | Up to 13.648 | 13.65 thousand eggs | Coad, 2006 |
20 | Absolute fecundity | 107 [Fewest for a female age I, 193 mm ] and up to 2419 [Age IV, 462 mm] | 107.0 thousand eggs | Taure, 1976 |
21 | Oocyte development | Group-synchronous | Group-synchronous | Rinchard, 1996 |
22 | Onset of oogenesis | May-June | ['May', 'June'] | Billard, 1987 |
23 | Intensifying oogenesis activity | From July until beginning of October | ['July', 'October'] | Billard, 1987 |
24 | Maximum GSI value | About 22 [October] | 22.0 percent | Billard, 1987 |
24 | Maximum GSI value | 20-22 [September-October] | 21.0 percent | Bruslé and Quignard, 2001 |
24 | Maximum GSI value | About 20% [mid-october, independent of the distance from the sea to the spawning site] | 20.0 percent | Jonsson and Jonsson, 2006 |
24 | Maximum GSI value | Mean of 18.5 (range 15-25.4) for anadromous population, mean of 12.9 (range 9.9-15.8) for resident population | 20.2 percent | Fleming, 1998 |
25 | Oogenesis duration | Ovulation did not exceed one month | No data | Billard, 1987 |
26 | Resting period | From January until April | 5.0 months | Billard, 1987 |
26 | Resting period | Almost 0 [From January until April] | 5.0 months | Billard, 1987 |
Trait id | Trait | Primary Data | Secondary Data | References |
---|---|---|---|---|
27 | Age at sexual maturity | 2 | 2.0 years | Bruslé and Quignard, 2001 |
27 | Age at sexual maturity | 1 [Male] | 1.0 years | Ombredane et al, 2001 |
27 | Age at sexual maturity | 1-3 [Male] | 2.0 years | Fishbase, 2006 |
27 | Age at sexual maturity | Most at 3 [No specified, but males attain maturity at an earlier age than females] | 3.0 years | Kerr and Grant, 1999 |
27 | Age at sexual maturity | 3.0 [Both sex] | 3.0 years | Olden et al, 2006 |
27 | Age at sexual maturity | Males: Age I [32%], age II [79], age III [93%] and age IV [100%] | 32.0 years | Taure, 1976 |
27 | Age at sexual maturity | Spawning males were significantly younger 2+ and 4+ years. The oldest male was 6+ years | 2.0 years | Rubin et al, 2005 |
27 | Age at sexual maturity | It matures at age 2 and 4 years and males usually mature one year earlier than females. | 2.0 years | Randak et al, 2006 |
28 | Length at sexual maturity | 12.5 [Male] | 12.5 cm | Fishbase, 2006 |
28 | Length at sexual maturity | Most at 17.7-20.2 | 18.95 cm | Kerr and Grant, 1999 |
28 | Length at sexual maturity | 20.5 [Both sex] | 20.5 cm | Olden et al, 2006 |
28 | Length at sexual maturity | Nearly all males were mature when they have reached 253 mm | 253.0 cm | Taure, 1976 |
28 | Length at sexual maturity | Mean natural tip length at maturity increased from 318 mm for those spawing at the river mouth to 434 mm at 40 km inland | 318.0 cm | Jonsson and Jonsson, 2006 |
28 | Length at sexual maturity | The Lt of spawning males ranged from 184 to 815 mm. The distribution was multimodal for males (n=232) with most frequent length classes 300, 400 and 550 mm | 184.0 cm | Rubin et al, 2005 |
29 | Weight at sexual maturity | The Mt of spawning males ranged from 56 to 6000 g | 56.0 kg | Rubin et al, 2005 |
30 | Male sexual dimorphism | Weak [See for details] | Absent | Coad, 2006 |
30 | Male sexual dimorphism | In Salmo, most Salvelinus, and most Oncorhynchus, a major sexual difference is found in the development , in normal breeding individuals, of elongated, hooked jaws with enlarged teeth.An upturned lower jaw is technically called a kype; an enlarged and often distorted upper jaw is termed a snout.Kype and sount development differs not only among individuals but also among species and conspecific populations: it is generally greater in stream-dwelling and anadromous forms than in lake-spawning or strickly freshwater forms.Kypes andsnouts are best developed in males, although females of some species also develop smaller ones. Another secondarytrait is a hump anterior to dorsal fin, found especially in males. | Present | Willson, 1997 |
30 | Male sexual dimorphism | Male bigger than female | Absent | Fleming, 1998 |
30 | Male sexual dimorphism | Once the large males, ('hooknoses', males which showed a kype on the lower jaw and Lt > 300 mm) entered Själsöan, they generally occupied a territory where they stayed. In contrast, small males ('sneakers', males without a kype on the lower jaw, and Lt> 300 mm) did not have any specific territorty and moved frequently up and downstream | Present | Rubin et al, 2005 |
31 | Onset of spermatogenesis | May-June | ['May', 'June'] | Billard, 1987 |
32 | Main spermatogenesis activity | From July until September, spermatogenetic activity was highest | ['July', 'August', 'September'] | Billard, 1987 |
33 | Maximum GSI value | 6 | 6.0 percent | Suquet et al, 1994 |
33 | Maximum GSI value | 5-6 | 5.5 percent | Billard, 1987 |
33 | Maximum GSI value | 4-5 [i.e. 1/5 or 1/7 of the RGS of female] | 4.5 percent | Bruslé and Quignard, 2001 |
33 | Maximum GSI value | Mean of 2.9 (range 2.7-3.0) for anadromous population, mean of 2.3 (range 1.9-2.6) for resident population | 2.85 percent | Fleming, 1998 |
34 | Spermatogenesis duration | Spermatogenesis is a very rapid process, about 2 months (or less) | 2.0 months | Billard, 1987 |
35 | Resting period | < 0 (April and May) | 3.0 months | Billard, 1987 |
Trait id | Trait | Primary Data | Secondary Data | References |
---|---|---|---|---|
36 | Spawning migration distance | The distance (km), which varies from 0.2 to 45 km, was measured from the mouth of the river to the spawning ground where the fish were caught | 45.0 km | Jonsson and Jonsson, 2006 |
36 | Spawning migration distance | The natural spawning grounds under study are in Själsöan, a stream located 7 km north of Visby, with a river basin are of 35 km² | 7.0 km | Rubin et al,2004 |
37 | Spawning migration period | Male and female migrations seem to peak between 7.6 and 7.8°C | No data | Kerr and Grant, 1999 |
37 | Spawning migration period | Anadromous brown trout spawning in large rivers, may enter fresh water some 6 months before arriving at the spawning areas, whereas brown trout spawning in small streams often ascend in a short period of time just prior to spawning | No data | Rubin et al, 2005 |
37 | Spawning migration period | Enter and ascend tributaries in late summer and fall, beginning in July; runs are often limited by low stream flow | ['July', 'August', 'September', 'October', 'November', 'December'] | Goodyear et al, 1982 |
38 | Homing | Homing is present | Present | Ombredane et al, 2001 |
38 | Homing | Salmon and trout tend to return from the sea to the river of their birth [Within the river system these anadromous fish and resident trout seek to return to their natal tributary to spawn] | Present | Crisp, 1996 |
38 | Homing | Return to their natal stream to spawn | Present | Landergren and Vallin, 1998 |
39 | Spawning season | October-January | ['January', 'October'] | Billard, 1997 |
39 | Spawning season | October-November until January-February | ['January', 'February', 'October', 'November'] | Bruslé and Quignard, 2001 |
39 | Spawning season | Late autumn to early winter | ['January', 'February', 'March', 'October', 'November', 'December'] | Groot, 1996 |
39 | Spawning season | November to end of february | ['November'] | Ombredane et al, 2001 |
39 | Spawning season | October to January, and up to March | ['January', 'March', 'October', 'November'] | Fishbase, 2006 |
39 | Spawning season | Start about October 15 and continue through early November, may extend into January | ['January', 'October', 'November'] | Scott and Crossman, 1973 |
39 | Spawning season | Spawn in autumn of the year | ['October', 'November', 'December'] | Kerr and Grant, 1999 |
39 | Spawning season | From mid-November to end of January | ['January', 'November'] | Terver, 1984 |
39 | Spawning season | Salmo and most char are fall breeders | ['October', 'November', 'December'] | Willson, 1997 |
39 | Spawning season | Brown trout were observed spawning at the study sites from mid October to early January | ['January', 'October'] | Acornley, 1999 |
39 | Spawning season | Winter spawner [Other authors described between September and January] | ['January', 'February', 'March', 'September', 'October', 'November'] | Humpesch, 1985 |
39 | Spawning season | December | ['December'] | Plasseraud et al, 1990 |
39 | Spawning season | Spawned in late October to early November | ['October', 'November'] | Crisp, 1994 |
39 | Spawning season | Peak spawning in mid-October | ['October'] | Jonsson and Jonsson, 2006 |
39 | Spawning season | The spawning season was from 3 November 1992 to 9 January 1993 | ['January', 'November'] | Rubin et al,2004 |
39 | Spawning season | September-January; usually October-November | ['January', 'September', 'October', 'November'] | Goodyear et al, 1982 |
39 | Spawning season | Reproduction of the farmed fish annually occurred in November, which was the usual period under conditions corresponding to this latitude | ['November'] | Randak et al, 2006 |
40 | Spawning period duration | 2 [0.50 months, length of breeding season] | 2.0 weeks | Vila-Gispert and Moreno-Amich, 2002 |
40 | Spawning period duration | 8-9 | 8.5 weeks | Terver, 1984 |
40 | Spawning period duration | From November 4 to November 25 [An individual may remain on the spawning grounds for a smuch as 25 days] | 4.0 weeks | Greeley, 1932 |
40 | Spawning period duration | The spawning period lasts for c. 3 weeks | 3.0 weeks | Jonsson and Jonsson, 2006 |
40 | Spawning period duration | Males usually entered the stream first and stayed longer, so the sex-ratio at the beginning and at the end of the spawning season was usually slanted towards males. Most of the females entered the stream and spawned the same or the next night. In contrast males tended to stay much longer in the stream (21.3% between 2 and 3 weeks) before spawning | 21.3 weeks | Rubin et al, 2005 |
41 | Spawning temperature | 1-10, 2-6, 7-9, 9-13 | 5.5 °C | Barton, 1996 |
41 | Spawning temperature | Below 12°C, the optimum is 5-6°C | 5.5 °C | Bruslé and Quignard, 2001 |
41 | Spawning temperature | 6-9 but may as high as 12.8 | 7.5 °C | Groot, 1996 |
41 | Spawning temperature | 6.7-8.9 | 7.8 °C | Scott and Crossman, 1973 |
41 | Spawning temperature | 6-9 | 7.5 °C | Mittelbach and Persson, 1998 |
41 | Spawning temperature | 6-9°C | 7.5 °C | Kerr and Grant, 1999 |
41 | Spawning temperature | 4 [Temperature at which spawning is typically initiated] | 4.0 °C | Olden et al, 2006 |
41 | Spawning temperature | 8-10 | 9.0 °C | Kamler et al, 1996 |
41 | Spawning temperature | When the temperature is falling from 55 to 44°F | 55.0 °C | Goodyear et al, 1982 |
42 | Spawning water type | Rivers [Rapid current, 30 to 70/80 cm/s] | Flowing or turbulent water | Bruslé and Quignard, 2001 |
42 | Spawning water type | Small streams at the head of riffle areas or on the downstream end of pools, where the gravel slopes upward [water freely flowing through the gravel and upwelling water, suitable velocities range from 15 to 90 cm/s] | Flowing or turbulent water | Groot, 1996 |
42 | Spawning water type | Water with current [Upper parts] | Flowing or turbulent water | Ombredane et al, 2001 |
42 | Spawning water type | Streams, headwaters | No category | Scott and Crossman, 1973 |
42 | Spawning water type | Water velocities of 0.204-0.814 cm/s | Flowing or turbulent water | Crisp, 1996 |
42 | Spawning water type | Riffles od sand and gravel beds | No category | Coad, 2006 |
42 | Spawning water type | Spawn in clear headwaters of large rivers and streams or in tributaries of lakes, also known to spawn over shallow reefs and shoals alog lakes shores, stream spawning fishes use riggle areas | Stagnant water | Kerr and Grant, 1999 |
42 | Spawning water type | Streams | No category | Landergren and Vallin, 1998 |
42 | Spawning water type | Large chalk stream | No category | Acornley, 1999 |
42 | Spawning water type | Spring streams, near sources of spring water | No category | Greeley, 1932 |
42 | Spawning water type | Mot of the streams were first order streams running directly into the sea | No category | Jonsson and Jonsson, 2006 |
42 | Spawning water type | Rivers [Rapid current, 30 to 70/80 cm/s] | Flowing or turbulent water | Papala et al, 1998 |
42 | Spawning water type | Fast water in headwaters or mid-reaches of cool, shaded streams; if denied access to tributaries, spawning occurs on shoals near stream mouths, or elsewhere along shore | Stagnant water | Goodyear et al, 1982 |
42 | Spawning water type | Trout selected slightly shallower and slower flowing spawning site (15-45 cm, 20-55 cm s-1) | Flowing or turbulent water | Louhi et al, 2008 |
43 | Spawning depth | 20-40 cm | 30.0 m | Bruslé and Quignard, 2001 |
43 | Spawning depth | 15-90 cm [Optimal depths are from 24-46 cm with the preferred depth arounf 31-32] | 52.5 m | Groot, 1996 |
43 | Spawning depth | Shallow | No data | Scott and Crossman, 1973 |
43 | Spawning depth | 0.15-0.91 m and 0.30-0.45 m given as "optimum" | 0.53 m | Crisp, 1996 |
43 | Spawning depth | Mean depth of 28 cm, min 10 cm and max 54 cm | 28.0 m | Plasseraud et al, 1990 |
43 | Spawning depth | Water depths at the spawning grounds were similar 20-30 cm | 25.0 m | Jonsson and Jonsson, 2006 |
43 | Spawning depth | To 4 feet | 4.0 m | Goodyear et al, 1982 |
43 | Spawning depth | 15-45 cm | 30.0 m | Louhi et al, 2008 |
44 | Spawning substrate | Gravels: 0.2 mm -2 cm [Lithophil] | Lithophils | Bruslé and Quignard, 2001 |
44 | Spawning substrate | Gravels: range : 0.3 to 10 cm with a preference for sizes 1 to 7 cm | Lithophils | Groot, 1996 |
44 | Spawning substrate | Gravels [Big pebbles >60 mm and sand <4 mm led to less survival] | Lithophils | Billard, 1997 |
44 | Spawning substrate | Gravels | Lithophils | Ombredane et al, 2001 |
44 | Spawning substrate | Gravelly | Lithophils | Scott and Crossman, 1973 |
44 | Spawning substrate | Banks of fine gravel | Lithophils | Crisp, 1996 |
44 | Spawning substrate | Gravel substrate: size preference to be 10 to 20 mm in diameter [If no gravel can be found, spawning is known to occur in areas of sand or hard clay perticles] | Lithophils | Kerr and Grant, 1999 |
44 | Spawning substrate | Lithophils | Lithophils | Balon, 1975 |
44 | Spawning substrate | Female spawners usually select clean gravel as spawning sites. The gravel composition chosen by sea trout, 210 cm diameter | Lithophils | Landergren and Vallin, 1998 |
44 | Spawning substrate | Gravel-beds | Lithophils | Acornley, 1999 |
44 | Spawning substrate | Lithophils | Lithophils | Kamler et al, 1996 |
44 | Spawning substrate | Gravels | Lithophils | Greeley, 1932 |
44 | Spawning substrate | Gravels: bigger than 3.7 cm are the most frequent | Lithophils | Plasseraud et al, 1990 |
44 | Spawning substrate | At some locations, especially in the lower sections, the substratum was dominated by fine sediment. These areas were never used for spawning. All the spawning grounds were exclusively lovated on clean gravel areas | Lithophils | Rubin et al,2004 |
44 | Spawning substrate | Spawning gravel | Lithophils | Rubin et al, 2005 |
44 | Spawning substrate | Eggs are deposited in redd dug in clean, coarse gravel and rubble or in firm sand or hard play if gravel not available | Lithophils | Goodyear et al, 1982 |
44 | Spawning substrate | Salmo and trout preferred pebbles (16-64 mm) fpr spawning | Lithophils | Louhi et al, 2008 |
44 | Spawning substrate | Gravel bed | Lithophils | Meyer et al, 2008 |
45 | Spawning site preparation | The female dig few nests | Susbtrate chooser | Bruslé and Quignard, 2001 |
45 | Spawning site preparation | The female chooses the nest site and prepares the nest | No category | Groot, 1996 |
45 | Spawning site preparation | Female dig nest | Susbtrate chooser | Ombredane et al, 2001 |
45 | Spawning site preparation | Brood hiders | Susbtrate chooser | Fishbase, 2006 |
45 | Spawning site preparation | The female creates a shallowo depression (redd) in the gravel | Susbtrate chooser | Scott and Crossman, 1973 |
45 | Spawning site preparation | Zygotes are placed in a special habitat (e.g. scattered on vegetation, or buried in gravel) | Susbtrate chooser | Vila-Gispert and Moreno-Amich, 2002 |
45 | Spawning site preparation | The female excavates a saucer-shaped nest in the gravel | No category | Kerr and Grant, 1999 |
45 | Spawning site preparation | Eggs are buried in substrates | Susbtrate chooser | Billard, 1997 |
45 | Spawning site preparation | Brood hiders | Susbtrate chooser | Balon, 1975 |
45 | Spawning site preparation | Brood hiders | Susbtrate chooser | Kamler et al, 1996 |
45 | Spawning site preparation | The digging of spawning pit is exclusively a phase of female behavior [Both male and female trout defend the redd against other fish in the period just preceding spawning] | Susbtrate chooser | Greeley, 1932 |
45 | Spawning site preparation | Nest by female | Best build by female | Fleming, 1998 |
45 | Spawning site preparation | Cleaning of a restricted bed area from fine sediments is also achieved by digging salmonid females, which build spawning redds up to 30 cm depth, ensuring sufficient oxygenation of the deposited eggs and for developing larvae after hatching | Susbtrate chooser | Meyer et al, 2008 |
46 | Nycthemeral period of oviposition | Night and day | Day | Bruslé and Quignard, 2001 |
46 | Nycthemeral period of oviposition | Spawning activity takes place during the day | Day | Kerr and Grant, 1999 |
46 | Nycthemeral period of oviposition | Species were more active during the mid-day period when the light was bright than in early morning and late evening | Day | Greeley, 1932 |
46 | Nycthemeral period of oviposition | Spawning took place exclusively at night in Själsöan. During the day, spawning were difficult to see as they generally hide under the streambanks | Day | Rubin et al, 2005 |
47 | Mating system | By pair, one male and one female | Monogamy | Bruslé and Quignard, 2001 |
47 | Mating system | The male courts the female while she is digging the nest and defends the nesting territory against intrundinf males. When the nest is finished, female and male simultaneously deposit ova and sperm during a short spawning act | No category | Groot, 1996 |
47 | Mating system | The male, a larger fish then the female at all observed instances of spanwing, darts to a position agasint one side of the female and curves his body toward hers in such a manner as to hold her against the bottom [Both males and females participate in several mating acts before becoming entirelyfinished with the reprodcutive activities of a single season] | No category | Greeley, 1932 |
47 | Mating system | Only one spawning couple was observed at one time above the redd. It was composed of a spawning female and a "hooknose" courting her. Sometimes, smaller 'sneakers' were also observed near the spawning couple. 'Sneakers' stayed downstream from the couple and waited until the female spawned. At that moment, they rapidly swam between the spawning female and male, released their sperm and swam away. | No category | Rubin et al, 2005 |
48 | Spawning release | Once | Total | Rinchard, 1996 |
48 | Spawning release | Several nests are generally completed in succession by the female during the spawning season before she is spent, with each nest containing a few hundred eggs | Multiple | Groot, 1996 |
48 | Spawning release | The process is repeated many times, but when spawning is completed, the female covers the redd with gravel | No category | Scott and Crossman, 1973 |
48 | Spawning release | A female may dig three to four redd | No category | Kerr and Grant, 1999 |
48 | Spawning release | Mean of 34 (range 5-69%) of repeat spawning for anadromous populations, Mean of 64.6% for resident populations | No category | Fleming, 1998 |
48 | Spawning release | Each female spawned all her eggs on a single spawning area in only one redd generally over one to two nights | Total | Rubin et al, 2005 |
49 | Parity | Brown trout as old as thirteen years of age have been reported | No category | Kerr and Grant, 1999 |
49 | Parity | Age ranges from 2 to 15 years | No category | Crisp, 1994 |
49 | Parity | Few anadromous brown trout spawned more than once in Själsöan (7.3% of the males and 5.7% of the females). Fourteen males and 11 females were observed spawning in Själsöan 2 years in succession, and three males and two females 3 years in succession | Iteroparous | Rubin et al, 2005 |
49 | Parity | Some fish spawned and left the river, some died after spawning, while others died unspent | Semelparous | Aarestrup and Jepsen, 1998 |
49 | Parity | Return to lake after spawning | Iteroparous | Goodyear et al, 1982 |
49 | Parity | It lives for 3 to 5 years and older individuals are less abundant | No category | Randak et al, 2006 |
50 | Parental care | The female defends the redd against other females searching for a place to spawn | Male parental care | Groot, 1996 |
50 | Parental care | Nonguarders | No care | Fishbase, 2006 |
50 | Parental care | When spawning is completed, the female covers the redd with gravel | Female parental care | Scott and Crossman, 1973 |
50 | Parental care | No parental protection of zygotes, embryo and larvae | No care | Vila-Gispert and Moreno-Amich, 2002 |
50 | Parental care | The female, throughout the long period of egg covering (a process continued for one to several hours) resents the presence of any fish at or just above the spot where the eggs lie [Male defence lasts only trough early stages of egg covering] | No category | Greeley, 1932 |
50 | Parental care | None after nesting | No care | Fleming, 1998 |