Trait completeness | 80% |
Total data | 196 |
References | 43 |
Author: Fabrice Téletchéa
License: All rights reserved
Trait id | Trait | Primary data | Secondary Data | References |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Oocyte diameter | 6.0-7.0 | 6.5 mm | Mellinger, 2005 |
1 | Oocyte diameter | 6.0-7.0 | 6.5 mm | Barton, 1996 |
1 | Oocyte diameter | 6.0-8.5 | 7.25 mm | Internet, 2005 |
1 | Oocyte diameter | 6.3-7.9 | 7.1 mm | Groot, 1996 |
1 | Oocyte diameter | 6.0-7.0 | 6.5 mm | Scott and Crossman, 1973 |
1 | Oocyte diameter | 6.0-7.0 | 6.5 mm | Fishbase, 2006 |
1 | Oocyte diameter | Up to 10 | 10.0 mm | Tyler and Sumpter, 1996 |
2 | Egg size after water-hardening | 7.66-8.73 [Water-hardened egg] | 8.2 mm | Beacham and Murray, 1993 |
3 | Egg Buoyancy | Demersal | Demersal | Internet, 2005 |
3 | Egg Buoyancy | Demersal | Demersal | Scott and Crossman, 1973 |
3 | Egg Buoyancy | Soon absorb water, becoming water hardened and semi-buoyant | Pelagic | Kerr and Grant, 1999 |
3 | Egg Buoyancy | The eggs of Salmonidae are buried in unguarded nests called 'redds' and are demersal-nonadheive | Demersal | Kunz, 2004 |
3 | Egg Buoyancy | Chinook salmon eggs incubate within the riverbed at depths ranging from 18 to 43 cm beneath the riverbed surface | No category | Hanrahan, 2007 |
4 | Egg adhesiveness | Non-adhesive, adhesive during water hardening | Non-Adhesive | Internet, 2005 |
4 | Egg adhesiveness | Eggs are temporarily adhesive, but soon absorb water, becoming water hardened and semi-buoyant | Adhesive | Kerr and Grant, 1999 |
4 | Egg adhesiveness | The eggs of Salmonidae are buried in unguarded nests called 'redds' and are demersal-nonadheive | Non-Adhesive | Kunz, 2004 |
4 | Egg adhesiveness | Salmonidae, whose eggs are not sticky | Non-Adhesive | Woynarovich, 1962 |
5 | Incubation time | 50-55 at 10-12.5°C | 52.5 days | Internet, 2005 |
5 | Incubation time | 50-84 [7 to 9 weeks, and up to 12] | 67.0 days | Fishbase, 2006 |
5 | Incubation time | 193 [2°C], 149 [3°C], 120 [4°C], 100 [5°C], 85 [6°C], 74 [7°C], 65 [8°C], 58 [9°C] | 193.0 days | Kerr and Grant, 1999 |
5 | Incubation time | Eggs usually hatch in less than 4 months | 4.0 days | Goodyear et al, 1982 |
5 | Incubation time | 102.4 [5°C], 70.3 [7.5°C], 52.6 [10°C] and 42.1 [12.5°C] for 50% hatch | 102.4 days | Jensen, 1997 |
5 | Incubation time | 95 [6°C], 71 [8°C], 55 [10°C], and 44 [12°C] | 95.0 days | Heming, 1982 |
5 | Incubation time | At constant temperature: 204 [At 1.7°C], 157.5 [3.0°C], 120.1 [4.5°C], 76.8 [7.2°C], 46 [11.1°C], 41.9 [12.7°C] and 34.3 [15.3] and numerous other examples. At ambient temperatures: 172 [2.3°C], 132 [3.8°C], 112 [4.3°C], 97.6 [5.3°C], 62.5 [8.4°C], 42.3 [12.9°C] and 32.7 [15°C] | 204.0 days | Alderdice and Velsen, 1978 |
5 | Incubation time | 160 [3°C], 90 [6°C], 55 [10°C], 42 [12°C] | 160.0 days | Beacham and Murray, 1990 |
5 | Incubation time | 43.5 [12.1°C], 51.7 [10.5°C], 68.1 [8.4°C], 96.5 [5.5°C], 125.1 [4.4°C] | 43.5 days | Murray and Beacham, 1987 |
5 | Incubation time | 38.4 [14°C], 46.9 [11°C], 67.1 [8.0°C], 101.5 [5°C], 202 [2.0°C] | 38.4 days | Murray and McPhail, 1988 |
5 | Incubation time | Egg development from fertilization to 50% hatch at various constant temperatures: 160.3 days [At 3.0°C], 95 [At 6°C], 69 days [At 8°C], 55 days [At 10°C], 33 days [At 15°C], 28 [At 18.1°C] | 50.0 days | Velsen,1987 |
6 | Temperature for incubation | 4.4-9.4 and 5.8-14.2 | 6.9 °C | Barton, 1996 |
6 | Temperature for incubation | 5.8-14.2 [lower temprature is 0.6°C and lower] | 10.0 °C | Groot, 1996 |
6 | Temperature for incubation | Survive best at temperature less than 14 | 14.0 °C | Internet, 2005 |
6 | Temperature for incubation | 8-9 [Natural conditions] | 8.5 °C | Vronskii and Leman, 1991 |
6 | Temperature for incubation | 2-9 [Survival begins to decline when the temperatures go above 10°C, the upper tolearance limit for egg and larvae is somewhere between 412 and 15°C] | 5.5 °C | Kerr and Grant, 1999 |
6 | Temperature for incubation | 5-12.5 | 8.75 °C | Jensen, 1997 |
6 | Temperature for incubation | Optimum temperature of yolk conversion is about 4°C | 4.0 °C | Beacham and Murray, 1993 |
6 | Temperature for incubation | Incubated at ambient temperature at 12.4°C and chilled water at 5.9°C | 12.4 °C | Kinnison et al, 1998 |
6 | Temperature for incubation | Mean of 11.1°C, vary between 5.8-14.2 [A daily mean of 52°F was suitable for incubation, and that excessive mortality occurred if the daily mean exceeded 60°F. Also found the range of incubating temperatures was between 42.5 and 57.5°F] | 10.0 °C | Allbaugh and Manz, 1964 |
6 | Temperature for incubation | Could tolerate a temperature of 0.5 if previously incubated at 5.5°C [Both chinook and pink salmon eggs could tolerate temperatures as low as 33°F for long periods if the intial incubating temperature had been above 42°F]] | 0.5 °C | Combs, 1965 |
6 | Temperature for incubation | Mean water temperature during the incubation period were 6, 8, 10 and 12 | 6.0 °C | Heming et al, 1982 |
6 | Temperature for incubation | Eggs were fertilized and reared at 6, 8, 10 and 12°C | 6.0 °C | Heming, 1982 |
6 | Temperature for incubation | Lower and upper lethal temperatures for chinook salmon eggs, those associated with 50% mortality from fertilization to 50% hatch, are about 2.5-3.0°C and 16.0°C | 2.75 °C | Alderdice and Velsen, 1978 |
6 | Temperature for incubation | [High constant incubating temperatures established tha range between 57.5 and 60°F as the upper temperature threshold. Incubation at 35°F, resulted in complete mortality, thereby establishing this temperature as a lower limit for future trials. Other experiments, established the range 10 and 42.5°C as the lower threshold] | 57.5 °C | Combs and Burrows, 1957 |
6 | Temperature for incubation | Egg mortality during incubation from fertilization to 50% hatch at various temperatures: 52.6% [At 3.0°C], 7.1% [At 6°C], 9.3% [At 10°C], 99.0% [At 18.1°C] | 50.0 °C | Velsen,1987 |
6 | Temperature for incubation | Mean artificial egg pocket temperatures in the upper reach ranged from 6.1-6.7°C | 6.4 °C | Hanrahan, 2007 |
7 | Degree-days for incubation | 417 | 417.0 °C * day | Barton, 1996 |
7 | Degree-days for incubation | 550.0 | 550.0 °C * day | Internet, 2005 |
7 | Degree-days for incubation | From 390-540 | 465.0 °C * day | Kerr and Grant, 1999 |
7 | Degree-days for incubation | 511.8-527.5 [Between 5-12.5] | 519.65 °C * day | Jensen, 1997 |
7 | Degree-days for incubation | 420 | 420.0 °C * day | Bascinar and Okumus, 2004 |
7 | Degree-days for incubation | 480.3 to 491.4 [for different populations at 12.4°C]; | 480.3 °C * day | Kinnison et al, 1998 |
7 | Degree-days for incubation | Incubation time to 50% hatching varied inversely with temperature from 95d (556 tu) at 6°C, to 71 d (556 tu) at 8°C, to 55 days (534 tu) at 10°C and 44 days (520 tu) at 12°C | 50.0 °C * day | Heming et al, 1982 |
7 | Degree-days for incubation | 550-570 [71 at 8°C and 55 at 10°C] | 560.0 °C * day | Heming, 1982 |
7 | Degree-days for incubation | 480 [3°C], 540 [6°C], 550 [10°C], 504 [12°C] | 480.0 °C * day | Beacham and Murray, 1990 |
7 | Degree-days for incubation | 476 [Effective day-degrees] | 476.0 °C * day | Kamler, 2002 |
Trait id | Trait | Primary Data | Secondary Data | References |
---|---|---|---|---|
8 | Initial larval size | 20 | 20.0 mm | Internet, 2005 |
8 | Initial larval size | Mean fork length of 25.8 (25.7, 25.9) at 6°C, 25.6 (25.4, 25.8) at 8°C, 24.9 (24.8, 25, 0) at 10°C, 24.6 (24.6 (24.4, 24.8) at 12°C | 25.8 mm | Heming, 1982 |
8 | Initial larval size | Average 22, range 21-23.5 | 22.25 mm | Beacham and Murray, 1990 |
8 | Initial larval size | 35-44 [Newly emerged fry] | 39.5 mm | Groot, 1996 |
8 | Initial larval size | Means fork length vary according to temperature between 20.4 to 23.6 | 20.4 mm | Murray and Beacham, 1987 |
8 | Initial larval size | Mean SL vary at 50% hatching vary with temperature: 18.7 [14°C], 18.5 [11°C], 20.1 [8°C], 19.4 [5°C] | 50.0 mm | Murray and McPhail, 1988 |
9 | Larvae behaviour | Newly hatch larvae stay in the gravel 2-3 weeks until the yolk is absorbed, then become free swimming, and remain in the sapwning area or more dowstream | Demersal | Internet, 2005 |
9 | Larvae behaviour | Inittially fry hide in the gravel and undr banks during daylight hours, then appear along open shorelines and finally move into higher velocity waters along the shore or farther in the sream | Demersal | Groot, 1996 |
9 | Larvae behaviour | The alevins spend 2-3 weeks in the nest while the yolk is absorbed | Demersal | Scott and Crossman, 1973 |
9 | Larvae behaviour | Following hatching the young fry, called alevin, remain in thegravel for several weeks | Demersal | Kerr and Grant, 1999 |
9 | Larvae behaviour | Emerge from gravel a few weeks after hatching | Demersal | Goodyear et al, 1982 |
9 | Larvae behaviour | Swim-up from fertilization: 890 degree-days [From hatching 890 less 420] | Pelagic | Bascinar and Okumus, 2004 |
10 | Reaction to light | Emergence occurs exclusively at night | Photophobic | Kerr and Grant, 1999 |
10 | Reaction to light | The free-embryos of the gravel spawning Oncorhynchus are negatively phototactic in the beginning and hide in the interstitial. After the onset of exogeneous feeding, the young fish become positively phototactic and emerge from the substrate | Photophobic | Bohlen, 2000 |
11 | Temperature during larval development | Alevins can tolerate decreases of temeprature from 10 to 0°C [The upper temperature tolerance limit for egg and larvae is somewhere between 12 and 15°C] | 10.0 °C | Kerr and Grant, 1999 |
11 | Temperature during larval development | Mortality was significantly higher among eggs, fry, and fingerlings of chinhook salmon as temperatures exceeded 60°F, i.e. 15.5°C | 60.0 °C | Allbaugh and Manz, 1964 |
11 | Temperature during larval development | Water temperature during the feeding studies averaged 6 to 12 °C | 12.0 °C | Heming et al, 1982 |
11 | Temperature during larval development | This study refines that recommendation by indicating that temperatures of 12°C are supraoptimal for rearing chinook eggs and alevins. Chinook produced at 12°C experienced reduced survival, hatch and emerge precociously, and are smaller than fish at lower temperatures | 12.0 °C | Heming, 1982 |
13 | Full yolk-sac resorption | 470 [Swim-up from fertilization: 890 degree-days, from hatching 890 less 420] | 470.0 °C * day | Bascinar and Okumus, 2004 |
13 | Full yolk-sac resorption | 870-920 [Thermal units from fertilization at complete yolk absorption averaged 1456 ± 22 among the test temperatures: 250 days (6°C), 180 (8°C), 150 (10°C) and 120 (12°C), minus 95, 71, 55, 44 days for incubation respectively, thus vary between 870-920] | 1456.0 °C * day | Heming et al, 1982 |
13 | Full yolk-sac resorption | 550-570 [Complete yolk absorption: 250 days postfertilization at 6°C, and size of a mean 42.2 (41.8, 42.6); 183 days at 8°C and a mean size of 40.8 (40.5, 41.2), 147 days at 10°C and a mean size of 39.5 (39.1, 39.9), 120 at 12°C ar a mean size of 38.9 (38.5, 39.4), less than 95, 71, 55, 44 for incubation respectively; i.e. 95 [6°C], 71 [8°C], 55 [10°C], 44 [12°] | 560.0 °C * day | Heming, 1982 |
13 | Full yolk-sac resorption | Emergence at 315 DD [3°C], 360 [6°C], 400 [10°C], 396 [12°C] at an average size of 35, range of 33.5-36.5 | 35.0 °C * day | Beacham and Murray, 1990 |
13 | Full yolk-sac resorption | Emergence time vary: 32.1 days [12.1°C], 51.1 [9.3°C], 53 [8.1°C], 87.8 [4.8°C], 90.3 [4.1°C] | 32.1 °C * day | Murray and Beacham, 1987 |
13 | Full yolk-sac resorption | 50% emergence vary: 24.6 [14°C], 37.1 [11°C], 47.9 [8°C], 89.5 [5°C], 114 [2°C]; Mean SL vary at 50% emergence vary with temperature: 27.3 [14°C], 28.6 [11°C], 28.5 [8°C], 30.7 [5°C] and 29 [2°C] | 50.0 °C * day | Murray and McPhail, 1988 |
14 | Onset of exogeneous feeding | 437 [At 12°C], 464 [10°C], 482 [8°C] and 523 [6°C] posu hatching [It would be of little benefit to initiate food presentation before 905 tu, the point at which 50% of alevins were first able to ingest food at all four tested temperature, between 6-12°C, less than about ca.520-556 for incubation; This optimum feeding zone existed at temperatures below 12°C, between 905 thermal units (tu) postfertilization and a point (F, tu) which varied with temperature (T, °C) as F= 1201.1-20.3 T | 9.0 °C * day | Heming et al, 1982 |
14 | Onset of exogeneous feeding | 490 -520 [Exogeneous feeding is presumed to begin shortly after emergence is completed . However, even within the same species, some alevins emerge with considerable yolk while others emerge with virtually none: Number of days to 50% emergence: 192 postfertilization -95 days for incubation [6°C], 136-71 [8°C], 104-55 [10°C] and 85-44 [12°C], i.e. between 97 [6°C], 65 [8°C], 49 [10°C] and 41 [12°C]] | 505.0 °C * day | Heming, 1982 |
Trait id | Trait | Primary Data | Secondary Data | References |
---|---|---|---|---|
15 | Age at sexual maturity | 4-5 | 4.5 year | Barton, 1996 |
15 | Age at sexual maturity | 4-8 [Most female (93%) mature after spending four or five winter ar sea] | 6.0 year | Beacham et al, 1989 |
15 | Age at sexual maturity | 3-7 [Rarely at 2 or 3] | 5.0 year | Hankin et al, 1993 |
16 | Length at sexual maturity | 83.9-91.5 | 87.7 cm | Barton, 1996 |
16 | Length at sexual maturity | The postorbital-hypural length : 73.9.-79.4 with n = 540, i.e. more than 90% of the sample [Complete mean range : 68.6 (n=35), 794 (n=147] | 44.2 cm | Beacham, 1989 |
17 | Weight at sexual maturity | Up to 50 kg | 50.0 kg | Hankin et al, 1993 |
19 | Relative fecundity | From 5.232 to 7.525 [Different populations] | 5.23 thousand eggs/kg | Kinnison et al, 1998 |
20 | Absolute fecundity | 4.8 | 4.8 thousand eggs | Barton, 1996 |
20 | Absolute fecundity | 2-17 wide mean range ! [ Average fecundity of female of the seame size (74 cm) can vary from 4.4 to 9.4] | 9.5 thousand eggs | Groot, 1996 |
20 | Absolute fecundity | 3.2-10.6 | 6.9 thousand eggs | Beacham and Murray, 1993 |
20 | Absolute fecundity | Mean fecundity range between 18 populations used: 3634 to 10622, total range from 1622 to 17255 | 18.0 thousand eggs | Healey and Heard, 1984 |
21 | Oocyte development | Synchronous ovarian develoment, determinate fecundity | Synchronous | Fishbase, 2006 |
24 | Maximum GSI value | From 17.6 to 20.3 [Mean for different populations] | 17.6 percent | Kinnison et al, 1998 |
24 | Maximum GSI value | Mean of 19, range 17.8-21.1, for different populations | 19.45 percent | Fleming, 1998 |
Trait id | Trait | Primary Data | Secondary Data | References |
---|---|---|---|---|
27 | Age at sexual maturity | 3-4 [Most males (81%) mature after spending three or four winters in the ocean] | 3.5 years | Beacham et al, 1989 |
27 | Age at sexual maturity | May mature as early as 2 as "Jacks", through at least 7 | 2.0 years | Hankin et al, 1993 |
27 | Age at sexual maturity | Usually in 2 and 3 [Male specified] | 2.0 years | Kerr and Grant, 1999 |
28 | Length at sexual maturity | The postorbital-hypural length : 58.5-67.9 with n = 929 i.e. 90% of the sample [Complete mean range : 51.0 ± 1.2 (n=54), 85.2 +/ 2 (n=3)] | 51.0 cm | Beacham, 1989 |
28 | Length at sexual maturity | 58-70 [Age 1.2] and 73-89 [Age 1.3] | 64.0 cm | Groot, 1996 |
29 | Weight at sexual maturity | May mature as early as 2 kg as "Jacks", trough at least 50 kg | 2.0 kg | Hankin et al, 1993 |
30 | Male sexual dimorphism | In Salmo, most Salvelinus, and most Oncorhynchus, a major sexual difference is found in the development , in normal breeding individuals, of elongated, hooked jaws with enlarged teeth.An upturned lower jaw is technically called a kype; an enlarged and often distorted upper jaw is termed a snout.Kype and sount development differs not only among individuals but also among species and conspecific populations: it is generally greater in stream-dwelling and anadromous forms than in lake-spawning or strickly freshwater forms.Kypes and snouts are best developed in males, although females of some species also develop smaller ones. Another secondary trait is a hump anterior to dorsal fin, found especially in males. | Present | Willson, 1997 |
30 | Male sexual dimorphism | Males are bigger than females | Absent | Fleming, 1998 |
33 | Maximum GSI value | Mean of 6.1 (range 5.4-6.7%) | 6.05 percent | Fleming, 1998 |
Trait id | Trait | Primary Data | Secondary Data | References |
---|---|---|---|---|
36 | Spawning migration distance | 494-km spawning migration | 494.0 km | Slater et al, 1994 |
36 | Spawning migration distance | From the tidal limit to locations over 1000 km | 1000.0 km | Groot, 1996 |
36 | Spawning migration distance | The adults proceed up river as short a distance as the point just above tidal influence, or as much as 600 miles and over 1200 miles | 600.0 km | Scott and Crossman, 1973 |
36 | Spawning migration distance | Adults migrates up to 4,827 km upstream to spawn | 827.0 km | Fishbase, 2006 |
36 | Spawning migration distance | We estimated that 10 fish spawned from river km 236.7 to 326.0; four fish spawned from river km 201.7 to 203.7 and five fish spawned from tiver km 172.8 to 187.1 | 10.0 km | Berman and Quinn, 1991 |
37 | Spawning migration period | Return to their natal river 6-9 months prior to spawning, as early as February | ['February'] | Slater et al, 1994 |
37 | Spawning migration period | Many river systems have salmon spawning runs that return at diffrent (one to three) times during a year | No data | Groot, 1996 |
37 | Spawning migration period | Maturing chinook salmon move inshore into spawning rivers over most of the year | No data | Scott and Crossman, 1973 |
37 | Spawning migration period | Migration from the sea begins in December so that the first fish are near the river mouths by spring | ['April', 'May', 'June', 'December'] | Fishbase, 2006 |
37 | Spawning migration period | Great lakes chinhook salmon will typically move to the mouths of spawning tributaries in August [Spawning runs occur from late August to mid-October], temperature is usually between 4-18°C | ['August', 'September', 'October'] | Kerr and Grant, 1999 |
37 | Spawning migration period | Congregate near tributary mouths usually in late August or September at about 70°F; upstream migration to spawning grounds may begin as early as mid-July, possibly by drop in stream temperature to 65°F; a spring run also occurs; spring run fish inhabi deep pools in the stream until fall, when they spawn | ['April', 'May', 'June', 'July', 'August', 'September', 'October', 'November', 'December'] | Goodyear et al, 1982 |
37 | Spawning migration period | Enter freswater in spring: February-June | ['February', 'April', 'May', 'June'] | Berman and Quinn, 1991 |
38 | Homing | Return to their natal river | Present | Slater et al, 1994 |
38 | Homing | Homing | Present | Porcher and Baglinière, 2001 |
38 | Homing | Chinook return to their home stream to spawn | Present | Kerr and Grant, 1999 |
38 | Homing | Homing tendency to Pacific salmon to their natal stream | Present | Murray and Beacham, 1987 |
38 | Homing | We assumed that the chinook salmon were all homing to their rivers of origin | Present | Berman and Quinn, 1991 |
39 | Spawning season | All year around because many races are involved | No data | Internet, 2005 |
39 | Spawning season | May to July and September to October : all year round | ['May', 'June', 'July', 'September', 'October'] | Groot, 1996 |
39 | Spawning season | Spawning normally occur in September | ['September'] | Slater et al, 1994 |
39 | Spawning season | From late September to early October | ['September', 'October'] | Scott and Crossman, 1973 |
39 | Spawning season | September to November, also March to May | ['March', 'April', 'May', 'September', 'October', 'November'] | Fishbase, 2006 |
39 | Spawning season | Either spawn in the spring or fall depending on the latitude, in Great lakes generally spawn in the fall | ['April', 'May', 'June', 'October', 'November', 'December'] | Kerr and Grant, 1999 |
39 | Spawning season | Late August-mid November, peaks in October | ['August', 'October', 'November'] | Goodyear et al, 1982 |
39 | Spawning season | Among the species of Oncorhynchus, the salmon are typically late-summer spawners (the exact timing differing among locations and years), although southern chinook populations breed in psring, and some coho populations breed in late winter | ['January', 'February', 'March', 'July', 'August', 'September'] | Willson, 1997 |
39 | Spawning season | Pacific salmon spawn in fall (though this may be as early as July or as late as February, depending on species and region) whereas the Pacific trout species (formely in the genus Salmo) spawn in spring. | ['February', 'April', 'May', 'June', 'July', 'October', 'November', 'December'] | Quinn and Myers, 2004 |
39 | Spawning season | In British Columbia, chinook salmon spawnin in over 260 streams from early August through October | ['August', 'October'] | Murray and Beacham, 1987 |
39 | Spawning season | August-October | ['August', 'October'] | Berman and Quinn, 1991 |
40 | Spawning period duration | Spawning times of females range from 5 to 14 days | 5.0 weeks | Groot, 1996 |
40 | Spawning period duration | Last several weeks | No data | Goodyear et al, 1982 |
41 | Spawning temperature | 10-15 | 12.5 °C | Internet, 2005 |
41 | Spawning temperature | 4.4-18 and 5.6-13.9 | 11.2 °C | Barton, 1996 |
41 | Spawning temperature | Fluctuates between 5.6-13.9°C, the optimum temperatures are 8.0-9.8°C | 9.75 °C | Chebanov and Riddell, 1998 |
41 | Spawning temperature | 50-37°F | 43.5 °C | Goodyear et al, 1982 |
42 | Spawning water type | From large river system to small tributaries 2 to 3 m wide | No category | Groot, 1996 |
42 | Spawning water type | Past, upper reaches of River, also in some tributaries | No category | Internet, 2005 |
42 | Spawning water type | Sites influenced by intrasubstrate flow [with a current not exceeding 2 m/s] | Flowing or turbulent water | Vronskii and Leman, 1991 |
42 | Spawning water type | Large tributaries, near riffles | No category | Scott and Crossman, 1973 |
42 | Spawning water type | Larger mainstream and headwater tributaries [Where water velocities are not less than 0.3 m/s], most frequently at head of riffles | Flowing or turbulent water | Kerr and Grant, 1999 |
42 | Spawning water type | Riffle areas with water velocity of 1-3 fps, in high gradient mid-reaches or headwaters of tributaries; spawning may also occur along lake shore or on shoals | Stagnant water | Goodyear et al, 1982 |
42 | Spawning water type | Streams | No category | Willson, 1997 |
43 | Spawning depth | Several meters depth, but also only a few centimetres of water | No data | Groot, 1996 |
43 | Spawning depth | Shallow riffle areas | No data | Internet, 2005 |
43 | Spawning depth | Spawning sites ate located where water becomes shallow, at the top of a slope of a riffle [About 50-70], bit do not spawn in shallow areas with depths less than 10-15 cm | 60.0 m | Vronskii and Leman, 1991 |
43 | Spawning depth | They tend to spawn on deeper waters than other salmons | No data | Scott and Crossman, 1973 |
43 | Spawning depth | 0.5-4 m | 2.25 m | Kerr and Grant, 1999 |
43 | Spawning depth | 1-6 feet | 3.5 m | Goodyear et al, 1982 |
44 | Spawning substrate | Gravels to coarse gravels | Lithophils | Internet, 2005 |
44 | Spawning substrate | Gravels [Larger gravel siez may occur in large rivers] | Lithophils | Beacham et al, 1989 |
44 | Spawning substrate | Gravel : 1.3-5.1 [80% of the optimal gravel], full range 1.3-10.2 | Lithophils | Groot, 1996 |
44 | Spawning substrate | Does not spawn on coarse rubble (more than 20 cm in diameter) | No category | Vronskii and Leman, 1991 |
44 | Spawning substrate | Larger gravel than other salmons | Lithophils | Scott and Crossman, 1973 |
44 | Spawning substrate | Spawning subrates sizes from fines (0.3 cm) to cobble (15cm) | No category | Kerr and Grant, 1999 |
44 | Spawning substrate | Lithophils | Lithophils | Balon, 1975 |
44 | Spawning substrate | Eggs are deposited in redd dug in gravel and small rubble with good interstitial water flow, little mud or silt | Lithophils | Goodyear et al, 1982 |
45 | Spawning site preparation | Large redds (nests) are constructed by the females | Susbtrate chooser | Internet, 2005 |
45 | Spawning site preparation | Females built nests, and that actively defend | No category | Chebanov and Riddell, 1998 |
45 | Spawning site preparation | The female digs the redd [The males and females are aggressive on the spawning grounds] | Susbtrate chooser | Scott and Crossman, 1973 |
45 | Spawning site preparation | Once a female selects a spot, she begins to dig a nest, driving away other females during the period of nest building | Susbtrate chooser | Fishbase, 2006 |
45 | Spawning site preparation | The female begins to construt a shallow depression in the gravel with her tail | No category | Kerr and Grant, 1999 |
45 | Spawning site preparation | Brood hiders | Susbtrate chooser | Balon, 1975 |
45 | Spawning site preparation | Eggs are deposited in redd dug in substrate | Susbtrate chooser | Goodyear et al, 1982 |
45 | Spawning site preparation | Upon establishing a territory, the female constructs, spawns in, and covers a series of nests (three to eight), and then defends these from other females until her death days to weeks later | No category | Hamon et al, 1999 |
45 | Spawning site preparation | Bury their eggsin gravel redds generally during the fall | Susbtrate chooser | Heming, 1982 |
45 | Spawning site preparation | Nesting by females | No category | Fleming, 1998 |
46 | Nycthemeral period of oviposition | Females paired with large males were observed to participate in a total of 28 spawning events, and 21 (43%) were estimated to have occurred overnight, compared with 26 observed and 18 night spawning events (41%) by females paired with small males | Night | Berejikian et al, 2000 |
47 | Mating system | A dominante male joints the female in the redd and the two engage in the spawing act | No category | Internet, 2005 |
47 | Mating system | The female may dig more than one redd and spawn with more than one male | No category | Scott and Crossman, 1973 |
47 | Mating system | One female with a dominant male, sometimes with smaller males | No category | Fishbase, 2006 |
47 | Mating system | Several males are attracted as the female starts to dig in earnest. The largest male dominates and joins her in the centre of the redd. | No category | Kerr and Grant, 1999 |
48 | Spawning release | Deposited and buried in clusters in gravel | Fractional | Internet, 2005 |
48 | Spawning release | Fertilized eggs are buried under 20-60 cm of gravel, in several times | Multiple | Groot, 1996 |
48 | Spawning release | Buried in the ground at about 25-30 | No category | Vronskii and Leman, 1991 |
48 | Spawning release | The whole process of mating and spawning is repeated until the female releases all her eggs, which may take several days [The male the leaves the female and may mate with another female] | Multiple | Fishbase, 2006 |
48 | Spawning release | Females spawn multiple times in a series of nests, usually comprising a single redd | Multiple | Berejikian et al, 2000 |
49 | Parity | Most die after spawning, although some precocious males have been reported to survive | Semelparous | Groot, 1996 |
49 | Parity | Semelparous | Semelparous | Hankin et al, 1993 |
49 | Parity | Adults die, usually within a few days to weeks | Semelparous | Scott and Crossman, 1973 |
49 | Parity | Spent adults usually die a few days after spawning | Semelparous | Fishbase, 2006 |
49 | Parity | After about a week to ten days or more the adult male and female fish die | Semelparous | Kerr and Grant, 1999 |
49 | Parity | Die soon after spawning | Semelparous | Goodyear et al, 1982 |
49 | Parity | Oncorhynchus species are principally semelparous, | Semelparous | Willson, 1997 |
49 | Parity | All members of the genus Oncorhynchus(including anadromous and non-anadromous forms) die after spawning, and this is true with three exceptions. Firstn the Pacific trout species, are all iteroparous. Second, male masu salmon (O. masou) that mature in fresh water as parr are capable of surviving, migrating to sea, and spawning in subsequent season, though anadromous males and females are semelparous. Third, under experimental conditions male chinhook salmon can mature as parr, survive spawning, grow, and spawn again the following year, and even a third year. | Iteroparous | Quinn and Myers, 2004 |
49 | Parity | 0% of repeat spawners (mature male parr may survive to breed again) | No category | Fleming, 1998 |
50 | Parental care | Female may defend the redd area against other females to 4 to 26 days | Female parental care | Groot, 1996 |
50 | Parental care | The female buries the eggs in loose gravel and remains at the nest for about two weeks or until she dies | No category | Internet, 2005 |
50 | Parental care | The female guards the nest as long as she is able | Male parental care | Scott and Crossman, 1973 |
50 | Parental care | Brood hiders [The eggs are covered and a new nest is made], the female guards the nest for as long as she can | Male parental care | Fishbase, 2006 |
50 | Parental care | The female may guard the redd as long as she is able | Female parental care | Kerr and Grant, 1999 |
50 | Parental care | Postspawning females of Pacific salmon also commonly guard their nests for several days (up to 3 weeks by coho) before they die. | Female parental care | Willson, 1997 |
50 | Parental care | Nests and completed redds are defended against surimposition of nests by other males. Males compete for acess to spawning females, and males abandon their mates in search of other active females shortly after spawning | No care | Berejikian et al, 2000 |
50 | Parental care | The female defends the nests from other females until her death days to weeks later. Male pacific salmon take no part in parental care. Rather they remain sexually active throughout their breeding life span and move amongst breeding females | Male parental care | Hamon et al, 1999 |
50 | Parental care | Females defence after | Female parental care | Fleming, 1998 |