Trait completeness | 88% |
Total data | 201 |
References | 39 |
Author: Fabrice Téletchéa
License: All rights reserved
Trait id | Trait | Primary data | Secondary Data | References |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Oocyte diameter | 6 | 6.0 mm | Mellinger, 2002 |
1 | Oocyte diameter | 6 | 6.0 mm | Barton, 1996 |
1 | Oocyte diameter | 5.40-6.07 [n=232] | 5.74 mm | Kaev and Kaeva, 1986 |
1 | Oocyte diameter | 6 | 6.0 mm | Scott and Crossman, 1973 |
1 | Oocyte diameter | 6 | 6.0 mm | Fishbase, 2006 |
2 | Egg size after water-hardening | Different means: 7.08 ± 0.04 (N=30), 7.11 ± 0.04 (N=30), 6.96 ± 0.02 -N=90), 7.16 ± 0.03 (N=90); 7.04 ± 0.03 (N=90); 7.24 ± 0.02 (N=90); and 7.07 ± 0.03 (N=90) [Water hardened egg] | 7.08 mm | Murray and Beacham, 1986 |
2 | Egg size after water-hardening | The average diameter of eggs was 6.38 ± 0.28 [Fertilized eggs after being water hardened for an hour] | 6.38 mm | Kwain, 1982 |
3 | Egg Buoyancy | Demersal | Demersal | Groot, 1996 |
3 | Egg Buoyancy | Demersal | Demersal | Scott and Crossman, 1973 |
3 | Egg Buoyancy | The eggs of Salmonidae are buried in unguarded nests called 'redds' and are demersal-nonadheive | Demersal | Kunz, 2004 |
4 | Egg adhesiveness | During water hardening the egg capsule becomes highly adhesive for about 20 minutes | Adhesive | Groot, 1996 |
4 | Egg adhesiveness | The eggs of Salmonidae are buried in unguarded nests called 'redds' and are demersal-nonadheive | Non-Adhesive | Kunz, 2004 |
4 | Egg adhesiveness | Salmonidae, whose eggs are not sticky | Non-Adhesive | Woynarovich, 1962 |
5 | Incubation time | 103 [10°C], 139 [7°C], 195 [4°C] | 103.0 days | Groot, 1996 |
5 | Incubation time | 74-76 at 8°C for 50% hatching with n = 6543 [124-128 at 4°C and 52-54 at 12°C] | 75.0 days | Beacham and Murray, 1986 |
5 | Incubation time | 61-130 days at 4.5°C | 95.5 days | Fishbase, 2006 |
5 | Incubation time | 109.0 [5°C], 80.9 [7.5°C], 63.0 [10°C] and 54.0 [12.5°C] for 50% hatch | 109.0 days | Jensen, 1997 |
5 | Incubation time | 54.8 [10.5°C], 58 [9.6°C], 61.8 [9.7°C], 74.3 [7.3°C], 80.5 [6.0°C], 87.7 [5.2°C], 96.6 [5.1°C] and 133.6 [2.9°C] | 54.8 days | Murray and Beacham, 1986 |
5 | Incubation time | 140 [3°C], 95 [6°C], 69 [10°C], 58 [12°C] deduced from graph | 140.0 days | Beacham and Murray, 1990 |
5 | Incubation time | 50% hatch at: 39.8 [14°C], 47.2 [11°C], 72.2 [8°C], 99 [5°C] | 50.0 days | Murray and McPhail, 1988 |
5 | Incubation time | 9-10 weeks at 12± 0.5°C | 12.0 days | Macquarrie et al, 1979 |
5 | Incubation time | 74 [7°C], 69 [9°C], 62 [11°C], 51 [13°C] and 47 [15°C] | 74.0 days | Kwain, 1982 |
5 | Incubation time | Egg development from fertilization to 50% hatch at various constant temperatures: 125 days [At 3.0°C], 98.8 days [At 6°C], 74 days [At 8°C], 61 days [At 10.4°C], 47 days [At 15°C] | 50.0 days | Velsen,1987 |
6 | Temperature for incubation | 7-10°C [Deformities occur when eggs are incubated at low temperatures : 3-4.5°C | 8.5 °C | Groot, 1996 |
6 | Temperature for incubation | 8-10.5 | 9.25 °C | Barton, 1996 |
6 | Temperature for incubation | 8°C is the optimum with n = 6543 [Poorest egg survival in all stocks occurred at 4°C and 12°C] | 8.0 °C | Beacham and Murray, 1986 |
6 | Temperature for incubation | 5-12.5 | 8.75 °C | Jensen, 1997 |
6 | Temperature for incubation | Optimum temperature of yolk conversion is about 8°C | 8.0 °C | Beacham and Murray, 1993 |
6 | Temperature for incubation | Could tolerate a temperature of 0.5 if previously incubated at 5.5°C [Both chinook and pink salmon eggs could tolerate temperatures as low as 33°F for long periods if the intial incubating temperature had been above 42°F]] | 0.5 °C | Combs, 1965 |
6 | Temperature for incubation | The embryos were incubated at 15°C for 10 days until epiloby was complete, then the temperature was lowered 0.5°C every 2 days until a 9°C incubation temperature was obtained, and the embryos were maintained at 9°C until hatching | 15.0 °C | Beacham and Murray, 1987 |
6 | Temperature for incubation | Incubated at different temperature from 2.9 to 9.6 | 2.9 °C | Murray and Beacham, 1986 |
6 | Temperature for incubation | Incubated at 12 ± 0.5 | 12.0 °C | Macquarrie et al, 1979 |
6 | Temperature for incubation | Incubated at 7, 9, 11, 13 and 15, yet 15°C is considered to be the upper limit for Great Lakes pink salmon egg incubation [embryos of sea-run pink salmon can tolerate near-zero temperatures provided early development has occurred within the preferred temperature range from 7 to 10°C] | 7.0 °C | Kwain, 1982 |
6 | Temperature for incubation | Egg mortality during incubation from fertilization to 50% hatch at various temperatures: 82% [At 3.0°C], 11.5% [At 6.5°C], 2.3% [At 11°C], 70.5% [At 16°C] | 50.0 °C | Velsen,1987 |
7 | Degree-days for incubation | 500 | 500.0 °C * day | Barton, 1996 |
7 | Degree-days for incubation | 592-608 [at 8°C, n= 6543] | 600.0 °C * day | Beacham and Murray, 1986 |
7 | Degree-days for incubation | 780-1030 | 905.0 °C * day | Groot, 1996 |
7 | Degree-days for incubation | 545.0-674.9 [Between 5-12.5] | 609.95 °C * day | Jensen, 1997 |
7 | Degree-days for incubation | 500 | 500.0 °C * day | Bascinar and Okumus, 2004 |
7 | Degree-days for incubation | 556 [9.6°C], 483 [6.0°C] and 492 [5.1°C] [58 at 9.6°C, 80.5 at 6.0°C, 96.6 at 5.1°C] | 556.0 °C * day | Murray and Beacham, 1986 |
7 | Degree-days for incubation | 420 [3°C], 570 [6°C], 690 [10°C], 696 [12°C] deduced from graph | 420.0 °C * day | Beacham and Murray, 1990 |
7 | Degree-days for incubation | 769 [Effective day-degrees] | 769.0 °C * day | Kamler, 2002 |
2 | Egg size after water-hardening | 4-7.9 | 5.95 mm | Heard, 1991 |
2 | Egg size after water-hardening | ~6.00 | 6.0 mm | Scott and Crossman, 1998 |
2 | Egg size after water-hardening | 6.90 | 6.9 mm | Heard, 1991 |
4 | Egg adhesiveness | Adhesive | Adhesive | Heard, 1991 |
7 | Degree-days for incubation | 100 to 162 degree-days | 100.0 °C * day | Heard, 1991 |
7 | Degree-days for incubation | 5.08-5.3; 100-120 | 570.9 °C * day | Heard, 1991 |
Trait id | Trait | Primary Data | Secondary Data | References |
---|---|---|---|---|
8 | Initial larval size | SL means range from 15.9 ± 0.1 to 19.7 ± 0.14 | 15.9 mm | Murray and Beacham, 1986 |
8 | Initial larval size | Average 21.5, range of 19.5 to 24 | 21.5 mm | Beacham and Murray, 1990 |
8 | Initial larval size | Mean SL vary at 50% hatching vary with temperature: 15.8 [14°C], 16.8 [11°C], 17.5 [8°C], 17.8 [5°C] | 50.0 mm | Murray and McPhail, 1988 |
8 | Initial larval size | Total length of newly emergedfry from the Steel River averaged 30.1 ±0.9 | 30.1 mm | Kwain, 1982 |
9 | Larvae behaviour | The fry emerge from the gravel at night, mainly in April and May, and immediatly migrate to sea | Demersal | Groot, 1996 |
9 | Larvae behaviour | The alevins remain in the gravel until the yolk is absorbed in April or early May (rarely late February) when they struggle up out of the nest and become free swimming)] | Demersal | Scott and Crossman, 1973 |
9 | Larvae behaviour | Remain in the gravel until yolk is absorbed, emerge in April-May, mainly mid-April | Demersal | Goodyear et al, 1982 |
9 | Larvae behaviour | Swim-up from fertilization: 805 degree-days [From hatching 805 less 500] | Pelagic | Bascinar and Okumus, 2004 |
9 | Larvae behaviour | Upon hatching the alevins migrated through the spawces in the base of each basket into the gravel where they remained until 80-90% of their yolk had been absorbed | Demersal | Macquarrie et al, 1979 |
10 | Reaction to light | If salt water is not reach during the first night, the fry will hide in the gravel during daylight hours: thus only nightly "jumps" [Once in the estuary, the behavior change, the fry become light-adapted and start to swim around during daylights in schools] | Photophobic | Groot, 1996 |
10 | Reaction to light | The pink salmon young migrated mainly during the night | Photophobic | Zolotukhin, 1993 |
10 | Reaction to light | Larvae emerging from the higher spawning grounds hide in the gravel by day, become active at bight | Photopositive | Scott and Crossman, 1973 |
10 | Reaction to light | The free-embryos of the gravel spawning Oncorhynchus are negatively phototactic in the beginning and hide in the interstitial. After the onset of exogeneous feeding, the young fish become positively phototactic and emerge from the substrate | Photophobic | Bohlen, 2000 |
11 | Temperature during larval development | 8-12°C | 10.0 °C | Beacham and Murray, 1986 |
11 | Temperature during larval development | Once hatching was complete, the temperature in the incubator was increased 0.5°C every 2 days until a target of 13.5°C was reached, and then the alevins were maintained at this temperature until 50% had the yolk sac completely covered wtih chromatophores | 0.5 °C | Beacham and Murray, 1987 |
11 | Temperature during larval development | Reared at 11 ±1°C | 11.0 °C | Macquarrie et al, 1979 |
11 | Temperature during larval development | The mean preferred temperature of pink salmon fry was 10.3°C [The youngest sea-run fry (newly emerged) generally selected temperatures of 11.7-12.8°C in a vertical gradient, whereas older fry (up to 10 wk) were found in temperatures of 9.4-10.6°C] | 12.25 °C | Kwain, 1982 |
13 | Full yolk-sac resorption | 305 [Swim-up from fertilization: 805 degree-days, less 500 for hatching ] | 305.0 °C * day | Bascinar and Okumus, 2004 |
13 | Full yolk-sac resorption | [Duration for 50% emergence: 66.1 days at 9.6°C, 36.6 days at 9.7°C, 64.1 days at 5.1°C and 153.4 days at 2.9°C, also 41.7 days at 10.5°C, 39.4 days at 7.3°C, 45.8 days at 6.0 and 46.7 days at 5.2°C] | 50.0 °C * day | Murray and Beacham, 1986 |
13 | Full yolk-sac resorption | Emergence at 255 DD [3°C], 330 DD[6°C], 310 DD [10°C] and 360 DD [12°C] deduced from graph and size at hatching average 31 mm, range 28.5 to 33.5 | 255.0 °C * day | Beacham and Murray, 1990 |
13 | Full yolk-sac resorption | 50% emergence vary: 32.3 days [14°C], 43.6 days [11°C], 48 days [8°C], 74.2 days [5°C]; Mean SL vary at 50% emergence vary with temperature: 26 [14°C], 27.1 [11°C], 28.4 [8°C], 26.8 [5°C] | 50.0 °C * day | Murray and McPhail, 1988 |
14 | Onset of exogeneous feeding | Alveins emerged from the gravel and started feeding 6 to 8 weeks after hatching at 11-12°C | 11.5 °C * day | Macquarrie et al, 1979 |
8 | Initial larval size | 30-45 | 37.5 mm | Scott and Crossman, 1998 |
8 | Initial larval size | 30 | 30.0 mm | Behnke, 2002 |
11 | Temperature during larval development | 12-14 | 13.0 °C | Scott and Crossman, 1998 |
Trait id | Trait | Primary Data | Secondary Data | References |
---|---|---|---|---|
15 | Age at sexual maturity | 2 | 2.0 year | Barton, 1996 |
15 | Age at sexual maturity | Virtually all mature at 2 [rarely 1-3] | 2.0 year | Beacham et al, 1988 |
16 | Length at sexual maturity | 61 | 61.0 cm | Barton, 1996 |
16 | Length at sexual maturity | 44.8-50.8 mean fork length between 1971-1979 [n= 4500] | 47.8 cm | Golobanov, 1982 |
16 | Length at sexual maturity | 40.3-54.5 [mean varies between 43.7-52.7] | 47.4 cm | Zolotukhin, 1993 |
16 | Length at sexual maturity | 39.3 ± 3 | 39.3 cm | Macquarrie et al, 1979 |
16 | Length at sexual maturity | Spawning runs in 1979 averaged 358 mm in fork length for both sexes, whereas from a pooled Lake Huron/Lake Michigan sample averaged 389 mm for both sexes | 1979.0 cm | Kwain, 1982 |
16 | Length at sexual maturity | Mean standard length: 47.58, range 43.0-54.9 | 48.95 cm | Keenleyside and Dupuis, 1988 |
17 | Weight at sexual maturity | 1.05-1.44 mean weight between 1971-1979 [n= 4500] | 1.25 kg | Golobanov, 1982 |
17 | Weight at sexual maturity | 0.600-2.350 is the mean [Varies between 0.830-1.960] | 1.48 kg | Zolotukhin, 1993 |
17 | Weight at sexual maturity | 706 ± 140 g ! | 706.0 kg | Macquarrie et al, 1979 |
17 | Weight at sexual maturity | Average weight was 0.68 kg | 0.68 kg | Kwain, 1982 |
18 | Female sexual dimorphism | Morphological changes are minor in mature females but they show the same color changes as males | Absent | Groot, 1996 |
19 | Relative fecundity | 0.472 | 0.47 thousand eggs/kg | Groot, 1996 |
19 | Relative fecundity | 0.875 in reared conditions] | 0.88 thousand eggs/kg | Macquarrie et al, 1979 |
20 | Absolute fecundity | 1.2-1.9 | 1.55 thousand eggs | Groot, 1996 |
20 | Absolute fecundity | 1.038-1.950 [n=232] | 1.49 thousand eggs | Kaev and Kaeva, 1986 |
20 | Absolute fecundity | 1.4-1.725 between 1971-1979 [n= 4500] | 1.56 thousand eggs | Golobanov, 1982 |
20 | Absolute fecundity | 0.633-2.661 [mean varies between 1.076-1.972] | 1.65 thousand eggs | Zolotukhin, 1993 |
20 | Absolute fecundity | 1.2-1.8 | 1.5 thousand eggs | Fishbase, 2006 |
20 | Absolute fecundity | 1.63-1.77 | 1.7 thousand eggs | Beacham and Murray, 1993 |
20 | Absolute fecundity | 0.652, lower than in the wild 0.8-2 | 1.4 thousand eggs | Macquarrie et al, 1979 |
20 | Absolute fecundity | Average number of eggs per female was 1060 ± 229, low compared to 1500-1900 in the sea-run fish | 1060.0 thousand eggs | Kwain, 1982 |
21 | Oocyte development | Synchronous ovarian organization, determinate fecundity | Synchronous | Fishbase, 2006 |
23 | Intensifying oogenesis activity | Final maturation and peak spawning occurs in September-October of the following year | ['September', 'October'] | Macquarrie et al, 1979 |
24 | Maximum GSI value | 17.44 ± 1.40 [Spawning grounds] | 17.44 percent | Dye et al, 1986 |
24 | Maximum GSI value | Mean of 16.8 (range 16.1-17.4%) for different populations | 16.75 percent | Fleming, 1998 |
Trait id | Trait | Primary Data | Secondary Data | References |
---|---|---|---|---|
27 | Age at sexual maturity | Virtually all mature at 2 [rarely 1-3] | 2.0 years | Beacham et al, 1988 |
27 | Age at sexual maturity | Generally marure at 2-3 years of age [Sex not specified] | 2.5 years | Bradbury et al, 1999 |
28 | Length at sexual maturity | 44.5-54.9 mean fork length between 1971-1979 [n= 4500] | 49.7 cm | Golobanov, 1982 |
28 | Length at sexual maturity | 38.5-62.5 [mean range from 45-52] | 50.5 cm | Zolotukhin, 1993 |
28 | Length at sexual maturity | 42.4 ± 3.8 | 42.4 cm | Macquarrie et al, 1979 |
28 | Length at sexual maturity | Spawning runs in 1979 averaged 358 mm in fork length for both sexes, whereas from a pooled Lake Huron/Lake Michigan sample averaged 389 mm for both sexes | 1979.0 cm | Kwain, 1982 |
28 | Length at sexual maturity | Mean standard length: 50.37, range 41.6-57.5 | 49.55 cm | Keenleyside and Dupuis, 1988 |
29 | Weight at sexual maturity | 1.01-1.85 mean weight between 1971-1979 [n= 4500] | 1.43 kg | Golobanov, 1982 |
29 | Weight at sexual maturity | 0.650-3.210 [mean range from 1.017-1.960] | 1.93 kg | Zolotukhin, 1993 |
29 | Weight at sexual maturity | 793 ± 174 g ! | 793.0 kg | Macquarrie et al, 1979 |
30 | Male sexual dimorphism | Marked hump and a large kype, colour changes | Absent | Groot, 1996 |
30 | Male sexual dimorphism | Males have larger heads, thicker caudal peduncles, longer bases of the anal and dorsal fin | Absent | Beacham et al, 1988 |
30 | Male sexual dimorphism | Male pink salmon normally develop a pronouced hump, but males adopting a satellite-male mating tactic have only a small hump [In Salmo, most Salvelinus, and most Oncorhynchus, a major sexual difference is found in the development , in normal breeding individuals, of elongated, hooked jaws with enlarged teeth.An upturned lower jaw is technically called a kype; an enlarged and often distorted upper jaw is termed a snout.Kype and sount development differs not only among individuals but also among species and conspecific populations: it is generally greater in stream-dwelling and anadromous forms than in lake-spawning or strickly freshwater forms.Kypes andsnouts are best developed in males, although females of some species also develop smaller ones. Another secondary trait is a hump anterior to dorsal fin, found especially in males.] | Present | Willson, 1997 |
30 | Male sexual dimorphism | At one extreme are the biggest males with greatly enlarged snout (Kype) and dorsal hump (hence the name "humpback" for this species). The kype with its large teeth is used to ram and bite other males; similar snout development and associated aggressive behaviour are found in other salmonids. The considerable dorsal hump development, however, is unique to pink salmon, and as the largest males are consitently closest to the female in the group of males associated with har at spawning, the greatly enlarged hump also contributes to dominance amon males. At the other extreme are the smallest males, who resemble females in size, shape, and colour. | Absent | Keenleyside and Dupuis, 1988 |
30 | Male sexual dimorphism | Males are bigger than females | Absent | Fleming, 1998 |
33 | Maximum GSI value | Mean of 5.2 (range 4.9-5.4%) for different populations | 5.15 percent | Fleming, 1998 |
35 | Resting period | 5.39 ± 0.5 [Spawning grounds] | 5.39 months | Dye et al, 1986 |
Trait id | Trait | Primary Data | Secondary Data | References |
---|---|---|---|---|
36 | Spawning migration distance | Spawning grounds can be as far as 700 km, but generally are within 100 km of the coast | 700.0 km | Groot, 1996 |
36 | Spawning migration distance | This stock of pink salmon takes approximatively 2 weeks to migrate the 333 km upstream to the spawning grounds | 333.0 km | Dye et al, 1986 |
36 | Spawning migration distance | Usually move only about 40 miles upstream but may move as much as 300 miles in large rivers, or may spawn in the lower tidal areas in other rivers | 40.0 km | Scott and Crossman, 1973 |
36 | Spawning migration distance | Upstream migration usually less than 0.5 miles but a migration of 40-50 miles has been reported on Lake Superiori tributary | 45.0 km | Goodyear et al, 1982 |
36 | Spawning migration distance | Although spawning generally takes place in freshwater close to the sea or in interdital zones, some pink salmon may sapwn in streams several kilometers upstream from slatwater | No data | Bradbury et al, 1999 |
37 | Spawning migration period | Pink salmon returned to spawn in their natal streams in southern British Columbia during September and October | ['September', 'October'] | Beacham and Murray, 1986 |
37 | Spawning migration period | Between June and September | ['June', 'September'] | Groot, 1996 |
37 | Spawning migration period | Spawners begin to move into the rivers at the beginning of July | ['July'] | Golobanov, 1982 |
37 | Spawning migration period | The entry of the spawners in the river was in July | ['July'] | Zolotukhin, 1993 |
37 | Spawning migration period | From June to September | ['June', 'July', 'August', 'September'] | Scott and Crossman, 1973 |
37 | Spawning migration period | June to late September, depending on location | ['June', 'September'] | Fishbase, 2006 |
37 | Spawning migration period | Congrate off tributary mouths beginning in mid-August; ascend tributaries grounds in September | ['August', 'September'] | Goodyear et al, 1982 |
37 | Spawning migration period | The prespawning run of O. gorbuscha in waters of the Pacific Ocean off the Kurils lasts from May to September. This water area is first crossed (late May-June) by the migrating early summer O. gorbuscha, then, (the end of June-July) follows the late summer O. gorbuscha, and from August to September, the run is terminated by the autumn O. gorbuscha. | ['May', 'June', 'July', 'August', 'September', 'October', 'November', 'December'] | Shubin et Kovalenko, 2000 |
38 | Homing | Natal streams | Present | Beacham and Murray, 1986 |
38 | Homing | Although some adult return to their natal streams to spawn, the rate of straying amon pink salmon is believed to be much higher than in any other species of salmon | Present | Bradbury et al, 1999 |
39 | Spawning season | Late August to early October | ['August', 'October'] | Groot, 1996 |
39 | Spawning season | Salmon spawning does not extend past October | ['October'] | Beacham and Murray, 1986 |
39 | Spawning season | In British Columbia, pink salmon spawn during August through October | ['August', 'October'] | Beacham et al, 1988 |
39 | Spawning season | Mainly in August, with a peak in early-mid August [in the rivers of nothern shore of the sea of Okhotsk] | ['August'] | Golobanov, 1982 |
39 | Spawning season | Early August until the ten first days of September | ['August', 'September'] | Zolotukhin, 1993 |
39 | Spawning season | From mid-July to late October | ['July', 'October'] | Scott and Crossman, 1973 |
39 | Spawning season | September-November [June-November] | ['June', 'September', 'October', 'November'] | Fishbase, 2006 |
39 | Spawning season | September-early October, usually peaks in mid-September | ['September', 'October'] | Goodyear et al, 1982 |
39 | Spawning season | Occurs in late August through October | ['August', 'October'] | Bradbury et al, 1999 |
39 | Spawning season | Among the species of Oncorhynchus, the salmon are typically late-summer spawners (the exact timing differing among locations and years), although southern chinook populations breed in psring, and some coho populations breed in late winter | ['January', 'February', 'March', 'July', 'August', 'September'] | Willson, 1997 |
39 | Spawning season | Pacific salmon spawn in fall (though this may be as early as July or as late as February, depending on species and region) whereas the Pacific trout species (formely in the genus Salmo) spawn in spring. | ['February', 'April', 'May', 'June', 'July', 'October', 'November', 'December'] | Quinn and Myers, 2004 |
39 | Spawning season | October-November | ['October', 'November'] | Keenleyside and Dupuis, 1988 |
40 | Spawning period duration | 6-8 [that long when spawning ground availibility is limited] | 7.0 weeks | Groot, 1996 |
40 | Spawning period duration | Spawning time of female from selection of first nest site to death averages 10.8 days | 10.8 weeks | Groot, 1996 |
40 | Spawning period duration | 5-6 | 5.5 weeks | Zolotukhin, 1993 |
40 | Spawning period duration | A period of 3-5 days | 4.0 weeks | Goodyear et al, 1982 |
41 | Spawning temperature | Most spawning at 10-12°C [Range 7-19°C] | 11.0 °C | Groot, 1996 |
41 | Spawning temperature | The five stocks studied spawned when surface water temperature was near 8°C | 8.0 °C | Beacham and Murray, 1986 |
41 | Spawning temperature | 8-14 | 11.0 °C | Golobanov, 1982 |
41 | Spawning temperature | As high as 16, but spawning lof later runs peak at 10 | 16.0 °C | Scott and Crossman, 1973 |
41 | Spawning temperature | At 60°F, i.e., 15.5°C | 60.0 °C | Goodyear et al, 1982 |
41 | Spawning temperature | 6-12°C during the study | 9.0 °C | Keenleyside and Dupuis, 1988 |
42 | Spawning water type | Velocities 30 to 140 cm/sec | Flowing or turbulent water | Groot, 1996 |
42 | Spawning water type | Primarily in streams with riffles, but also brackish water conditions in river mouths | No category | Groot, 1996 |
42 | Spawning water type | Channel part of the river [Velocity of flow is about 0.2-1.1 m/s] | Flowing or turbulent water | Golobanov, 1982 |
42 | Spawning water type | Rivers and tributary streams, with current | Flowing or turbulent water | Scott and Crossman, 1973 |
42 | Spawning water type | Usually in brush-choked streams in shoal area nearest stream mouth where there is a suitable substrate and water velocity of 0.75-3.25 | Flowing or turbulent water | Goodyear et al, 1982 |
42 | Spawning water type | Streams, intertidal | No category | Willson, 1997 |
43 | Spawning depth | Usually 30 to 100 cm in depth [In dry years, spawning can occur at 10-15 cm] | 12.5 m | Groot, 1996 |
43 | Spawning depth | Spawn at depths of 0.5 and 2.0 m, but in the greater part of the spawning grounds depths of 0.7 to 1.0 predominate | 2.0 m | Golobanov, 1982 |
43 | Spawning depth | About 30.5-61 cm | 45.75 m | Scott and Crossman, 1973 |
43 | Spawning depth | 6 inches - 2 feet | 6.0 m | Goodyear et al, 1982 |
43 | Spawning depth | 0.2-0.5 m | 0.35 m | Bradbury et al, 1999 |
44 | Spawning substrate | Gravels | Lithophils | Groot, 1996 |
44 | Spawning substrate | Lithophils | Lithophils | Balon, 1975 |
44 | Spawning substrate | Eggs are dpeosited in redd dug in medium-sized gravel | Lithophils | Goodyear et al, 1982 |
44 | Spawning substrate | Mainly oversand/gravel/cobble substrate | Lithophils | Bradbury et al, 1999 |
45 | Spawning site preparation | Starts defending nesting territories as soon as they have moved on breeding grounds | No category | Groot, 1996 |
45 | Spawning site preparation | Female seach and dig a nest | Susbtrate chooser | Groot, 1996 |
45 | Spawning site preparation | It is the female that prepares the nest or rFemaledd [The males are aggessive to other males (female are to females also, but to a lesser extend)] | No category | Scott and Crossman, 1973 |
45 | Spawning site preparation | The female buids the redd by lying on one side and using its tail, it deplace silt and light gravel to produce a deep trough | Susbtrate chooser | Fishbase, 2006 |
45 | Spawning site preparation | Brood hiders | Susbtrate chooser | Balon, 1975 |
45 | Spawning site preparation | Upon establishing a territory, the female constructs, spawns in, and covers a series of nests (three to eight), and then defends these from other females until her death days to weeks later | No category | Hamon et al, 1999 |
45 | Spawning site preparation | The female digs a redd | Susbtrate chooser | Kwain, 1982 |
45 | Spawning site preparation | Nest by female | Best build by female | Fleming, 1998 |
46 | Nycthemeral period of oviposition | Occur mainly at dusk and during darkness | Dusk | Groot, 1996 |
47 | Mating system | Many courting pairs are attended by a number of satellite males (up to ten), which join the pair in the nest when the eggs are finally shed | No category | Groot, 1996 |
47 | Mating system | Several males may spawn with a single female in one nest, individual females my build more than one nest, and a single male may spawn with more than one female | No category | Scott and Crossman, 1973 |
47 | Mating system | In some cases, several males spawn with a single female | No category | Fishbase, 2006 |
47 | Mating system | Female is attented by several males | No category | Kwain, 1982 |
47 | Mating system | Most effective spawning takes place with a predominance of males (up to 3 males per female) or with equal sex ratio coupled with low density of spawners | No category | Chebanov, 1986 |
47 | Mating system | Ten or more males may jockey for position near a nest-digging female and dash together into the nest when she spawns. The number of males competing for access to a single female is typically greater than in other salmonids. | No category | Keenleyside and Dupuis, 1988 |
48 | Spawning release | Once a year | Total | Groot, 1996 |
48 | Spawning release | An average of two (one to four) egg batches per nest containing about 500 eggs [Average depth at which eggs are buried is 20-30 cm] | Multiple | Groot, 1996 |
48 | Spawning release | Deposition of all eggs can occur between 1-8 days | No category | Groot, 1996 |
49 | Parity | Semelparous : died soon after the end of the spawning season | Semelparous | Groot, 1996 |
49 | Parity | Survivorship rates are low, at 1-25% | Semelparous | Fishbase, 2006 |
49 | Parity | Die soon after spawning | Semelparous | Goodyear et al, 1982 |
49 | Parity | Oncorhynchus species are principally semelparous, | Semelparous | Willson, 1997 |
49 | Parity | All members of the genus Oncorhynchus(including anadromous and non-anadromous forms) die after spawning, and this is true with three exceptions. Firstn the Pacific trout species, are all iteroparous. Second, male masu salmon (O. masou) that mature in fresh water as parr are capable of surviving, migrating to sea, and spawning in subsequent season, though anadromous males and females are semelparous. Third, under experimental conditions male chinhook salmon can mature as parr, survive spawning, grow, and spawn again the following year, and even a third year. | Iteroparous | Quinn and Myers, 2004 |
49 | Parity | Pink salmon have a rigid 2-year life cycle | No category | Murray and Beacham, 1986 |
49 | Parity | Pink salmon have the shortest and most inflexible life cycle of all the Pacific salmon | No category | Macquarrie et al, 1979 |
49 | Parity | 0% of repeat spawners | No category | Fleming, 1998 |
50 | Parental care | Nest construction and defence of territories appear to continue day and night | No category | Groot, 1996 |
50 | Parental care | The female usually guards the nest as long as she is able but the spawning adults die in a few days or weeks | No category | Scott and Crossman, 1973 |
50 | Parental care | Non guarders | No care | Fishbase, 2006 |
50 | Parental care | Postspawning females of Pacific salmon also commonly guard their nests for several days (up to 3 weeks by coho) before they die. | Female parental care | Willson, 1997 |
50 | Parental care | The female defends the nests from other females until her death days to weeks later. Male pacific salmon take no part in parental care. Rather they remain sexually active throughout their breeding life span and move amongst breeding females | Male parental care | Hamon et al, 1999 |
50 | Parental care | Nesting defence by females after | No category | Fleming, 1998 |