Trait completeness | 88% |
Total data | 273 |
References | 38 |
Author: Fabrice Téletchéa
License: All rights reserved
Trait id | Trait | Primary data | Secondary Data | References |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Oocyte diameter | 0.62-1.06 [Ovarium diameter] but all studies 0.55-1.50 | 0.84 mm | Kalkan et al, 2005 |
1 | Oocyte diameter | 1.5-2 [Not specified] | 1.75 mm | Bruslé and Quignard, 2001 |
1 | Oocyte diameter | 0.83-1.5 | 1.17 mm | Unlu and Balci, 1993 |
1 | Oocyte diameter | 1.4 [Before water hardening] | 1.4 mm | Changeux and Le Louarn, 2001 |
1 | Oocyte diameter | 1.00-1.95 in five different populations, up to 3.30 ? [Average diameter of the largest oocyte in fully developed ovaries] | 1.48 mm | Vila-Gispert and Moreno-Amich, 2002 |
1 | Oocyte diameter | 1.06 [Ripe eggs] | 1.06 mm | Kalkan et al, 2005 |
1 | Oocyte diameter | The maximum egg diameter in March and April were 1.350 and 1.275 mm, respectively [as oocytes in ovaries], in other studies: 0.78-1.20; 0.55-1.38; 0.96-1.35 | 0.99 mm | Sasi, 2003 |
1 | Oocyte diameter | The highest mean egg diameter was found in May (1.04 mm) and the lowest values was found in July (0.46 mm). Eggs diameters were determine din other studies at 0.78-1.20 mm, 0.55-1.38 mm, 1.03 mm, and 0.83-1.50 mm | 0.99 mm | Ünver, 1998 |
1 | Oocyte diameter | Diameter of mature eggs ranges from 1.5-2.0 mm | 1.75 mm | Zelepien, 1997 |
1 | Oocyte diameter | Egg diameter varied from 100 µm and 137 µm with a mean of 119 µm | 100.0 mm | Erdogan et al, 2002 |
2 | Egg size after water-hardening | 1.8 ± 0.2 [Newly fertilized eggs stripped from a female, n=20] | 1.8 mm | Calta, 2000 |
2 | Egg size after water-hardening | 1.99-2.31 [Seems to be fertilized eggs] | 2.15 mm | Bonislawska et al, 2001 |
2 | Egg size after water-hardening | 2 [Drifting eggs] | 2.0 mm | Copp et al, 2002b |
2 | Egg size after water-hardening | 1.97 [Eggs stripped] | 1.97 mm | Penaz, 1968 |
2 | Egg size after water-hardening | 2.0 [Not specified] | 2.0 mm | Kamler and Wolnicki, 2006 |
2 | Egg size after water-hardening | After swelling diameter increases by a factor of 1.3-1.6 | 1.45 mm | Zelepien, 1997 |
3 | Egg Buoyancy | Dermersal, negatively buoyant | Demersal | Calta, 2000 |
3 | Egg Buoyancy | Stuck to the bottom of the box | Demersal | Penaz and Sterba, 1969 |
4 | Egg adhesiveness | Adhesive [attached to the bottom of the haching tray during the incubation period] | Adhesive | Calta, 2000 |
4 | Egg adhesiveness | Adhesive, stick to plants and rocks | Adhesive | Bruslé and Quignard, 2001 |
4 | Egg adhesiveness | Adhesive, stick to plants and gravels | Adhesive | Billard, 1997 |
4 | Egg adhesiveness | Adhesive | Adhesive | Changeux and Le Louarn, 2001 |
4 | Egg adhesiveness | Adhesive | Adhesive | Mann, 1996 |
4 | Egg adhesiveness | Stuck to the bottom of the box | Adhesive | Penaz and Sterba, 1969 |
4 | Egg adhesiveness | Fertilised eggs stick to the substrate due to their sticky and thick egg envelopes | Adhesive | Zelepien, 1997 |
4 | Egg adhesiveness | The current study demonstrated that eggs of common carp (and of vimba, bleak and chub in unpublished data) became sticky within seconds after mixing with water and already 30 s after water contact was enough to develop the egg stickiness mechanism | Adhesive | Mansour et al, 2008 |
5 | Incubation time | 4 at 15°C | 4.0 days | Bruslé and Quignard, 2001 |
5 | Incubation time | 3 at 18°C | 3.0 days | Changeux and Le Louarn, 2001 |
5 | Incubation time | 4 days at 18°C | 4.0 days | Harzevili et al, 2003 |
5 | Incubation time | Middle time of incubation was either 170.3 or 74.4, both at 18°C [In other studies described as 97 hours at 18°C] | 170.3 days | Penaz and Sterba, 1969 |
5 | Incubation time | 75.5 hours at 18°C | 75.5 days | Penaz, 1968 |
5 | Incubation time | At 16-20°C incubation period ranges from 150 to 75.4 hours | 18.0 days | Zelepien, 1997 |
6 | Temperature for incubation | 15 | 15.0 °C | Bruslé and Quignard, 2001 |
6 | Temperature for incubation | 17 ± 1°C | 17.0 °C | Calta, 2000 |
6 | Temperature for incubation | 18 | 18.0 °C | Changeux and Le Louarn, 2001 |
6 | Temperature for incubation | Reared at 18°C | 18.0 °C | Harzevili et al, 2003 |
6 | Temperature for incubation | The whole process of incubation was effected at the constant temperature of water 18°C | 18.0 °C | Penaz and Sterba, 1969 |
6 | Temperature for incubation | At constant temperature of 18°C | 18.0 °C | Penaz, 1968 |
6 | Temperature for incubation | Viable range 16-30 | 23.0 °C | Kamler and Wolnicki, 2006 |
6 | Temperature for incubation | The temperature of incubation was 15.8°C | 15.8 °C | Krejszeff et al, 2008 |
7 | Degree-days for incubation | 60-80 | 70.0 °C * day | Bruslé and Quignard, 2001 |
7 | Degree-days for incubation | 50-60 [3 days at 18°C] | 55.0 °C * day | Changeux and Le Louarn, 2001 |
7 | Degree-days for incubation | 60 [4 days at 18°C] | 60.0 °C * day | Harzevili et al, 2003 |
7 | Degree-days for incubation | Middle day degrees of inducation either 80.4 or 56.5, both at 18°C [in other studies described as 80.91 DD at 16.7°C] | 80.4 °C * day | Penaz and Sterba, 1969 |
7 | Degree-days for incubation | 56.6 DD at 18°C | 56.6 °C * day | Penaz, 1968 |
Trait id | Trait | Primary Data | Secondary Data | References |
---|---|---|---|---|
8 | Initial larval size | 6.3-6.8 | 6.55 mm | Calta, 2000 |
8 | Initial larval size | 5.5-6.5 | 6.0 mm | Bruslé and Quignard, 2001 |
8 | Initial larval size | 8.52 ± 0.28, 8 days after hatching | 8.52 mm | Harzevili et al, 2003 |
8 | Initial larval size | The size of hatched embryos ranged from a mean of 6.09 for the first experiment and 5.31 mm for the second | 5.31 mm | Penaz and Sterba, 1969 |
8 | Initial larval size | Average standard length: 4.9 mm | 4.9 mm | Penaz, 1968 |
8 | Initial larval size | Newly hatched larvae is 5.3-6.5 mm long | 5.9 mm | Zelepien, 1997 |
9 | Larvae behaviour | Newly hatched larvae stayed mainly motionless at the bottom of the tank; however time to time performed short and sudden jerky anguilliform movements [Schooling behavior for the entire period of larvae and juvenile development] | Demersal | Calta, 2000 |
9 | Larvae behaviour | The embryos are positioned sideways on the bottom of the contained in the immobile condition, and only at times they give violent jerks ahead | Demersal | Penaz, 1968 |
10 | Reaction to light | Initially the larvae are photophobic | Photophobic | Mann, 1996 |
10 | Reaction to light | Not respondind to light | Photopositive | Penaz, 1968 |
11 | Temperature during larval development | 17 ± 1 | 17.0 °C | Calta, 2000 |
11 | Temperature during larval development | 18 | 18.0 °C | Harzevili et al, 2003 |
11 | Temperature during larval development | Temperature was not regulated, range from 15.4-17.8°C | 16.6 °C | Penaz, 1968 |
11 | Temperature during larval development | Reared at 19-25 | 22.0 °C | Kamler and Wolnicki, 2006 |
11 | Temperature during larval development | Reared at 19-25 | 22.0 °C | Wolnicki, 2005 |
13 | Full yolk-sac resorption | About 130 [8 days at 17 °C] | 130.0 °C * day | Calta, 2000 |
13 | Full yolk-sac resorption | 11 days, consumption of yolk sac finished at temperature between 15.4 and 17.8°C | 11.0 °C * day | Penaz, 1968 |
14 | Onset of exogeneous feeding | About 130 [8 days at 17 °C] | 130.0 °C * day | Calta, 2000 |
14 | Onset of exogeneous feeding | [5 days after hatching, the larvae were fed ad libitum with the rotifer, for 3 days at 18°C] | 5.0 °C * day | Harzevili et al, 2003 |
14 | Onset of exogeneous feeding | 9 days, oral feeding started at temperature between 15.4 and 17.8°C | 9.0 °C * day | Penaz, 1968 |
Trait id | Trait | Primary Data | Secondary Data | References |
---|---|---|---|---|
15 | Age at sexual maturity | 2-5 [Female] | 3.5 year | Kalkan et al, 2005 |
15 | Age at sexual maturity | 3 but sometimes 5-8 | 6.5 year | Bruslé and Quignard, 2001 |
15 | Age at sexual maturity | 3 | 3.0 year | Unlu and Balci, 1993 |
15 | Age at sexual maturity | 3 [Female] | 3.0 year | Changeux and Le Louarn, 2001 |
15 | Age at sexual maturity | 4-7 Female] | 5.5 year | Fishbase, 2006 |
15 | Age at sexual maturity | 2-7 in six different populations from south to north [24-84 months, 84 in England, age at maturation] | 4.5 year | Vila-Gispert and Moreno-Amich, 2002 |
15 | Age at sexual maturity | Females and males first attained sexual maturity in their second year | 1.0 year | Sasi, 2003 |
15 | Age at sexual maturity | 4-5 [Female] | 4.5 year | Poncin et al, 1987 |
15 | Age at sexual maturity | Most females are mature at age VII and some at V or VI | 7.0 year | Mann, 1976 |
15 | Age at sexual maturity | Females matured in their third or fourth year of life. Other studies indicated that the sexual maturity age in the chub population of the Black Sea basin is III. The maturity age of chub was found to be III in the females and II in the males, however it was determined to be IV in the females and III in the males | 3.0 year | Ünver, 1998 |
15 | Age at sexual maturity | In Poland, chub usually reach maturity at the age of 3-4 years. Females maturing at the age of 6 years in the river Stobnica. 28% of chub reached maturity at the age 3+, and 60% at the age 4+. In other countries 3-4 year period of maturation was reported. | 3.5 year | Zelepien, 1997 |
15 | Age at sexual maturity | With the exception of a small proportion of females (2.23% which mature in their second year), all females matured sexuallyduring their thrid-fifth year of life. 80.22 in their third year, 90.5% in their fourth year, 96.5% in their fifth year and 100% in their sixth year and after | 2.23 year | Erdogan et al, 2002 |
16 | Length at sexual maturity | 14.6 | 14.6 cm | Unlu and Balci, 1993 |
16 | Length at sexual maturity | 20-30 [Female] | 25.0 cm | Fishbase, 2006 |
16 | Length at sexual maturity | 26.1-32.93 [Female] | 29.52 cm | Kalkan et al, 2005 |
16 | Length at sexual maturity | Minimum length at sexual maturity is 14.4 | 14.4 cm | Sasi, 2003 |
16 | Length at sexual maturity | Size in different regions, for females varie between 19.4-22.2 [Age 4] and 24.1-25.1 [Age 5] and 15.2 and 20.8 for both sex at age 4 | 20.8 cm | Mann, 1976 |
16 | Length at sexual maturity | The smallest mature female was 7.4 mm | 7.4 cm | Ünver, 1998 |
16 | Length at sexual maturity | Length of females was 19.4 cm. Other described fish matured > 20 cm (sex not specified) | 19.4 cm | Zelepien, 1997 |
16 | Length at sexual maturity | Means of 95.6 [Age 2], 153.1 [Age 3], 175.9 [Age 4], 206.0 [Age 5], 226.2 [Age 6], and 258.5 [Age 7] for females | 95.6 cm | Ünver, 1998 |
16 | Length at sexual maturity | Between 16 and 19 cm fork length | 19.0 cm | Erdogan et al, 2002 |
17 | Weight at sexual maturity | 0.265-0.500 [Female] | 0.38 kg | Kalkan et al, 2005 |
17 | Weight at sexual maturity | Minimum weight at sexual maturity is 41.6 | 41.6 kg | Sasi, 2003 |
17 | Weight at sexual maturity | Mean weight of 92 g [Age 4] and 174 [Age 5] | 92.0 kg | Mann, 1976 |
17 | Weight at sexual maturity | < 150 g (Sex not specified) | 150.0 kg | Zelepien, 1997 |
17 | Weight at sexual maturity | Means of 11.44 g [Age 2], 47.05 [Age 3], 71.15 [Age 4], 114.60 [Age 5], 159.9 [Age 6], and 240.3 [Age 7] for females | 11.44 kg | Ünver, 1998 |
19 | Relative fecundity | 45 | 45.0 thousand eggs/kg | Bruslé and Quignard, 2001 |
19 | Relative fecundity | 57 | 57.0 thousand eggs/kg | Changeux and Le Louarn, 2001 |
19 | Relative fecundity | 199.05 [Age II], 160.05 [Age III], 219.78 [Age IV], 211.74 [Age V] | 199.05 thousand eggs/kg | Sasi, 2003 |
19 | Relative fecundity | 69239 [Size 17 cm], 81372 [Size 24.8 cm], 61449 [Size 35]. Maximum values of relative fecundity was observed in females 24-30 cm long | 27.0 thousand eggs/kg | Zelepien, 1997 |
19 | Relative fecundity | Linear increase between fecundity and weight: n=1588.6+120.53 x W | 1588.6 thousand eggs/kg | Ünver, 1998 |
20 | Absolute fecundity | 20-100 | 60.0 thousand eggs | Bruslé and Quignard, 2001 |
20 | Absolute fecundity | 2.5-20 | 11.25 thousand eggs | Unlu and Balci, 1993 |
20 | Absolute fecundity | 40 for a female of 35 cm | 40.0 thousand eggs | Changeux and Le Louarn, 2001 |
20 | Absolute fecundity | 20-64 in six different populations [Average number of vitellogenic oocyes of mature females in a single spawning season] | 42.0 thousand eggs | Vila-Gispert and Moreno-Amich, 2002 |
20 | Absolute fecundity | 9.142-53.1 in the ages II-VII | 31.12 thousand eggs | Sasi, 2003 |
20 | Absolute fecundity | Lowest fecundity observed at 32155 for a female 41.5 cm long and 1253 g and highest 64658 for a female 46 cm long and 1660 g | 32155.0 thousand eggs | Mann, 1976 |
20 | Absolute fecundity | > 100 00 eggs per reproductive cycle | 100.0 thousand eggs | Cattanéo et al, 2001 |
20 | Absolute fecundity | 6370 [Size 17 cm], 22947 [Size 24.8 cm], 51443 [Size 35] | 6370.0 thousand eggs | Zelepien, 1997 |
20 | Absolute fecundity | The mean fecundity was found to be 1158 in age group II and 28664 in age group VII. In other studies, described as: 1909-15680, 1960, 61808, 13269-59200, 2050-20140 eggs | 8794.5 thousand eggs | Ünver, 1998 |
20 | Absolute fecundity | Fecundity varied from a mean of 5012 eggs per female (III years old) to a mean of 25000 eggs per female (VIII years old) | 5012.0 thousand eggs | Erdogan et al, 2002 |
21 | Oocyte development | Group-synchronous | Group-synchronous | Rinchard, 1996 |
21 | Oocyte development | Asynchronous process of oocyte maturation in ovaries was reported. Also observed oocytes of different size and maturity state in pre-spawning chub ovaries. The largest oocytes were released as the first batch of eggs (70-73% of ovary content) | Asynchronous | Zelepien, 1997 |
22 | Onset of oogenesis | After August the gonads begin to develop and the values of GSI again start to increase gradually until November | ['August', 'November'] | Kalkan et al, 2005 |
22 | Onset of oogenesis | The redevelopment of gonads did not begin until September | ['September'] | Mann, 1976 |
22 | Onset of oogenesis | After August, GSI increase up to 3 during the winter than remain constant until March | ['January', 'February', 'March', 'August'] | Unlu and Balci, 1993 |
22 | Onset of oogenesis | Ovary development began in December [Yet on the GSI curve, slight increase of GSI in September-October] | ['September', 'October', 'December'] | Sasi, 2003 |
22 | Onset of oogenesis | November | ['November'] | Poncin et al, 1989 |
22 | Onset of oogenesis | Weight of gonads increase after September | ['September'] | Zelepien, 1997 |
22 | Onset of oogenesis | After August, the gonads began to develop and the values of GSI again started to increase gradually until November | ['August', 'November'] | Ünver, 1998 |
22 | Onset of oogenesis | In females in both years of this study, gonad development started in December | ['December'] | Erdogan et al, 2002 |
23 | Intensifying oogenesis activity | April-May [From 0.95 in March to 13.56 in May] | ['March', 'April', 'May'] | Kalkan et al, 2005 |
23 | Intensifying oogenesis activity | March-April [From 4 to 10%] | ['March', 'April'] | Unlu and Balci, 1993 |
23 | Intensifying oogenesis activity | February-March [From 4 to ca. 7.5] | ['February', 'March'] | Sasi, 2003 |
23 | Intensifying oogenesis activity | Increase regularly from September to May, but most between March-April | ['January', 'February', 'March', 'April', 'May', 'September', 'October', 'November'] | Mann, 1976 |
23 | Intensifying oogenesis activity | April-May | ['April', 'May'] | Poncin et al, 1989 |
23 | Intensifying oogenesis activity | Particularly intense from April to May | ['April', 'May'] | Erdogan et al, 2002 |
23 | Intensifying oogenesis activity | During spring (March-May), an obviously rapid growth of gonads occurred until the next spawning. Differences between values according to months, especially Apriln are statistically significant | ['March', 'April', 'May', 'June'] | Koc et al, 2007 |
24 | Maximum GSI value | 13.56 [May] | 13.56 percent | Kalkan et al, 2005 |
24 | Maximum GSI value | Up to 15-18% [June] | 16.5 percent | Unlu and Balci, 1993 |
24 | Maximum GSI value | 7.37% [In March] | 7.37 percent | Sasi, 2003 |
24 | Maximum GSI value | 9-10% [In Mid-May] | 9.5 percent | Mann, 1976 |
24 | Maximum GSI value | 12, range 11-14 [In June] | 12.5 percent | Poncin et al, 1989 |
24 | Maximum GSI value | The maximum values for females in May was calculated to be 9.1 | 9.1 percent | Ünver, 1998 |
24 | Maximum GSI value | Just before spawning ovaries may contribute to 1% body mass. Other authors said that at the brginning of spawning ovarian mass depends on female body size and contributes to 7.3-19.6% | 13.45 percent | Zelepien, 1997 |
24 | Maximum GSI value | Around 10% based on graph in May | 10.0 percent | Erdogan et al, 2002 |
26 | Resting period | July, August | 3.0 months | Unlu and Balci, 1993 |
26 | Resting period | < 0.5 from July until December | 7.0 months | Kalkan et al, 2005 |
26 | Resting period | June-September quiescent period, About 1% | 1.0 months | Mann, 1976 |
26 | Resting period | <1% [From May to September] | 1.0 months | Sasi, 2003 |
26 | Resting period | Gonads of chub females and males after spawning remain in a resting state until September. | 2.0 months | Zelepien, 1997 |
26 | Resting period | In June, the GSI diminished because of spawning and continued to do so to the end of July | 3.0 months | Erdogan et al, 2002 |
Trait id | Trait | Primary Data | Secondary Data | References |
---|---|---|---|---|
27 | Age at sexual maturity | 2 but sometimes 4-7 | 5.5 years | Bruslé and Quignard, 2001 |
27 | Age at sexual maturity | 2 | 2.0 years | Unlu and Balci, 1993 |
27 | Age at sexual maturity | 2 [Male] | 2.0 years | Changeux and Le Louarn, 2001 |
27 | Age at sexual maturity | 3-5 [Male] | 4.0 years | Fishbase, 2006 |
27 | Age at sexual maturity | 3 [Male] | 3.0 years | Kalkan et al, 2005 |
27 | Age at sexual maturity | Females and males first attained sexual maturity in their second year | 1.0 years | Sasi, 2003 |
27 | Age at sexual maturity | 2-3 [Male] | 2.5 years | Poncin et al, 1987 |
27 | Age at sexual maturity | The majority of males are mature at age V though some are ripe as early as age III | 5.0 years | Mann, 1976 |
27 | Age at sexual maturity | Males reached maturity in their second or third year of life | 2.0 years | Ünver, 1998 |
27 | Age at sexual maturity | In Poland, chub usually reach maturity at the age of 3-4 years. Males maturing at the age of 4 years in the river Stobnica. 28% of chub reached maturity at the age 3+, and 60% at the age 4+. In other countries 3-4 year period of maturation was reported. Typically males mature 1-2 years earlier than females. | 3.5 years | Zelepien, 1997 |
27 | Age at sexual maturity | Males matured sexually during their second-fourth year of life. 47.07% of males were mature in their second year, 85.71% in their third year, 96.2% in their fourth year and 100% in their fifth year and after | 3.0 years | Erdogan et al, 2002 |
28 | Length at sexual maturity | 13 | 13.0 cm | Unlu and Balci, 1993 |
28 | Length at sexual maturity | 30.7 | 30.7 cm | Kalkan et al, 2005 |
28 | Length at sexual maturity | Minimum length at sexual maturity is 14.5 | 14.5 cm | Sasi, 2003 |
28 | Length at sexual maturity | Size in different regions, for males varie between 13.8-20.1 [Age 3] and 19.4-22 [Age 4] and 15.2 and 20.8 for both sex at age 4 | 16.95 cm | Mann, 1976 |
28 | Length at sexual maturity | The smallest mature male was 67 mm | 67.0 cm | Ünver, 1998 |
28 | Length at sexual maturity | Males maturing were 12.0 cm. | 12.0 cm | Zelepien, 1997 |
28 | Length at sexual maturity | Between 13 and 18 cm fork length | 18.0 cm | Erdogan et al, 2002 |
29 | Weight at sexual maturity | 0.397 | 0.4 kg | Kalkan et al, 2005 |
29 | Weight at sexual maturity | Minimum weight at sexual maturity is 54.5 g | 54.5 kg | Sasi, 2003 |
29 | Weight at sexual maturity | Mean weight of 33 g [Age 3] and 92 g [Age 4] | 33.0 kg | Mann, 1976 |
29 | Weight at sexual maturity | > 150 g (sex not specified) | 150.0 kg | Zelepien, 1997 |
30 | Male sexual dimorphism | Male bears nuptial tubercles | Present | Bruslé and Quignard, 2001 |
30 | Male sexual dimorphism | Male bears nuptial tubercles on head and opercules | Present | Changeux and Le Louarn, 2001 |
30 | Male sexual dimorphism | Fin rays of some chub individuals are intensively coloured during spawning | Absent | Zelepien, 1997 |
31 | Onset of spermatogenesis | December to February, slight increase in GSI | ['January', 'February', 'December'] | Guerriero et al, 2005 |
31 | Onset of spermatogenesis | Increase in November | ['November'] | Sasi, 2003 |
31 | Onset of spermatogenesis | The redevelopment of gonads did not begin until September | ['September'] | Mann, 1976 |
31 | Onset of spermatogenesis | October-november | ['October'] | Poncin et al, 1989 |
31 | Onset of spermatogenesis | Weight of gonads increase after September | ['September'] | Zelepien, 1997 |
31 | Onset of spermatogenesis | After August, the gonads began to develop and the values of GSI again started to increase gradually until November | ['August', 'November'] | Ünver, 1998 |
31 | Onset of spermatogenesis | September-October | ['September', 'October'] | Erdogan et al, 2002 |
32 | Main spermatogenesis activity | End of February and March | ['February', 'March'] | Guerriero et al, 2005 |
32 | Main spermatogenesis activity | Around March | ['March'] | Sasi, 2003 |
32 | Main spermatogenesis activity | March, but increase quite regularly between September to May | ['January', 'February', 'March', 'April', 'May', 'September', 'October', 'November'] | Mann, 1976 |
32 | Main spermatogenesis activity | March-April | ['March', 'April'] | Poncin et al, 1989 |
32 | Main spermatogenesis activity | April | ['April'] | Erdogan et al, 2002 |
33 | Maximum GSI value | 2.77 ± 0.04 % [April] | 2.77 percent | Guerriero et al, 2005 |
33 | Maximum GSI value | 2.29 [March] | 2.29 percent | Sasi, 2003 |
33 | Maximum GSI value | Most between 2.5-4, some almost 6% [June] | 3.25 percent | Mann, 1976 |
33 | Maximum GSI value | Mean 5, range 4-6 [June] | 5.0 percent | Poncin et al, 1989 |
33 | Maximum GSI value | The maximum values for males in May was calculated to be 5.2 | 5.2 percent | Ünver, 1998 |
33 | Maximum GSI value | Up to 6% | 6.0 percent | Zelepien, 1997 |
33 | Maximum GSI value | 8.5% [In May] | 8.5 percent | Erdogan et al, 2002 |
35 | Resting period | July to November, only germinal cells were evident | 6.0 months | Guerriero et al, 2005 |
35 | Resting period | April to November <0.5 | 9.0 months | Sasi, 2003 |
35 | Resting period | June-September quiescent period, About 1% | 1.0 months | Mann, 1976 |
35 | Resting period | Gonads of females after spawning remain in spawning remain state until September | 2.0 months | Zelepien, 1997 |
Trait id | Trait | Primary Data | Secondary Data | References |
---|---|---|---|---|
36 | Spawning migration distance | Adults ascends the stream to spawn, often having to cross barriers and lead up waterfalls; population of adults can remain in the stream troughout the year | No data | Calta, 2000 |
36 | Spawning migration distance | From the nutrition ground to spawning ground | No data | Bruslé and Quignard, 2001 |
36 | Spawning migration distance | From deeper to shallower waters | No data | Changeux and Le Louarn, 2001 |
36 | Spawning migration distance | Home range 4km, localised spawning | 4.0 km | Environment agency, ??? |
36 | Spawning migration distance | The distance of spawning migration varied between c. 100m and 16 km | 16.0 km | Fredrich et al, 2003 |
36 | Spawning migration distance | Usually it displays no spawning migration | No data | Zelepien, 1997 |
37 | Spawning migration period | Near the onset of reproduction | No data | Calta, 2000 |
37 | Spawning migration period | In both years, most chub started spawning migrations on 21 to 22 May. Chub stayed at or near (distance <50m) the spanwing grounds for 1 to 6 days and returned to their original home sites afterward. In both years, 44 chub strated their second spawning migration on 17 or 18 June mainly to the spawning grounds as in May. By 20 June, all chub were at spoawning grounds. After having spect 1 to 7 days on spawning grounds, chub migrated back to their individual home ranges and stayed there during the postspawning season up to the end of the trackning observations. In 1995, first spawning migration strated after a period of decreased in water tmeperature from 14 to 12°C. In 1996, weter temperature increased from 11 to 14°C beforte the first spawning | ['May', 'June'] | Fredrich et al, 2003 |
38 | Homing | Kind of homing has been suggested | Present | Bruslé and Quignard, 2001 |
38 | Homing | Tendendy to return to the same spawning ground (reproductive homing) | Present | Fredrich et al, 2003 |
39 | Spawning season | April-June | ['April', 'June'] | Billard, 1997 |
39 | Spawning season | April-July but vary from May-June to May-September | ['January', 'February', 'March', 'April', 'May', 'June', 'July', 'August', 'September', 'October', 'November'] | Kalkan et al, 2005 |
39 | Spawning season | April to June | ['April', 'May', 'June'] | Bruslé and Quignard, 2001 |
39 | Spawning season | April to Mid-June | ['April', 'May', 'June'] | Calta, 2000 |
39 | Spawning season | May to late June | ['May', 'June'] | Unlu and Balci, 1993 |
39 | Spawning season | From mid-April to mid-June | ['April', 'May', 'June'] | Changeux and Le Louarn, 2001 |
39 | Spawning season | May [Also April and June] | ['April', 'May', 'June'] | Fishbase, 2006 |
39 | Spawning season | May-July | ['May', 'July'] | Mann, 1996 |
39 | Spawning season | May-July | ['May', 'July'] | Environment agency, ??? |
39 | Spawning season | May-June | ['May', 'June'] | Terver, 1984 |
39 | Spawning season | April to July | ['April', 'May', 'June', 'July'] | Kalkan et al, 2005 |
39 | Spawning season | Spawninh took place between March and April [Warm climate in southern Turkey] | ['March', 'April'] | Sasi, 2003 |
39 | Spawning season | Spawning occurred from the end of May into June | ['May', 'June'] | Mann, 1976 |
39 | Spawning season | May-June | ['May', 'June'] | Kamler and Wolnicki, 2006 |
39 | Spawning season | Between May and July | ['May', 'July'] | Ünver, 1998 |
39 | Spawning season | May-June | ['May', 'June'] | Cattanéo et al, 2001 |
39 | Spawning season | In European temperate waters chub spawn in spring, usually in May and June | ['April', 'May', 'June'] | Zelepien, 1997 |
39 | Spawning season | In both years of he study, fish began to spawn on May 15 and the spawning continued to the end of July | ['May', 'July'] | Erdogan et al, 2002 |
39 | Spawning season | Initial hatching took place between mid-June and mid-July, successive cohorts appearing at intervals thereafter | ['June', 'July'] | Nunn et al, 2007 |
39 | Spawning season | Spawning occurred between April and May […] Other studies : mainly in May and June, but also as late as September (in Kizilirmak River), or as early as April | ['April', 'May', 'June', 'September'] | Koc et al, 2007 |
40 | Spawning period duration | 4-8 [1.00-2.00 months, length of breeding season] | 6.0 weeks | Vila-Gispert and Moreno-Amich, 2002 |
40 | Spawning period duration | 8-9 | 8.5 weeks | Terver, 1984 |
40 | Spawning period duration | At the end of the observation of gonads, it was determined that the fish has laid from May to the end of June. In other studies, described as between April and May, and if the altitude is more than 1000 meters, spawning occurs in June | 1000.0 weeks | Ünver, 1998 |
41 | Spawning temperature | Close to 15°C | 15.0 °C | Bruslé and Quignard, 2001 |
41 | Spawning temperature | Really high temperature from 28-32°C | 30.0 °C | Guerriero et al, 2005 |
41 | Spawning temperature | 15-23°C | 19.0 °C | Unlu and Balci, 1993 |
41 | Spawning temperature | Above 15°C | 15.0 °C | Billard, 1997 |
41 | Spawning temperature | Above 15°C | 15.0 °C | Changeux and Le Louarn, 2001 |
41 | Spawning temperature | > 12 | 12.0 °C | Mann, 1996 |
41 | Spawning temperature | 18-20 | 19.0 °C | Environment agency, ??? |
41 | Spawning temperature | Between 13.5-20.6°C | 17.05 °C | Sasi, 2003 |
41 | Spawning temperature | 14-16 | 15.0 °C | Poncin et al, 1987 |
41 | Spawning temperature | In 1995, spawning took place in a rapid increase of water temprature from 13 to 21°C. In 1995, the temperature remained constant at 11-14°c during the first spawning | 12.5 °C | Fredrich et al, 2003 |
41 | Spawning temperature | >18 | 18.0 °C | Kamler and Wolnicki, 2006 |
41 | Spawning temperature | Usually > 18°C | 18.0 °C | Zelepien, 1997 |
41 | Spawning temperature | Between 15 and 22°C | 15.0 °C | Erdogan et al, 2002 |
41 | Spawning temperature | In various areas: 12-28°C (Müceldi Stream), 15-23°C (Savur Stream), 16-23°C (Aras River); 14-19°C (Oltu Stream) and 16-18°C (Ikizcetepeler Dam Lake) | 20.0 °C | Koc et al, 2007 |
42 | Spawning water type | Relatively swift-flowing streams | Flowing or turbulent water | Calta, 2000 |
42 | Spawning water type | Water with current | Flowing or turbulent water | Bruslé and Quignard, 2001 |
42 | Spawning water type | Lotic habitat conditions, moderate to high water flow [0.15-0.75 m/s], BUT one population found spawning without any current | Flowing or turbulent water | Arlinghaus and Wolter, 2003 |
42 | Spawning water type | Flowing water | Flowing or turbulent water | Fishbase, 2006 |
42 | Spawning water type | Current velocity: 20-50 cm/s | Flowing or turbulent water | Mann, 1996 |
42 | Spawning water type | Located near erosion banks or in shallow upstream of a bridge. The current speed near the spawning substratum ranged between 0.15 to 0.35 m/s | Flowing or turbulent water | Fredrich et al, 2003 |
42 | Spawning water type | Some species seem to be strickly dependent on the tributary zone as they were never observed reproducing in the reservoir (asp, bleak, chub and white bream), while others are facultative tributary users (roach, bream, pike, perch, rudd). | No category | Hladik and Kubecka, 2003 |
42 | Spawning water type | Fast current speed | Flowing or turbulent water | Zelepien, 1997 |
43 | Spawning depth | Shallow waters: 0.1-0.3 m BUT one population spawned at depth up to 1.28 m | 0.2 m | Arlinghaus and Wolter, 2003 |
43 | Spawning depth | The water depth varied between 0.1-10 | 5.05 m | Fredrich et al, 2003 |
44 | Spawning substrate | Rheophilous, gravel | Lithophils | Calta, 2000 |
44 | Spawning substrate | Phyto-lithophil : plants and gravels | Lithophils | Bruslé and Quignard, 2001 |
44 | Spawning substrate | Gravel banks BUT one population spawned on allochtonous gravel with a mean diameter of 39± 16 mm | Lithophils | Arlinghaus and Wolter, 2003 |
44 | Spawning substrate | Plants and gravels | Lithophils | Billard, 1997 |
44 | Spawning substrate | Gravel, weed and stones | Lithophils | Fishbase, 2006 |
44 | Spawning substrate | Stones and gravel: >2.5 | Lithophils | Mann, 1996 |
44 | Spawning substrate | Gravel, typically 20-40 mm diameter | Lithophils | Environment agency, ??? |
44 | Spawning substrate | Lithophil | Lithophils | Wolter and Vilcinskas, 1997 |
44 | Spawning substrate | Stony bottom | Lithophils | Fredrich et al, 2003 |
44 | Spawning substrate | Lithophilous fishes | Lithophils | Penaz, 1973 |
44 | Spawning substrate | Lithophilous fishes | Lithophils | Penaz, 1968 |
44 | Spawning substrate | Lithophil | Lithophils | Cattanéo et al, 2001 |
44 | Spawning substrate | Belongs to a reproductive guilds of lithophils. They spawn on stones or gravel | Lithophils | Zelepien, 1997 |
45 | Spawning site preparation | Open substratum spawners | Open water/substratum scatter | Mann, 1996 |
45 | Spawning site preparation | Zygotes are placed in a special habitat (e.g. scattered on vegetation, or buried in gravel) | Susbtrate chooser | Vila-Gispert and Moreno-Amich, 2002 |
48 | Spawning release | Unique/multiple | Multiple | Rinchard, 1996 |
48 | Spawning release | Fractional spawner | Fractional | Calta, 2000 |
48 | Spawning release | 4 batches per spawning season | Multiple | Bruslé and Quignard, 2001 |
48 | Spawning release | Either single spawning per year or two to four spawnings per year | Total | Vila-Gispert and Moreno-Amich, 2002 |
48 | Spawning release | Multiple spawning | Multiple | Environment agency, ??? |
48 | Spawning release | Total or multiple spawner ? | Multiple | Fredrich et al, 2003 |
48 | Spawning release | One batch | Multiple | Cattanéo et al, 2001 |
48 | Spawning release | In natural conditions chub females release maximally two batches of eggs. Russian authors suggest that the number of released batches depends on the time of beginning of breeding season. Females spawning in May can repeat spawning in August, while those maturing in June release only one batch of eggs. | Multiple | Zelepien, 1997 |
48 | Spawning release | Three cohors of L. cephalus hatched between July 3 and 25 | No category | Rheinberger et al, 1987 |
48 | Spawning release | Adopt multiple spawning strategies, with up to three batches of eggs produced by individual fish | Multiple | Nunn et al, 2007 |
49 | Parity | The ages of captured fish ranged from I to VII years | No category | Sasi, 2004 |
49 | Parity | Up to 5 or 6 year classes | No category | Sasi, 2003 |
49 | Parity | Each fish appeared to spawn every year | Iteroparous | Mann, 1976 |
49 | Parity | Maximum ages observed were VI in males and VII in females | No category | Ünver, 1998 |
50 | Parental care | Non guarders | No care | Mann, 1996 |
50 | Parental care | No parental protection of zygotes, embryo and larvae | No care | Vila-Gispert and Moreno-Amich, 2002 |