Trait completeness | 88% |
Total data | 168 |
References | 36 |
Author: Fabrice Téletchéa
License: All rights reserved
Trait id | Trait | Primary data | Secondary Data | References |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Oocyte diameter | 4.5-6 | 5.25 mm | Mellinger, 2002 |
1 | Oocyte diameter | 4.5-6.9 | 5.7 mm | Barton, 1996 |
1 | Oocyte diameter | 4.5-6 [Bigger than for most other Pacific salmon] | 5.25 mm | Groot, 1996 |
1 | Oocyte diameter | 5.60-7.0 [Natural range, mean = 6.08-6.87.] | 6.3 mm | Zorbidi, 1988 |
1 | Oocyte diameter | 4.5-6.0 | 5.25 mm | Scott and Crossman, 1973 |
1 | Oocyte diameter | 4.5-6 | 5.25 mm | Fishbase, 2006 |
1 | Oocyte diameter | 5.186 ± 0.263 for oocytes at the final maturation stage [For broodstock population cultured in a fish farm in Southern Chile] | 5.19 mm | Estay et all., 1998 |
1 | Oocyte diameter | Eggs in ovarian sac: means in different populations range from 5.1±0.2 to 7.2±0.2 other studies: 6.1 to 7.4] | 5.1 mm | Stauffer, 1976 |
2 | Egg size after water-hardening | 7-7.5 [Diamter of presumptive fertilized and water-hardened egg] | 7.25 mm | Morrison et al, 1985 |
2 | Egg size after water-hardening | 6.2-8.7 with n=1465 eggs mesured | 7.45 mm | Murray et al, 1990 |
2 | Egg size after water-hardening | 7-8.35 [Water-hardened egg] | 7.67 mm | Beacham and Murray, 1993 |
2 | Egg size after water-hardening | Diameters of swollen eggs range from 0.261 to 0.308 inches | 0.26 mm | Allen, 1958 |
3 | Egg Buoyancy | Demersal | Demersal | Scott and Crossman, 1973 |
3 | Egg Buoyancy | Soon absorb water, becoming water hardened and semi-buoyant | Pelagic | Kerr and Grant, 1999 |
3 | Egg Buoyancy | The eggs of Salmonidae are buried in unguarded nests called 'redds' and are demersal-nonadheive | Demersal | Kunz, 2004 |
4 | Egg adhesiveness | Eggs are temporatily adhesive, but soon absorb water, becoming water hardened and semi-buoyant | Adhesive | Kerr and Grant, 1999 |
4 | Egg adhesiveness | The eggs of Salmonidae are buried in unguarded nests called 'redds' and are demersal-nonadheive | Non-Adhesive | Kunz, 2004 |
4 | Egg adhesiveness | Salmonidae, whose eggs are not sticky | Non-Adhesive | Woynarovich, 1962 |
5 | Incubation time | 137 [In natural conditions with T ranging from 0-3.5°C] | 1.75 days | Groot, 1996 |
5 | Incubation time | 35-50, and as much as 115 | 42.5 days | Scott and Crossman, 1973 |
5 | Incubation time | 6 or 7 weeks | 6.0 days | Fishbase, 2006 |
5 | Incubation time | 150-165 | 157.5 days | Granath et al, 2004 |
5 | Incubation time | 2-5 months at 32-36°F | 3.5 days | Goodyear et al, 1982 |
5 | Incubation time | 93.6 [5°C], 63.1 [7.5°C], 45.9 [10°C] and 35.6 [12.5°C] for 50% hatch | 93.6 days | Jensen, 1980 |
5 | Incubation time | 130 [3°C], 70 [6°C], 50 [10°C], 40 [12°C] | 130.0 days | Beacham and Murray, 1990 |
5 | Incubation time | 31.5 [14°C], 42 [11°C], 62.7 [8.0°C], 86.9 [5.0°C], 114.7 [2.0°C] | 31.5 days | Murray and McPhail, 1988 |
5 | Incubation time | Egg development from fertilization to 50% hatch at various constant temperatures: 147 days [At 3.0°C], 78.3 days [At 6°C], 58 days [At 8.4°C], 44 days [At 10.2°C], 32 days [At 14.4°C] | 50.0 days | Velsen,1987 |
6 | Temperature for incubation | 4.4-13.3 | 8.85 °C | Barton, 1996 |
6 | Temperature for incubation | 4-11 [Optimal temperature] | 7.5 °C | Groot, 1996 |
6 | Temperature for incubation | 4.0-6.6 [in natural conditions, rarely below 4°] | 5.3 °C | Zorbidi, 1988 |
6 | Temperature for incubation | 8.9-10.7 | 9.8 °C | Scott and Crossman, 1973 |
6 | Temperature for incubation | The highest survival were recorded at 4 or 5°C, and were usually over 58% at 2, 4, 5 and 8°C [Complete mortality was recorded at 14 and 15°C] | 4.0 °C | Murray et al, 1990 |
6 | Temperature for incubation | 32-36°F; i.e. 0-2.2 °C | 1.1 °C | Goodyear et al, 1982 |
6 | Temperature for incubation | 5-12.5 | 8.75 °C | Jensen, 1980 |
6 | Temperature for incubation | Optimum temperature of yolk conversion is about 4°C | 4.0 °C | Beacham and Murray, 1993 |
6 | Temperature for incubation | Egg mortality during incubation from fertilization to 50% hatch at various temperatures: 13.8% [At 3.0°C], 17.5% [At 6°C], 7.5% [At 10°C], 100% [At 17°C] | 50.0 °C | Velsen,1987 |
6 | Temperature for incubation | Embryo survival at hatching following incubation at 1.3-1.4°C usually does not differ significantly from the optimum at 4-8°C | 1.35 °C | Babiak and Dabrowski, 2003 |
7 | Degree-days for incubation | 417 | 417.0 °C * day | Barton, 1996 |
7 | Degree-days for incubation | 380-440 [38 days at 10.7°C, 48 at 8.9°C] | 410.0 °C * day | Scott and Crossman, 1973 |
7 | Degree-days for incubation | 51-68 [At 8°C] to 149-185 [At 2°C] | 59.5 °C * day | Murray et al, 1990 |
7 | Degree-days for incubation | 444.8-473.6 [Between 5-12.5°C] | 459.2 °C * day | Jensen, 1980 |
7 | Degree-days for incubation | 420 | 420.0 °C * day | Bascinar and Okumus, 2004 |
7 | Degree-days for incubation | 390 [3°C], 420 [6°C], 500 [10°C], 480 [12°C] | 390.0 °C * day | Beacham and Murray, 1990 |
7 | Degree-days for incubation | 476 [Effective day-degrees] | 476.0 °C * day | Kamler, 2002 |
Trait id | Trait | Primary Data | Secondary Data | References |
---|---|---|---|---|
8 | Initial larval size | 17.5 to 19.4 at hatching | 17.5 mm | Murray et al, 1990 |
8 | Initial larval size | Average 21.5, range 19.5-23.5 | 21.5 mm | Beacham and Murray, 1990 |
8 | Initial larval size | 22-24 [1 week post-hatch alevins] | 23.0 mm | Morrison et al, 1985 |
8 | Initial larval size | 30 [Emerging fry] | 30.0 mm | Groot, 1996 |
8 | Initial larval size | 6.0-12.0 [Variation embryonic length in natural conditions, mean = 9.0-10.7] | 9.0 mm | Zorbidi, 1988 |
8 | Initial larval size | Mean SL vary at 50% hatching vary with temperature: 15.3 [14°C], 16 [11°C], 17.4 [8°C], 18.4 [5°C], 19.1 [2°C] | 50.0 mm | Murray and McPhail, 1988 |
9 | Larvae behaviour | After hatching, tha alevins move down into the gravel and then hold for several weeks [emergence primarily occur at night] | Demersal | Groot, 1996 |
9 | Larvae behaviour | The alevin remain 2-3 weeks in the gravel, at least until yolk is absorbed | Demersal | Scott and Crossman, 1973 |
9 | Larvae behaviour | The young fish, called alevins, remain under the gravel until they are anywhere from two weeks to four months old | Demersal | Kerr and Grant, 1999 |
9 | Larvae behaviour | Remain in the gravel until yolk is absorbed | Demersal | Goodyear et al, 1982 |
9 | Larvae behaviour | Swim-up from fertilization: 970 degree-days [From hatching 970 less 420] | Pelagic | Bascinar and Okumus, 2004 |
10 | Reaction to light | The free-embryos of the gravel spawning Oncorhynchus are negatively phototactic in the beginning and hide in the interstitial. After the onset of exogeneous feeding, the young fish become positively phototactic and emerge from the substrate | Photophobic | Bohlen, 2000 |
11 | Temperature during larval development | Conversion of yolk to tissue was maximized at 4°C and for another at 4.7-6.5°C, their study between 4 and 8°C | 5.6 °C | Murray et al, 1990 |
13 | Full yolk-sac resorption | 550 [Swim-up from fertilization: 970 degree-days, from hatching 970 less 420] | 550.0 °C * day | Bascinar and Okumus, 2004 |
13 | Full yolk-sac resorption | Emergence 390 DD [3°C], 420 [6°C], 500 [10°C], 480 [12°C] at an average size of 32, range 29-35 | 32.0 °C * day | Beacham and Murray, 1990 |
13 | Full yolk-sac resorption | 50% emergence at 29.7 [14°C], 31.7 [11°C], 46.4 [8°C], 51.6 [5°C], 113.3 [2.°C] Mean SL vary at 50% emergence vary with temperature: 23.9 [14°C], 24.9 [11°C], 25.9 [8°C], 27.1 [5°C] and 27.9 [2°C] | 50.0 °C * day | Murray and McPhail, 1988 |
Trait id | Trait | Primary Data | Secondary Data | References |
---|---|---|---|---|
15 | Age at sexual maturity | 3-4 | 3.5 year | Barton, 1996 |
15 | Age at sexual maturity | Usually mature at 3 | 3.0 year | MacQuarrie et al, 1978 |
16 | Length at sexual maturity | 45.7-61 | 53.35 cm | Barton, 1996 |
16 | Length at sexual maturity | 41-67 | 54.0 cm | Groot, 1996 |
16 | Length at sexual maturity | 40.3 ±2.3 [n=30 artificial conditions] | 40.3 cm | MacQuarrie et al, 1978 |
16 | Length at sexual maturity | Length reached by wild coho salmon at maturation ranges from 60 to 90 cm, and 62.3 ± 2.5 cm for cultured females int this study | 62.3 cm | Estay et al, 1998 |
16 | Length at sexual maturity | Average total length means in different populations range from 51.2 to 79.3 | 51.2 cm | Stauffer, 1976 |
16 | Length at sexual maturity | Fork length of the female studied range from 44 to 74 cm | 74.0 cm | Allen, 1958 |
16 | Length at sexual maturity | Average fork length in different populations range from 55.1 to 72.8 | 55.1 cm | Crone and Bond, 1976 |
17 | Weight at sexual maturity | 3.0-5.5 | 4.25 kg | Groot, 1996 |
17 | Weight at sexual maturity | 0.789 ± 0.139 [n=30, artificial conditions] | 0.79 kg | MacQuarrie et al, 1978 |
17 | Weight at sexual maturity | Weight reached by wild coho salmon at maturation ranges from 2.5 to 6 kg, and 3.52 ± 0.53 kg for cultured females in this study | 3.52 kg | Estay et al, 1998 |
19 | Relative fecundity | 0.943-1.060 [in artificial conditions] | 1.0 thousand eggs/kg | MacQuarrie et al, 1978 |
19 | Relative fecundity | 0.75-1.2 | 0.97 thousand eggs/kg | Morrison et al, 1985 |
20 | Absolute fecundity | 2.1-2.8 | 2.45 thousand eggs | Barton, 1996 |
20 | Absolute fecundity | 2-5 | 3.5 thousand eggs | Groot, 1996 |
20 | Absolute fecundity | 2.1-2.789 | 2.44 thousand eggs | Scott and Crossman, 1973 |
20 | Absolute fecundity | 2-4 | 3.0 thousand eggs | Morrison et al, 1985 |
20 | Absolute fecundity | 2.07-3.47 | 2.77 thousand eggs | Beacham and Murray, 1993 |
20 | Absolute fecundity | Means in different populations range from 2.267±0.251 to 2.998 ± 0.355 | 2.27 thousand eggs | Stauffer, 1976 |
20 | Absolute fecundity | Range from 1.44 [Size of the female 44 cm] to 5.7 [Size 72 cm] | 1.44 thousand eggs | Allen, 1958 |
20 | Absolute fecundity | Means obtained in different populations range from: 1.983 to 5.343 | 1.98 thousand eggs | Crone and Bond, 1976 |
21 | Oocyte development | Synchronous ovarian organization, determinate fecunidy | Synchronous | Fishbase, 2006 |
22 | Onset of oogenesis | In December for broodstock population cultured in a fish farm in Southern Chile | ['December'] | Estay et all., 1998 |
23 | Intensifying oogenesis activity | In February-March for broodstock population cultured in a fish farm in Southern Chile | ['February', 'March'] | Estay et all., 1998 |
24 | Maximum GSI value | From 22.8 ± 2.6 to 32.5 ± 2.8 [Not specified if maximal values] | 22.8 percent | Morrison et al, 1985 |
24 | Maximum GSI value | 16.4 ± 4.1 [In May for broodstock population cultured in a fish farm in Southern Chile] and 23.87 ±3.21% | 16.4 percent | Estay et all., 1998 |
24 | Maximum GSI value | Mean of 20.7 (range 19.4-24.0) for different populations | 21.7 percent | Fleming, 1998 |
26 | Resting period | In June to November for broodstock population cultured in a fish farm in Southern Chile | 7.0 months | Estay et all., 1998 |
Trait id | Trait | Primary Data | Secondary Data | References |
---|---|---|---|---|
27 | Age at sexual maturity | 3-4 | 3.5 years | Barton, 1996 |
27 | Age at sexual maturity | Usually mature at 3 but sometimes at 2 | 3.0 years | MacQuarrie et al, 1978 |
28 | Length at sexual maturity | 45.7-61 | 53.35 cm | Barton, 1996 |
28 | Length at sexual maturity | 41-67 [average] | 54.0 cm | Groot, 1996 |
28 | Length at sexual maturity | 38 ± 25 [n=13, artificial conditions] | 38.0 cm | MacQuarrie et al, 1978 |
28 | Length at sexual maturity | Length reached by wild coho salmon at maturation ranges from 60 to 90 cm, and 66.0 cm cm for cultured females in this study | 90.0 cm | Estay et al, 1998 |
29 | Weight at sexual maturity | 3.0-5.5 [average] | 4.25 kg | Groot, 1996 |
29 | Weight at sexual maturity | 0.63±0.124 [n=13, artificial conditions] | 0.63 kg | MacQuarrie et al, 1978 |
29 | Weight at sexual maturity | Weight reached by wild coho salmon at maturation ranges from 2.5 to 6 kg, and 3.87 ± 0.66 kg for cultured males in this study | 3.87 kg | Estay et al, 1998 |
30 | Male sexual dimorphism | In Salmo, most Salvelinus, and most Oncorhynchus, a major sexual difference is found in the development , in normal breeding individuals, of elongated, hooked jaws with enlarged teeth.An upturned lower jaw is technically called a kype; an enlarged and often distorted upper jaw is termed a snout.Kype and sount development differs not only among individuals but also among species and conspecific populations: it is generally greater in stream-dwelling and anadromous forms than in lake-spawning or strickly freshwater forms.Kypes andsnouts are best developed in males, although females of some species also develop smaller ones. Another secondarytrait is a hump anterior to dorsal fin, found especially in males. | Present | Willson, 1997 |
30 | Male sexual dimorphism | Males are bigger than females | Absent | Fleming, 1998 |
31 | Onset of spermatogenesis | In November [For broodstock population cultured in fish farm in southern Chile] | ['November'] | Estay et al, 1998 |
32 | Main spermatogenesis activity | In February-March [For broodstock population cultured in fish farm in southern Chile] | ['February', 'March'] | Estay et al, 1998 |
33 | Maximum GSI value | From 4.3 ± 0.3 to 6.1 ± 0.2 [Not specified if maximal values] | 4.3 percent | Morrison et al, 1985 |
33 | Maximum GSI value | 8.4 ± 0.8% [For broodstock population cultured in fish farm in southern Chile] | 8.4 percent | Estay et al, 1998 |
33 | Maximum GSI value | Mean of 5.8% (range 5.2-6.4) for different populations | 5.8 percent | Fleming, 1998 |
Trait id | Trait | Primary Data | Secondary Data | References |
---|---|---|---|---|
36 | Spawning migration distance | Mostly do not travel more than 150 miles from the sea in large rivers | 150.0 km | Scott and Crossman, 1973 |
37 | Spawning migration period | The spawning run may begin in late August but heavy runs up tributaries are observed between mid-September and mid-November | ['August', 'September', 'October', 'November'] | Kerr and Grant, 1999 |
37 | Spawning migration period | Congrate off tributary mouths in August and September, ascend tributaries to spawning grounds usually in September but sometimes in August, movement into tributaries correlated with increased flow | ['August', 'September'] | Goodyear et al, 1982 |
37 | Spawning migration period | ggenerally enter Sashin Creek from early August to early November, but the greatest numbers enter from late August to mid-October. | ['August', 'September', 'October', 'November'] | Crone and Bond, 1976 |
38 | Homing | Migrates late in the season and over a prolonged period: from earlt September to early October | Absent | Scott and Crossman, 1973 |
38 | Homing | About 85% of the spawners home to their natal stream | Present | Scott and Crossman, 1973 |
38 | Homing | Returns to natal stream to spawn | Present | Kerr and Grant, 1999 |
39 | Spawning season | Can last from October to March, but most populations spawn between November and January [Spawn over a longer period than other Pacific slamon] | ['January', 'February', 'March', 'October', 'November'] | Groot, 1996 |
39 | Spawning season | December 9-21 in captivity [normal conditions: October to January] | ['January', 'October', 'November', 'December'] | MacQuarrie et al, 1978 |
39 | Spawning season | October to March, but usually October to November, ot November to January | ['January', 'February', 'March', 'October', 'November'] | Scott and Crossman, 1973 |
39 | Spawning season | Spawning in British Columbia typically peaks in November and December when autumn rains have raised water levels, but spawning may continue at low levels into January or as late as March | ['January', 'March', 'October', 'November', 'December'] | Murray et al, 1990 |
39 | Spawning season | Lake Erie spawn from early November to mid-December | ['November', 'December'] | Kerr and Grant, 1999 |
39 | Spawning season | Mid-September to January; spawning usually peaks in October-November; low temperature in early winter can delay spawning until speing | ['January', 'February', 'March', 'September', 'October', 'November'] | Goodyear et al, 1982 |
39 | Spawning season | Among the species of Oncorhynchus, the salmon are typically late-summer spawners (the exact timing differing among locations and years), although southern chinook populations breed in psring, and some coho populations breed in late winter | ['January', 'February', 'March', 'July', 'August', 'September'] | Willson, 1997 |
39 | Spawning season | Pacific salmon spawn in fall (though this may be as early as July or as late as February, depending on species and region) whereas the Pacific trout species (formely in the genus Salmo) spawn in spring. | ['February', 'April', 'May', 'June', 'July', 'October', 'November', 'December'] | Quinn and Myers, 2004 |
39 | Spawning season | Spawning usually begins early in October and ends in mid-November | ['October', 'November'] | Crone and Bond, 1976 |
40 | Spawning period duration | A 90-day period | 90.0 weeks | Goodyear et al, 1982 |
40 | Spawning period duration | The mean redd life for 56 females was 13 days (range of 6 to 21). In 1967, 151 females remained an average of 11 days on the spawning riffles (range of 3 to 24 days) | 56.0 weeks | Crone and Bond, 1976 |
41 | Spawning temperature | 4.4-9.4 or 7-13 | 6.9 °C | Barton, 1996 |
41 | Spawning temperature | Usually between 6-12 [Ranging from 0.8-7.7 in Kamchatka and 5.6-13.3 in California] | 9.0 °C | Groot, 1996 |
41 | Spawning temperature | 0.8-14.4 | 7.6 °C | Murray et al, 1990 |
41 | Spawning temperature | Between 1-10°C, mostly 7.8-11.1 | 5.5 °C | Kerr and Grant, 1999 |
41 | Spawning temperature | Falling from 57-40°F, i.e., 4.5-14°C | 48.5 °C | Goodyear et al, 1982 |
42 | Spawning water type | Numerous small coastal streams, in large rivers, and in remote tributaries [water velocities vary from 18 to 76 cm/s] | Flowing or turbulent water | Groot, 1996 |
42 | Spawning water type | Avoid place with slow current and prefer spawning in the river channels in more rapid current | Flowing or turbulent water | Zorbidi, 1988 |
42 | Spawning water type | Outlets of groundwater | No category | Vronskii and Leman, 1991 |
42 | Spawning water type | Swifter water of river tributaries | No category | Scott and Crossman, 1973 |
42 | Spawning water type | Prefers smaller fresh water streams with lower velocities than O. tshawytscha | Flowing or turbulent water | Kerr and Grant, 1999 |
42 | Spawning water type | Riffles, with water velocity of 0.25-2.5fps, in mid-reaches or headwaters of streams, also reported along shore in St. Lawrence River | Stagnant water | Goodyear et al, 1982 |
42 | Spawning water type | Streams | No category | Willson, 1997 |
42 | Spawning water type | Coastal streams | No category | Crone and Bond, 1976 |
43 | Spawning depth | Range from 10 to 45 cm | 10.0 m | Groot, 1996 |
43 | Spawning depth | Shallow | No data | Scott and Crossman, 1973 |
43 | Spawning depth | 0.05-0.66 m [Prefers shallower streams than O. tshawytscha] | 0.36 m | Kerr and Grant, 1999 |
43 | Spawning depth | Minimum depth reported as 6 in ches, and also as shallow as 2 inches | 6.0 m | Goodyear et al, 1982 |
44 | Spawning substrate | Gravel [acceptable gravel substrate-size ranges are 1.310.2 cm, 3.8-12.7 cm, and 7.5-15.0 cm for different salmon-spawning streams] | Lithophils | Groot, 1996 |
44 | Spawning substrate | Gravelly areas | Lithophils | Scott and Crossman, 1973 |
44 | Spawning substrate | 2-15 cm is the optimal spawning substrate [Prefers smaller substrates than O. tshawytscha] | No category | Kerr and Grant, 1999 |
44 | Spawning substrate | Lithophils | Lithophils | Balon, 1975 |
44 | Spawning substrate | Eggs are deposited in redd dug in clean, small or mediu-sized gravel; fine sediment detrimental to reproductive success | Lithophils | Goodyear et al, 1982 |
45 | Spawning site preparation | Female prepared nets in area with ground water seepage at the head of a riffle | No category | Groot, 1996 |
45 | Spawning site preparation | The nest is built by the female [Male and female are very aggressive on the spawning grounds] | No category | Scott and Crossman, 1973 |
45 | Spawning site preparation | The female finds a spot and digs a pitt [At this point she is aggresive toward other females] | Susbtrate chooser | Fishbase, 2006 |
45 | Spawning site preparation | Once a site is selected, the females begins to construct a shallow depression in the gravel with her tail | No category | Kerr and Grant, 1999 |
45 | Spawning site preparation | Brood hiders | Susbtrate chooser | Balon, 1975 |
45 | Spawning site preparation | Upon establishing a territory, the female constructs, spawns in, and covers a series of nests (three to eight), and then defends these from other females until her death days to weeks later | No category | Hamon et al, 1999 |
45 | Spawning site preparation | Nest made by females | No category | Fleming, 1998 |
47 | Mating system | The basic matting pattern seems to be positive assotative mating. With a considerable predominance of males, negative assortative mating simultaneously also occurs. [The nature of spawning behavior, assortative mating, and spawning success in coho salmon under natural conditions is similar to that of cham and pink salmons under experimental conditions] | No category | Chebanov, 1990 |
47 | Mating system | The female may spawn in as many as four different nests, probably with different males | No category | Scott and Crossman, 1973 |
47 | Mating system | The pair are side by side, the whole process is repeated for several days until the female deposists all her eggs [The male then leaves and may seek another female] | No category | Fishbase, 2006 |
48 | Spawning release | Eggs are buried at depths ranging from 18 to 39 cm and aredd can contain four to five egg pockets | No category | Groot, 1996 |
49 | Parity | Soon after spawning is completed the adults die | Semelparous | Scott and Crossman, 1973 |
49 | Parity | Adult salmon spawn only once, then die | Semelparous | Kerr and Grant, 1999 |
49 | Parity | None die soon after spawning | Semelparous | Goodyear et al, 1982 |
49 | Parity | Oncorhynchus species are principally semelparous, | Semelparous | Willson, 1997 |
49 | Parity | All members of the genus Oncorhynchus(including anadromous and non-anadromous forms) die after spawning, and this is true with three exceptions. Firstn the Pacific trout species, are all iteroparous. Second, male masu salmon (O. masou) that mature in fresh water as parr are capable of surviving, migrating to sea, and spawning in subsequent season, though anadromous males and females are semelparous. Third, under experimental conditions male chinhook salmon can mature as parr, survive spawning, grow, and spawn again the following year, and even a third year. | Iteroparous | Quinn and Myers, 2004 |
49 | Parity | 0% of repeat spawners | No category | Fleming, 1998 |
50 | Parental care | After covering the nest the female guards it as long as she is able | Male parental care | Scott and Crossman, 1973 |
50 | Parental care | Cover the eggs | No category | Fishbase, 2006 |
50 | Parental care | Postspawning females of Pacific salmon also commonly guard their nests for several days (up to 3 weeks by coho) before they die. | Female parental care | Willson, 1997 |
50 | Parental care | The female defends the nests from other females until her death days to weeks later. Male pacific salmon take no part in parental care. Rather they remain sexually active throughout their breeding life span and move amongst breeding females | Male parental care | Hamon et al, 1999 |
50 | Parental care | Nest guarding time was similar for hatchery (mean 4.89 days) and wild females (5.10 days] | No category | Fleming and Gross, 1992 |
50 | Parental care | Female defence after | Female parental care | Fleming, 1998 |