| Anguilla anguilla |
Maximum GSI obtained in different studies: 12.6 only, 40 in other previous experiment and 60.7. |
12.6 percent |
Boetius and Boetius, 1980 |
| Anguilla anguilla |
Reach 43.8-57.9 before spawning |
50.85 percent |
Bezdenezhinykh and Petukhov, 1982 |
| Anguilla anguilla |
About 50% in artificial conditions |
50.0 percent |
Vollestad and Jonsson, 1986 |
| Anguilla anguilla |
Up to 32 to 60% in artificial conditions ! |
32.0 percent |
Bruslé and Quignard, 2001 |
| Anguilla anguilla |
31.8 in artificial conditions |
31.8 percent |
Pedersen, 2003 |
| Anguilla anguilla |
GSI of 44.8 ± 6.5 (range 36.3-60.0) in artificial conditions |
44.8 percent |
Palstra, 2005 |
| Anguilla anguilla |
GSI of 68.4% |
68.4 percent |
Amin, 1998 |
| Anguilla anguilla |
GSI equalled from 35.1 to 42.3 |
35.1 percent |
Epler, 1981 |
| Alosa alosa |
16-27% [Not precised] |
21.5 percent |
Bruslé and Quignard, 2001 |
| Alosa alosa |
Max 21.63 |
21.63 percent |
Maitland and Lyle, 2005 |
| Alosa alosa |
Calculated based on Table 1. Around 18-20% in April-May |
19.0 percent |
Collares-Pereira, 1999 |
| Alosa fallax |
23.31 |
23.31 percent |
Maitland and Lyle, 2005 |
| Alosa fallax |
18.8 ± 7.5% |
18.8 percent |
Doherty, 2004 |
| Alosa fallax |
Mean of 8.30 ± 0.83 [Between May and July] |
8.3 percent |
Lopez, 2007 |
| Alosa sapidissima |
Mean 20.5, up to 35.4 |
20.5 percent |
Olney, 2001 |
| Alosa sapidissima |
14-19 [Calculated from values given by the authors] |
16.5 percent |
Olney and McBride, 2003 |
| Aphanius iberus |
Mean of 14 [Up to 17.5] in July |
14.0 percent |
Vargas and De Sostoa, 1997 |
| Aphanius iberus |
Two maxima: one in April [mean of 13, up to 14.5] and a second in August-September [mean of 3, up to 4]. Each maximum represented females of different ages |
13.0 percent |
Fernandez-Delgado, 1988 |
| Valencia hispanica |
A mean of 12% [Up to 14%] in April |
12.0 percent |
Caiola, 2001 |
| Barbatula barbatula |
30-32 [Before spawning in May] |
31.0 percent |
Skryabin, 1993 |
| Barbatula barbatula |
7.5-23.9 [November-December] and 16.3-24.6 [May] |
15.7 percent |
Saat, 2003 |
| Barbatula barbatula |
From March to June, with a few small fish excepted, GSI lies on or above 10%, in a few instances reaching the high figures of 35%. From July to August, the ratio ranges between 3 and 20%, the higher values being largely late-spawners or non-spawners |
10.0 percent |
Smyly, 1955 |
| Cobitis taenia |
Mean of 0.28, range 0.24-0.30 [Mid June but for GSR, which is the gonad weight/total weight minus gonad weight] |
0.27 percent |
Marconato and Rasotto, 1989 |
| Cobitis taenia |
13-24 [Late June and early July, GSI depending on the fish length] |
18.5 percent |
Vaino and Saat, 2003 |
| Cobitis paludica |
11.46 [April-June] |
11.46 percent |
Oliva-Paterna, 2002 |
| Blicca bjoerkna |
14.5 [Mid-June, prior to spawning] |
14.5 percent |
Rinchard and Kestemont, 1996 |
| Blicca bjoerkna |
Mean of 8, but up to 12% [Mid-May] |
8.0 percent |
Hansen, 1980 |
| Blicca bjoerkna |
7.07 ± 1.00 [In April] |
7.07 percent |
Lefler, 2006 |
| Blicca bjoerkna |
Ovary weight gradually increases during the spring months and peaks at the beginning of May (15.56%) |
15.56 percent |
Lefler, 2008 |
| Abramis brama |
Mean of 16.8-21 [Up to 23.8] |
18.9 percent |
Backiel and Zawiska, 1968 |
| Abramis brama |
Up to 23.3 [Calculated without viscera] |
23.3 percent |
Sokolova, 1990 |
| Abramis brama |
GSI observed in different areas: 16.3 [Drukshya], 33-43 [Kama], 8.3-18.5 [Volga], 5.5-28.4 [Goczalkowice] |
38.0 percent |
Brylinska and Boron, 2004 |
| Abramis brama |
The lowest and highest mean coefficients in males were 2.141 (June 1976, Lake Dabie) and 24.532 (late May, 1976, Regalicia) |
2.141 percent |
Kompowski, 1982 |
| Abramis brama |
In spring, the ovaries accouned for 0.2-24.7% of the total body weight |
12.45 percent |
Neja and Kompowski, 2001 |
| Alburnoides bipunctatus |
20.5 ± 0.9 [n=24] in May, 25 |
20.5 percent |
Yildirim, 1999 |
| Alburnoides bipunctatus |
GSI ranged from 1.6 to 36.4 |
1.6 percent |
Polacik and Kovac, 2006 |
| Alburnus alburnus |
17.1 (June, prior to spawning) |
17.1 percent |
Rinchard and Kestemont, 1996 |
| Aristichthys nobilis |
17-20% |
18.5 percent |
Jennigs, 1988 |
| Aristichthys nobilis |
Average maturity rate 13.6% |
13.6 percent |
Naca, 1989 |
| Aristichthys nobilis |
Max=14.7 [Up to 20% in China] in May |
14.7 percent |
Schrank and Guy, 2002 |
| Aristichthys nobilis |
In Fish from Moldova ponds maturation indexes comprised only 6-9%, on other coolers of Ukraine 10-12%. By our observations in ponds in Turmenistan and Uzbekistan this index comprises 11-13% |
7.5 percent |
Makeyeva, 1996 |
| Aspius aspius |
The highest average values of this index among females 12.07 occurred at the end of March. This is also when the maximum individual value of this index was observed 20.73 (range 0.22-20.73) |
10.475 percent |
Kompowski et Neja, 2004 |
| Aspius aspius |
8.6-15.3 (mean 11.6) |
11.95 percent |
Shikhshabekov, 1979 |
| Barbus barbus |
About 11%, up to 12 [In beginning of June] |
11.0 percent |
Lobon-Cervia and Fernandez-Delgado, 1984 |
| Barbus barbus |
6.15 ± 2.14 [In April] |
6.15 percent |
Lefler, 2006 |
| Barbus barbus |
GSI reaches its maximim value at the beginning of May (11.00%) |
11.0 percent |
Lefler, 2008 |
| Carassius auratus |
18.7 ± 0.8 (April 30) |
18.7 percent |
Kagawa, 1983 |
| Carassius auratus |
10.5 ± 1.2 (May) |
10.5 percent |
Kobayashi, 1986 |
| Carassius auratus |
30 |
30.0 percent |
Bruslé and Quignard, 2001 |
| Carassius carassius |
About 20% |
20.0 percent |
Bruslé and Quignard, 2001 |
| Carassius carassius |
GSI range from an average of 5.51 ± 1.36 (range 3.92-7.91), to 8.59 ± 1.80 (range 5.60-11.8), and 11.56 ± 5.78 (range 3.63-20.98) in three fifferent regions in May |
5.51 percent |
Aho and Holopainen, 2000 |
| Carassius carassius |
Total mass of eggs related to body mass ranged from 11.7-20.3%, which is much higher than the data of other authors (0.9-12.8%) |
16.0 percent |
Sczerbowski and Szczerbowski, 1996 |
| Chondrostoma nasus |
20.15 ± 3.12 [In April] |
20.15 percent |
Lefler, 2006 |
| Chondrostoma nasus |
GSI = 20.63% in April 11 (n = 12) |
20.63 percent |
Lefler, 2008 |
| Ctenopharyngodon idella |
18.4-21.6 % Prior to ovulation |
20.0 percent |
Khan, 2004 |
| Ctenopharyngodon idella |
20% |
20.0 percent |
Shireman and Smith, 1983 |
| Ctenopharyngodon idella |
Average maturity rate of 14.2% |
14.2 percent |
Naca, 1989 |
| Cyprinus carpio |
20-30 |
25.0 percent |
Bruslé and Quignard, 2001 |
| Cyprinus carpio |
About 10% |
10.0 percent |
Yaron and Levavi-Zermonsky, 1986 |
| Cyprinus carpio |
Mean of 28%, up to 30% [June] |
28.0 percent |
Crivelli, 1981 |
| Cyprinus carpio |
Maximum GSI values in female 17%, less than in other studies 29% |
17.0 percent |
Dubost, 1997 |
| Cyprinus carpio |
Mean of 18% up to 21-22% [In October in Australia] |
21.5 percent |
Smith and Walker, 2004 |
| Cyprinus carpio |
About 25% [May] |
25.0 percent |
June, 1977 |
| Cyprinus carpio |
Recorded estimates are usually around 20% for males |
20.0 percent |
Smith, 2004 |
| Gobio gobio |
16.53 ± 1.53 [Idem as Spawning value, May-June] |
16.53 percent |
Rinchard, 1993 |
| Gobio gobio |
23-28.6 |
25.8 percent |
Bruslé and Quignard, 2001 |
| Gobio gobio |
16.5% [June, and July] |
16.5 percent |
Kestemont, 1987 |
| Gobio gobio |
17.1 [April, May] |
17.1 percent |
Rosecchi, 2001 |
| Gobio gobio |
Huge variations between females, from 4 to 22, most between 12-18% in May |
15.0 percent |
Mann, 1980 |
| Gobio gobio |
13.5 [End of May in the control group] |
13.5 percent |
Kestemont, 1990 |
| Hypophthalmichthys molitrix |
18-20% [Not specified when] |
19.0 percent |
Makeeva, 1988 |
| Hypophthalmichthys molitrix |
Average maturity rate 15.1% |
15.1 percent |
Naca, 1989 |
| Leucaspius delineatus |
Mean about 13%, up to 16% [In May] |
13.0 percent |
Cassou and Le Louarn, 1991 |
| Leuciscus cephalus |
13.56 [May] |
13.56 percent |
Kalkan, 2005 |
| Leuciscus cephalus |
Up to 15-18% [June] |
16.5 percent |
Unlu and Balci, 1993 |
| Leuciscus cephalus |
7.37% [In March] |
7.37 percent |
Sasi, 2003 |
| Leuciscus cephalus |
9-10% [In Mid-May] |
9.5 percent |
Mann, 1976 |
| Leuciscus cephalus |
12, range 11-14 [In June] |
12.5 percent |
Poncin, 1989 |
| Leuciscus cephalus |
The maximum values for females in May was calculated to be 9.1 |
9.1 percent |
Unver, 1998 |
| Leuciscus cephalus |
Just before spawning ovaries may contribute to 1% body mass. Other authors said that at the brginning of spawning ovarian mass depends on female body size and contributes to 7.3-19.6% |
13.45 percent |
Zelepien, 1997 |
| Leuciscus cephalus |
Around 10% based on graph in May |
10.0 percent |
Erdogan, 2002 |
| Leuciscus idus |
GSI of mature females just before spawning (March-April) ranges from 7 to 20%, typically about 12%. In Scandinavian populations GSI value are higher, from 17 to 30% (mean 21%) |
7.0 percent |
Witkowski, 1997 |
| Leuciscus idus |
19.14 ± 2.24 [In April] |
19.14 percent |
Lefler, 2006 |
| Leuciscus idus |
GSI =18.57 % in March 29 (n=5) |
18.57 percent |
Lefler, 2008 |
| Leuciscus leuciscus |
The average GSI for females about to spawn was 13.8% [Range 8.9-19.4%] |
14.15 percent |
Lobon-cervia, 1996 |
| Leuciscus leuciscus |
Mean of 16%, range 15-17% [Mid-March] |
16.0 percent |
Mann, 1974 |
| Mylopharyngodon piceus |
Average 11.00 |
11.0 percent |
Naca, 1989 |
| Phoxinus phoxinus |
Mean 20 [early June], but up to 25% |
20.0 percent |
Mills, 1987 |
| Phoxinus phoxinus |
20 |
20.0 percent |
Wooton and Mills, 1979 |
| Phoxinus phoxinus |
Mean 14, up to 16 [May] |
14.0 percent |
Scott, 1979 |
| Phoxinus phoxinus |
14.2-25.5, mean 18.2 [Not specified when] |
19.85 percent |
Heese, 1984 |
| Phoxinus phoxinus |
Range between 12-14 during May-June |
13.0 percent |
Mills and Eloranta, 1985 |
| Phoxinus phoxinus |
Maximum GSI vary between 4 locations, about 8-9% in Mid-May [Papulampi, eastern forest Lapland], about 6-7% in Mid-June [Lapland], 13-14 in Mid-May [Central Finland] and 21-22 in Mid-June [Southern england] |
8.5 percent |
Mills, 1988 |
| Pimephales promelas |
Mean GSI of 9.71 ± 0.5, up to 12 |
9.71 percent |
Jensen, 2001 |
| Pseudorasbora parva |
27 |
27.0 percent |
Bruslé and Quignard, 2001 |
| Pseudorasbora parva |
Up to 30% [June, prior to spawning] |
30.0 percent |
Makeyeva and Mokamed, 1982 |
| Pseudorasbora parva |
Up to 27% |
27.0 percent |
Billard, 1997 |
| Pseudorasbora parva |
27.9 [May] |
27.9 percent |
Rosecchi, 2001 |
| Rhodeus sericeus |
7-10 |
8.5 percent |
Bruslé and Quignard, 2001 |
| Rutilus rutilus |
21 [Mid-May, prior to spawning] |
21.0 percent |
Rinchard and Kestemont, 1996 |
| Rutilus rutilus |
21 [Not precised] |
21.0 percent |
Bruslé and Quignard, 2001 |
| Rutilus rutilus |
14-16 [Just prior spawning in May] |
15.0 percent |
Mann, 1973 |
| Rutilus rutilus |
Between 9.03 up to 16.67 increase with the age of female [7.35 for the smallest mature female] |
9.03 percent |
Papageorgiou, 1979 |
| Rutilus rutilus |
About 11% in 2001 and 15% in 2002 [End of April] |
11.0 percent |
Tarkan, 2006 |
| Rutilus rutilus |
|
No data |
Libovarsky, 1985 |
| Rutilus rutilus |
Mean 18%, up to 30% [In April, in Gomishan] and Mean of 15% up to 23% [In April for Anzali] |
18.0 percent |
Naddafi, 2005 |
| Rutilus rutilus |
Peak at the end of May at 20-23% |
21.5 percent |
Gillet and Quétin, 2006 |
| Scardinius erythrophthalmus |
Average 9.3 |
9.3 percent |
Shikhshabekov, 1979 |
| Scardinius erythrophthalmus |
About 12.5 in 2001 and 14.5% in 2002 [May] |
12.5 percent |
Tarkan, 2006 |
| Tinca tinca |
7.95 ± 1.12 [July during spawning season] |
7.95 percent |
Pinillos, 2003 |
| Tinca tinca |
8.3-10.5 [End of May] |
9.4 percent |
Breton, 1980 |
| Tinca tinca |
17% [In June] |
17.0 percent |
Yilmaz, 2002 |
| Tinca tinca |
Most 7-10, but up to 17% [June] |
8.5 percent |
Linhart and Billard, 1995 |
| Tinca tinca |
Mean of 10.19 ± 0.66 [In June] |
10.19 percent |
Alas and Solak, 2004 |
| Tinca tinca |
Around 17% (based on graph) |
17.0 percent |
Kubu and Kouril, 1985 |
| Vimba vimba |
Mean 14.2%, but up to 18.0 [3 June] |
14.2 percent |
Hliwa, 2002 |
| Vimba vimba |
The average weight of the gonads calculated from 10 specimens of V. vimba obtained in 1972, of body weight 550-750 g g., constitued about 13 to over 24 per cent of the body weight of the fish, the mean being 17.3 per cent |
17.3 percent |
Wajdowicz, 1974 |
| Vimba vimba |
The mean GSI in eight examined females amounted to 13.9% (12.1-17.3%) |
14.7 percent |
Lusk, 2005 |
| Gambusia affinis |
23-24.1 [From late June to early October] |
23.55 percent |
Koya, 1998 |
| Gambusia affinis |
20-22%, every 22 days during the reproductive season |
21.0 percent |
Koya, 2000 |
| Esox lucius |
Almost 20% [Prior to spawning] |
20.0 percent |
Billard, 1996 |
| Esox lucius |
About 22% |
22.0 percent |
Lenhardt, 1992 |
| Esox lucius |
Range between 15 and 25% in February |
15.0 percent |
Goedmakers and Verboom, 1974 |
| Esox lucius |
Mean 8.98, range 3.81-11.28 [In L. Kinord], 8.32, range 7.42-8.92 [L. Davan], 4.0-8.7 [L. Skene], 15-20 [Windermere], 17 [Slapton Ley] |
7.545 percent |
Treasurer, 1990 |
| Esox lucius |
About 8% [In April] |
8.0 percent |
June, 1977 |
| Lota lota |
8.8 (November 26) but also up to 16.9% |
8.8 percent |
Brylinska, 2002 |
| Lota lota |
Mean of 12, from 10-14.8 in December [Coefficient of sexual maturation] |
12.4 percent |
Vedeneev, 2003 |
| Lota lota |
10-11 [In beginning of January] |
10.5 percent |
June, 1977 |
| Gasterosteus aculeatus |
Up to 45 % |
45.0 percent |
Bruslé and Quignard, 2001 |
| Gasterosteus aculeatus |
Mean 35, range 32-44 in June [With eviscerated weight !!, about 25-30%] |
38.0 percent |
Copp, 2002 |
| Gasterosteus aculeatus |
Peak in May: Mean of 19%, up to 21 in 1974 and mean of 12.5, up to 15.5 in 1975 |
19.0 percent |
Wootton, 1978 |
| Gasterosteus aculeatus |
Mean of 22, up to 25% [In June] |
22.0 percent |
Borg and Van Veen, 1982 |
| Gasterosteus aculeatus |
Mean of 19, 18-21, based on fig 5b |
19.5 percent |
Sokolowska and Sokolowska, 2006 |
| Pungitius pungitius |
About 35 in end of March [With eviscerated weight, i.e. about 25%] |
35.0 percent |
Copp, 2002 |
| Pungitius pungitius |
In females, the ovaries wan make up as much as 20% of the total weight during the reproductive period |
20.0 percent |
Sokolowska and Skora, 2002 |
| Lepomis gibbosus |
Up to 10.5, between 5.4-9.0, rarely peaking at 15 in Europe |
7.2 percent |
Copp, 2002 |
| Lepomis gibbosus |
Up to 15.2-15.3% |
15.25 percent |
Fox and Crivelli, 1998 |
| Lepomis gibbosus |
Mean of 7, up to 9.5% [In July] |
7.0 percent |
Burns, 1976 |
| Lepomis gibbosus |
Female mean IG: 5.6% [Ontario Lakes, Canada], 6.1%[Cottesmore Pond, England], 6.3% [Rhône River, Delta canals, France], 7.8% [Mirgenbach Reservoir, Moselle, France] |
5.6 percent |
Dembski, 2006 |
| Lepomis gibbosus |
GSI at peak months of spawning in various studies: 6.1% [England, Cottesmore pond], 9.0 [Romania, Danube Delta], 6.5 [Spain, Banyoles Lake], 6.4 [Brazil, Custodio's Dam], 9.3 [Canada, Warrens Lake], 6.9% [Canada, Black lake] |
6.1 percent |
De Magalhaes and Ratton, 2005 |
| Micropterus salmoides |
7-10% (unknown sources) |
8.5 percent |
Heidinger, 1976 |
| Micropterus salmoides |
4.57 for 15 forage-fed females (March), 6.97 ± 0.52 for 20 pelled-fed female (April and early May) |
6.97 percent |
Rosenblum, 1994 |
| Micropterus salmoides |
About 12 (March) |
12.0 percent |
Rosenblum, 1999 |
| Micropterus salmoides |
About 8 [April-May] |
8.0 percent |
Bruslé and Quignard, 2001 |
| Micropterus salmoides |
8% [May] |
8.0 percent |
Kokkidis, 2000 |
| Micropterus salmoides |
Maximal GSI observed for females were 8.2 (unheated) and 8.8 (heated) in March |
8.2 percent |
Bennett and Gibbons, 1975 |
| Micropterus salmoides |
For Low Altitude sample, GSI reach 7.34% [In May] and for high altitude sample, 10.08, up to 11.23% [Early July] |
7.34 percent |
Martin, 1997 |
| Micropterus salmoides |
Gonadosomatic index were highest between July and October for female fish:, peak in beginning of August about 4, range from 2 to 7 based on Fig 5 (n=145) |
4.0 percent |
Beamish, 2005 |
| Dicentrarchus labrax |
About 7.5 [In April, at Arcachon] |
7.5 percent |
Zohar, 1984 |
| Dicentrarchus labrax |
About 7.5, in March [In Arcachon, France], 8% in January[In Sète, France], 7.5 in December [Tunisia] |
7.5 percent |
Barnabé, 1980 |
| Morone americana |
7,67 ± 0,36 [April] |
67.0 percent |
Jackson and Sullivan, 1995 |
| Morone chrysops |
Mean 15, and up to 20% [Third week in May] |
15.0 percent |
Ruelle, 1977 |
| Morone chrysops |
16-17% [End of May] |
16.5 percent |
June, 1977 |
| Morone saxatilis |
Vary according to the age of female from: 10.77 ±3.28 [Age 3], 12.10 ± 4.65 [Age 4], 13.58 ± 4.30 [Age 5], 18.19 ± 4.09 [Age 6] in May |
10.77 percent |
Olsen and Rulifson, 1992 |
| Morone saxatilis |
Mean of 4% in April, for maturing captive females |
4.0 percent |
Holland, 2000 |
| Gymnocephalus cernuus |
7.1-15.6 [Average spawning GSI] |
11.35 percent |
Ogle, 1998 |
| Gymnocephalus cernuus |
9-11 [May] |
10.0 percent |
Brown, 1998 |
| Gymnocephalus cernuus |
8-11 [April] |
9.5 percent |
Leino and McCormick, 1997 |
| Gymnocephalus cernuus |
Gonad in stage VI, meaN: 13.81, range 9.52-24.29 [In other study, the coefficient in females migrating to spawn to average 15.6 (9.0-22.0)] |
16.905 percent |
Neja, 1988 |
| Perca flavescens |
21.6-22.6 |
22.1 percent |
Hayes and Taylor, 1994 |
| Perca flavescens |
22 in wild populations and up to 30.9% in cultured perch |
22.0 percent |
Dabrowski, 1996 |
| Perca flavescens |
From 20 to 31% [Just prior to spawning] |
20.0 percent |
Heidinger and Kayes, 1986 |
| Perca flavescens |
Mean 18.74% [March] |
18.74 percent |
Malservisi and Magnin, 1968 |
| Perca flavescens |
The fecundity index gradually increased smoothly for all age classes from April to May reaching a value of 20-25% immediatly before spawning |
22.5 percent |
Brazo, 1975 |
| Perca flavescens |
Mean 14, range 12-14 [March, but note that authors suspect that the Gsi's of yellow perch collected near to spawning (April-May) would have been higher] |
13.0 percent |
Tansichuk and Mackay, 1989 |
| Perca flavescens |
18% [April] |
18.0 percent |
June, 1977 |
| Perca flavescens |
For stunted individuals: GSI vary between 22.5 to 30% and for normal females from 12.5-22.5% |
17.5 percent |
Jansen,1996 |
| Perca fluviatilis |
25 % [April prior to spawning] |
25.0 percent |
Sulistyo,1998 |
| Perca fluviatilis |
21.3-24.3 |
22.8 percent |
Bruslé and Quignard, 2001 |
| Perca fluviatilis |
21.3-24.3% [Immediatly prior to spawning] |
22.8 percent |
Treasurer and Holliday, 1981 |
| Perca fluviatilis |
About 20% [Prior to spawning, in May] |
20.0 percent |
Le Cren, 1951 |
| Perca fluviatilis |
May, 18 +/- 0.6% just before spawning. |
18.0 percent |
Noaksson, 2004 |
| Sander lucioperca |
Can reach 22 for rearing individuals, but only 7 when conditions are bad |
22.0 percent |
Schlumberger and Proteau, 1991 |
| Sander lucioperca |
Can reach 22 [Before spawning] |
22.0 percent |
Lappaleinen, 2003 |
| Sander lucioperca |
Mean of 9, but up to 21.6 [March] |
9.0 percent |
Poulet, 2004 |
| Sander vitreus |
16.3 [May, prior to spawning] |
16.3 percent |
Craig, 2000 |
| Sander vitreus |
24.1-27.8 in certain areas |
25.95 percent |
Colby, 1979 |
| Sander vitreus |
About 16-17 [April] |
16.5 percent |
Malison, 1994 |
| Sander vitreus |
Mean of 16, can reach 20-22 [April] |
21.0 percent |
Henderson, 1996 |
| Sander vitreus |
About 20% [End of March] |
20.0 percent |
June, 1977 |
| Sander vitreus |
Summary statistics for mature adult walleye: mean GSI = 10.99 ± 0.34 [Trout Lake], 25.52 ± 0.42 [Winefred Lake], 13.46 ± 0.30 [Lake Winnipeg], 16.47 ± 0.44 [Lake of the woods], 18.57 ± 0.57 [Lac Beauchêne], 17.40 ± 0.34 [Lake Nipissing], 28.59 ± 1.05 [Lake Ontario] |
10.99 percent |
Moles, 2008 |
| Coregonus lavaretus |
15.77 [Not specified when] |
15.77 percent |
Mack and Billard, 1984 |
| Coregonus lavaretus |
Mean of 16%, up to 21% [In December] |
16.0 percent |
Fuller, 1976 |
| Coregonus lavaretus |
Up to 29-30% [End of November] |
29.5 percent |
Heese, 1990 |
| Coregonus albula |
Mean is 23.39 ± 4.21 [November] |
23.39 percent |
Demska-Zakes and Dlugosz, 1995 |
| Coregonus albula |
14.63-23.16% in Polish lakes [Up to 33.2%] |
18.895 percent |
Czerniejewski and Filipiak, 2002 |
| Coregonus albula |
19-27 [Autumn spawner] to 15-20 [Winter spawner] |
23.0 percent |
Lahti, 1991 |
| Coregonus albula |
26.5 [15 December], up to 29.92 [23 November] |
26.5 percent |
Dlugosz and Worniallo, 1985 |
| Coregonus albula |
Mean of 19.6, range 13.6-25.0 [In December for nominate form] and mean of 10.9, range 9.3-13.9 [In April/May, for deepwater form] |
19.3 percent |
Anwand, 1998 |
| Coregonus albula |
Gonadosomatic index for 1+ vendace females vary between years from 19 to 29% |
1.0 percent |
Sarval and Helminen, 1995 |
| Coregonus albula |
Means of GSI very between 24.1-29.5 between years |
26.8 percent |
Sarvala, 1992 |
| Coregonus albula |
For example in vendace females occurring in brackish waters of the Gulf of Bothnia it fits 10-12%, whereas in neighbouring lakes Keitele and Pyhajarvi it is 23.9% and 19.3%, respectively. In Polish bodies of water the values of GSI are also very variable. In Lakes of West Pomerania (Bucerz, Krzemien, and Kalensko) te size of gonds constitued between 14.63 and 23.16% of the body weight of vendace. Even wider range was determined for Masurian Lakes Dargin, Dobskie, and Kisajno. The mean values of the gonadosomatic index of vendace from lakes of West Pomerania fitted into the above range, however, few specimens from lakes Pile and Pelcz showed low values of gonadosomatic index (GSI < 10%), whereas in a single vendace female from Morynskie Lake the value of the above parameter amounted to more than 30% of the fish body weight |
11.0 percent |
Czeniejewski and Filipiak, 2002 |
| Coregonus clupeaformis |
Female whitefish in Lake Erie habe been calculated to lose approximatively 11% of their weight at spawning |
11.0 percent |
Scott and Crossman, 1973 |
| Hucho hucho |
Mean of 15.5% for different populations |
15.5 percent |
Fleming, 1998 |
| Oncorhynchus gorbuscha |
17.44 ± 1.40 [Spawning grounds] |
17.44 percent |
Dye, 1986 |
| Oncorhynchus gorbuscha |
Mean of 16.8 (range 16.1-17.4%) for different populations |
16.75 percent |
Fleming, 1998 |
| Oncorhynchus keta |
Mean of 14.3, range 14.0 to 16.6 |
14.3 percent |
Bakkala, 1970 |
| Oncorhynchus keta |
Mean of 17.4 for different populations |
17.4 percent |
Fleming, 1998 |
| Oncorhynchus kisutch |
From 22.8 ± 2.6 to 32.5 ± 2.8 [Not specified if maximal values] |
22.8 percent |
Morrison, 1985 |
| Oncorhynchus kisutch |
16.4 ± 4.1 [In May for broodstock population cultured in a fish farm in Southern Chile] and 23.87 ±3.21% |
16.4 percent |
Estay, 1998 |
| Oncorhynchus kisutch |
Mean of 20.7 (range 19.4-24.0) for different populations |
21.7 percent |
Fleming, 1998 |
| Oncorhynchus mykiss |
16.5 ± 0.5 [November to late November] |
16.5 percent |
Bon, 1999 |
| Oncorhynchus mykiss |
20% just prior to ovulation in February |
20.0 percent |
Tyler, 1990 |
| Oncorhynchus mykiss |
10.5 ± 1 [Age 2], 10.7 ± 1.7 [Age 3] and 16.5 ± 1.9 [Age 4] for females sampled |
10.5 percent |
Kato and Kamler, 1983 |
| Oncorhynchus mykiss |
Mean of 14.9 (range 14?5-15.3) for anadromous populations, mean of 14.6 (range 8.3-22.6) for resident populations |
10.15 percent |
Fleming, 1998 |
| Oncorhynchus mykiss |
The mean GSI : early stress = 20.9 +/- 0.8, late stress = 19.9 +/- 0.6, whole-period stress = 21.4 +/- 0.9, controls = 19.8 +/- 0.8 |
20.9 percent |
Contreras-Snachez, 1998 |
| Oncorhynchus nerka |
Average of 16.8 [Kokanee] and 17.4-17.6 [Sockeye] |
17.5 percent |
Kaeriyama, 1995 |
| Oncorhynchus nerka |
Mean of 17.8 for anadromous populations, and 12 (11.4-12.8) for resident population |
12.1 percent |
Fleming, 1998 |
| Oncorhynchus tshawytscha |
From 17.6 to 20.3 [Mean for different populations] |
17.6 percent |
Kinnison, 1998 |
| Oncorhynchus tshawytscha |
Mean of 19, range 17.8-21.1, for different populations |
19.45 percent |
Fleming, 1998 |
| Salmo salar |
25 [Not specified] |
25.0 percent |
Bensettiti and Gaudillat, 2002 |
| Salmo salar |
17% in late March [In Tasmania, 6 months out-of-phase from nothern hemisphere] |
17.0 percent |
King and Pankhurst, 2003 |
| Salmo salar |
Mean of 22.2 (range 20.1-25.7%) for anadromous populations, and Mean of 17.3 (range 17.2-17.4) for resident populations |
22.9 percent |
Fleming, 1998 |
| Salmo trutta fario |
About 22 [October] |
22.0 percent |
Billard, 1987 |
| Salmo trutta fario |
20-22 [September-October] |
21.0 percent |
Bruslé and Quignard, 2001 |
| Salmo trutta fario |
About 20% [mid-october, independent of the distance from the sea to the spawning site] |
20.0 percent |
Jonsson and Jonsson, 2006 |
| Salmo trutta fario |
Mean of 18.5 (range 15-25.4) for anadromous population, mean of 12.9 (range 9.9-15.8) for resident population |
20.2 percent |
Fleming, 1998 |
| Salvelinus alpinus |
18.2 [15 October] |
18.2 percent |
Frantzen, 1997 |
| Salvelinus alpinus |
17.4 [max value observed in October] |
17.4 percent |
Jamet, 1995 |
| Salvelinus alpinus |
In spawning females, there was a definite increase in GSI's throughout August and september, with females immediatly prior to spawning ranging from 20-30%, up to 35.7% |
25.0 percent |
Beddow, 1998 |
| Salvelinus alpinus |
Mature small charr females: 3.2-16.6 (mean 10.1%) and mature large charr 3.8-14.3 (mean 8.4%) |
9.9 percent |
Sparholt, 1985 |
| Salvelinus alpinus |
Mean of 16.4 (range 12.8-18.6%) for anadromous populations, and 18.4 (range 11.9-24.3) for resident populations |
15.7 percent |
Fleming, 1998 |
| Salvelinus fontinalis |
16-18% [Mid-October] |
17.0 percent |
Tam, 1986 |
| Salvelinus fontinalis |
Mean of 9.74, range 9.04 to 12.92 [Not specified] |
9.74 percent |
Vladykov, 1956 |
| Salvelinus fontinalis |
Mean of 10-11% [September/October] |
10.5 percent |
Wydoski and Cooper, 1966 |
| Salvelinus fontinalis |
Maturity indices were higher at 19 and 21 C since these fish did not spawn. The decoded-mean-maturity index (8.6) for female brook tout at 19C was derived from only three fish (0.5, 15.6, and 17.7) on November 7 the female maturity indices were 19.7 at 19°C and 16.2 at 21°C |
19.0 percent |
Hokanson, 1973 |
| Salvelinus fontinalis |
Mean of 13.9 for anadromous populations, and 13.2 (range 10-16.8%) for resident populations |
13.4 percent |
Fleming, 1998 |
| Salvelinus fontinalis |
Mean of 8.37 for acid lakes and 5.73 for non-acid lakes in September |
8.37 percent |
St-Pierre and Moreau, 1986 |
| Salvelinus namaycush |
Mean of 14.6 (range 12.3-17.6%) for different populations |
14.95 percent |
Fleming, 1998 |
| Stenodus leucichthys |
Mean 18.3 but up to 23.5 [First ten day period of August] |
18.3 percent |
Chereshnev, 2000 |
| Stenodus leucichthys |
26.25 ± 2.02 |
26.25 percent |
Kychanov, 1982 |
| Thymallus thymallus |
Mean of 15.7 but up to 18% [The highest GSI values are observed in March and at the beginning of April] |
15.7 percent |
Witkowski, 1989 |
| Ameiurus nebulosus |
5-9 % [Late June] |
7.0 percent |
Rosenblum, 1987 |
| Ameiurus nebulosus |
9.05 [Late May] |
9.05 percent |
Burke, 1984 |
| Ictalurus punctatus |
10.9 [June, July] |
10.9 percent |
Mackenzie, 1989 |
| Ictalurus punctatus |
15.2 [June] |
15.2 percent |
Banks, 1999 |
| Ictalurus punctatus |
15.6 for prespawning females |
15.6 percent |
Grizzle, 1985 |
| Ictalurus punctatus |
15 [GSI usually found in female broodstock] |
15.0 percent |
Legendre, 1997 |
| Ictalurus punctatus |
Mean of 13.8, range 11.0-19.35 [1 July] |
15.175 percent |
Brauhn and McCraren, 1975 |
| Ictalurus punctatus |
5% [In May] |
5.0 percent |
June, 1977 |
| Silurus glanis |
7.5% [Maturation coefficient, measured prior to spawning] |
7.5 percent |
Zholdasova anGuseva, 1987 |
| Silurus glanis |
3-15 [GSI usually found in female broodstock] |
9.0 percent |
Legendre, 1997 |
| Silurus glanis |
4.5% [May] |
4.5 percent |
Alp, 2004 |
| Osmerus eperlanus |
About 18-22% |
20.0 percent |
Belyanina, 1969 |
| Anguilla anguilla |
Gonad weight of mature males only constitutes, at most 14% of the body weight |
14.0 percent |
Vollestad and Jonsson, 1986 |
| Anguilla anguilla |
9.0 ± 1.10% coincide with the onset of spawning migration (treated males) |
9.0 percent |
Amin, 1998 |
| Alosa alosa |
7.5-10% [Not precised] |
8.75 percent |
Bruslé and Quignard, 2001 |
| Alosa alosa |
8.6% |
8.6 percent |
Maitland and Lyle, 2005 |
| Alosa fallax |
11.82 |
11.82 percent |
Maitland and Lyle, 2005 |
| Alosa fallax |
11.4 ± 2.9 |
11.4 percent |
Doherty, 2004 |
| Aphanius iberus |
Mean of 2.0 [Up to 2.6], in May |
2.0 percent |
Vargas and De Sostoa, 1997 |
| Aphanius iberus |
Mean of 0.5 [In April] |
0.5 percent |
Fernandez-Delgado, 1988 |
| Valencia hispanica |
Up to a mean of 1.8 [Up to 2.3] in March |
1.8 percent |
Caiola, 2001 |
| Barbatula barbatula |
1.5-2 [Beginning of the spawning season] |
1.75 percent |
Saat, 2003 |
| Barbatula barbatula |
The weight of testus was seldom more than 2% of the body weight |
2.0 percent |
Smyly, 1955 |
| Cobitis taenia |
2.8 [June-July] |
2.8 percent |
Vaino and Saat, 2003 |
| Cobitis taenia |
About 5 but for GSR which is the gonad weight/total weight minus gonad weight |
5.0 percent |
Marconato and Rasotto, 1989 |
| Cobitis paludica |
1.52% [April-June] |
1.52 percent |
Oliva-Paterna, 2002 |
| Abramis brama |
Up to 6.1% [Calculated without viscera] |
6.1 percent |
Sokolova, 1990 |
| Abramis brama |
Mean of 2.8-3.4 [Up to 4.6] |
3.1 percent |
Backiel and Zawiska, 1968 |
| Abramis brama |
The lowest and highest mean coefficients in males were 0.867 (July 1976, Lake Dabie) and 4.411 (late May, 1976, Lake Dabie) |
0.867 percent |
Kompowski, 1982 |
| Abramis brama |
In spring, the testes accounted for up to 3.7% |
3.7 percent |
Neja and Kompowski, 2001 |
| Alburnoides bipunctatus |
13.4 [In end of May, n= 17] |
13.4 percent |
Yildirim, 1999 |
| Aristichthys nobilis |
1.1 |
1.1 percent |
Schrank and Guy, 2002 |
| Aristichthys nobilis |
1.07 [Not specified if the maximum and when ?] |
1.07 percent |
Belova, 1981 |
| Aspius aspius |
2.02 [April] |
2.02 percent |
Kompowski et Neja, 2004 |
| Barbus barbus |
About 11 [Beginning of June] |
11.0 percent |
Lobon-Cervia and Fernandez-Delgado, 1984 |
| Carassius auratus |
3.2 ±0.4 [May] |
3.2 percent |
Kobayashi, 1986 |
| Ctenopharyngodon idella |
2.27 [Not specified if the maximum and when ?] |
2.27 percent |
Belova, 1981 |
| Cyprinus carpio |
7 |
7.0 percent |
Suquet, 1994 |
| Cyprinus carpio |
6.9 ± 2.6 |
6.9 percent |
Saad and Billard, 1987 |
| Cyprinus carpio |
Range between 10.62 and 11.97 for individuals studied but not specified if the maximum and the date |
10.62 percent |
Belova, 1981 |
| Cyprinus carpio |
Mean of 8.2, up to 9.2 [Beginning of April] |
8.2 percent |
Crivelli, 1981 |
| Cyprinus carpio |
Maximum GSI for males 11% less than in other studies 15% |
11.0 percent |
Dubost, 1997 |
| Cyprinus carpio |
About 7% in March in Australia |
7.0 percent |
Smith and Walker, 2004 |
| Cyprinus carpio |
Recorded estimates are usually around 10% for males |
10.0 percent |
Smith, 2004 |
| Cyprinus carpio |
GSI reaches 16.3 +/- 2.0 for big-belly and 7.0 +/- 0.7% for Gold in November 12 in Israel |
16.3 percent |
Hulata, 1974 |
| Gobio gobio |
2.3 [June, prior to spawning] |
2.3 percent |
Kestemond, 1989 |
| Gobio gobio |
2.3 [During the breeding season] |
2.3 percent |
Rosecchi, 2001 |
| Gobio gobio |
Huge variations between individuals: mostly 1-3% in May |
2.0 percent |
Mann, 1980 |
| Hypophthalmichthys molitrix |
Range between 0.87 and 1.64 but not specified when or if it was maximal values |
0.87 percent |
Belova, 1981 |
| Leuciscus cephalus |
2.77 ± 0.04 % [April] |
2.77 percent |
Guerriero, 2005 |
| Leuciscus cephalus |
2.29 [March] |
2.29 percent |
Sasi, 2003 |
| Leuciscus cephalus |
Most between 2.5-4, some almost 6% [June] |
3.25 percent |
Mann, 1976 |
| Leuciscus cephalus |
Mean 5, range 4-6 [June] |
5.0 percent |
Poncin, 1989 |
| Leuciscus cephalus |
The maximum values for males in May was calculated to be 5.2 |
5.2 percent |
Unver, 1998 |
| Leuciscus cephalus |
Up to 6% |
6.0 percent |
Zelepien, 1997 |
| Leuciscus cephalus |
8.5% [In May] |
8.5 percent |
Erdogan, 2002 |
| Leuciscus idus |
In March-April, the mass of testes accounts for only 1.8% of body weight |
1.8 percent |
Witkowski, 1997 |
| Leuciscus leuciscus |
Average 1.2% |
1.2 percent |
Lobon-cervia, 1996 |
| Leuciscus leuciscus |
Mean 1.5, range 1-2% [November through December] |
1.5 percent |
Mann, 1974 |
| Phoxinus phoxinus |
5.5 [Early May] |
5.5 percent |
Mills, 1987 |
| Phoxinus phoxinus |
4.65% [18-20 May] |
19.0 percent |
Mills and Eloranta, 1985 |
| Pimephales promelas |
1.15 ± 0.02, 1.2 |
1.15 percent |
Jensen, 2001 |
| Pseudorasbora parva |
2.3 [May] |
2.3 percent |
Rosecchi, 2001 |
| Rutilus rutilus |
9 |
9.0 percent |
Suquet, 1994 |
| Rutilus rutilus |
9 [March] |
9.0 percent |
Escaffre and Billard, 1976 |
| Rutilus rutilus |
8-9 [March] |
8.5 percent |
Mann, 1973 |
| Rutilus rutilus |
9.7-11.07, quite constant during the life of male |
10.385 percent |
Papageorgiou, 1979 |
| Rutilus rutilus |
About 7.5% in 2001 and 8% in 2002 [April] |
7.5 percent |
Tarkan, 2006 |
| Rutilus rutilus |
Mean of 4.5, up to 7.5 and even 9% [In March, in Gomishan] and mean of 4, up to 7.5% [In March for Anzali] |
4.5 percent |
Naddafi, 2005 |
| Scardinius erythrophthalmus |
About 7% in 2001 and 9% in 2002 [In May] |
7.0 percent |
Tarkan, 2006 |
| Tinca tinca |
0.66 (July) |
0.66 percent |
Pinillos, 2003 |
| Tinca tinca |
1.6 [June] |
1.6 percent |
Linhart and Billard, 1995 |
| Tinca tinca |
About 1.7 [Beginning og June], based on graph |
1.7 percent |
Kubu and Kouril, 1985 |
| Vimba vimba |
Mean GSI in 14 males was 2.48% (1.68-3.38%) |
2.53 percent |
Lusk, 2005 |
| Gambusia affinis |
3.8 [June to July] |
3.8 percent |
Koya and Iwase, 2004 |
| Esox lucius |
2-3 |
2.5 percent |
Suquet, 1994 |
| Esox lucius |
2-3 [End of October] |
2.5 percent |
Lenhardt, 1992 |
| Esox lucius |
2.5 [Beginning of September then slighlty decline and remain at about 1.5% until spawning] |
2.5 percent |
Billard, 1996 |
| Esox lucius |
2.04 ± 0.78 [From December to April] |
2.04 percent |
Hoffmann, 1980 |
| Esox lucius |
Mean 0.94, range 0.84-1.05 [In L. Kinord], 1.14, range 0.99-1.20 [L. Davan] both in March, 2-4 [Windermere], 2 [Slapton Ley] |
0.945 percent |
Treasurer, 1990 |
| Lota lota |
20.6 [November 26] but up to 25.8% |
20.6 percent |
Brylinska, 2002 |
| Lota lota |
Mean of 11.1, from 9.5-16.0 in December [Coefficient of sexual maturation] |
12.75 percent |
Vedeneev, 2003 |
| Lota lota |
The maturity index of males sharply increases in November to 14.55 |
14.55 percent |
Kirillov, 1989 |
| Gasterosteus aculeatus |
4.8 [April] |
4.8 percent |
Copp, 2002 |
| Gasterosteus aculeatus |
The peak of the GSI is reached in October, about a mean of 1.4, up to 1.6, and is followed by a gradual decline until August when the lowest values are reached |
1.4 percent |
Borg, 1982 |
| Gasterosteus aculeatus |
Around 1 in September than remained around 0.5 the rest of the year |
1.0 percent |
Sokolowska and Sokolowska, 2006 |
| Pungitius pungitius |
7.4-8 [August] |
7.7 percent |
Copp, 2002 |
| Pungitius pungitius |
Based on GSI graph: 1.0 in February |
1.0 percent |
Sokolowska and Skora, 2002 |
| Lepomis gibbosus |
Mean 0.9, up to 1.1% [in June] |
0.9 percent |
Burns, 1976 |
| Micropterus salmoides |
0.87 ± 0,07 (Beginning of April) but also 1,20 for pellet-fed male ( |
0.87 percent |
Rosenblum, 1994 |
| Micropterus salmoides |
Maximal value of GSI for males were 0.85 (unheated) and 0.81 (heated) in March |
0.85 percent |
Bennett and Gibbons, 1975 |
| Micropterus salmoides |
Gonadosomatic index were highest between July and September for male fish, peak in mid-July: about 0.4, range from 0.25 to 1.1 based on Fig 5 (n=309) |
0.4 percent |
Beamish, 2005 |
| Dicentrarchus labrax |
2.5 [March in Arcachon] to 5 [February, Sète] |
2.5 percent |
Zohar, 1984 |
| Dicentrarchus labrax |
2.5 in March [In Arcachon, France], 5% In January [In Sète, France], 5.2 in December [Tunisia] |
2.5 percent |
Barnabé, 1980 |
| Dicentrarchus labrax |
During the second reprodcutive period (third annual cycle), the control group showed higher GSI values (January Ferbaury 2.5-3.0%) than at the first reproductive period |
2.75 percent |
Rodriguez, 2001 |
| Dicentrarchus labrax |
January |
No data |
Gonzalez and Piferrer, 2003 |
| Dicentrarchus labrax |
2.5 [In January] |
2.5 percent |
Rodriguez, 2004 |
| Dicentrarchus labrax |
Mean of 1.5, up to 1.8% [In beginning of February] |
1.5 percent |
Rodriguez, 2005 |
| Morone americana |
4.60 ± 0.31 (April) |
4.6 percent |
Jackson and Sullivan, 1995 |
| Morone chrysops |
Mean 5, up to 7.5 [Mid-May] |
5.0 percent |
Ruelle, 1977 |
| Morone saxatilis |
Mean of 9.5, up to 10.5 [Mid-April] in reared conditions |
9.5 percent |
Holland, 2000 |
| Gymnocephalus cernuus |
7-10 [Average spawning male GSI] |
8.5 percent |
Ogle, 1998 |
| Gymnocephalus cernuus |
In 3 test fish, the coefficient of maturity was 3.74, 4.18 and 4.80 |
3.0 percent |
Butskaya, 1981 |
| Gymnocephalus cernuus |
Male in VI stage, were on average 7.11, range 5.26-12.18 |
8.72 percent |
Neja, 1988 |
| Perca flavescens |
10 [In mid-october] |
10.0 percent |
Heidinger and Kayes, 1986 |
| Perca flavescens |
No value [November] |
No data |
Dabrowski, 1996 |
| Perca flavescens |
5% in September |
5.0 percent |
Tansichuk and Mackay, 1989 |
| Perca fluviatilis |
8.5 ± 1.8 [September] |
8.5 percent |
Sulistyo, 2000 |
| Perca fluviatilis |
6.6-7.1 |
6.85 percent |
Bruslé and Quignard, 2001 |
| Perca fluviatilis |
6.6-7.1 [September-October] |
6.85 percent |
Treasurer and Holliday, 1981 |
| Perca fluviatilis |
About 8% [October] |
8.0 percent |
Le Cren, 1951 |
| Sander lucioperca |
1% |
1.0 percent |
Schlumberger and Proteau, 1991 |
| Sander vitreus |
4.3 [October and stay relatively constant after or slight decrease] |
4.3 percent |
Colby, 1979 |
| Sander vitreus |
Mean 3.2%, up to 3.7% [Prior to spawning, April] |
3.2 percent |
Malison, 1994 |
| Sander vitreus |
4% in August and also 3.3 in April, prior to spawning |
4.0 percent |
Henderson, 1996 |
| Sander vitreus |
Summary statistics for mature adult walleye: mean GSI = 1.87 ± 0.07 [Trout Lake], 2.97 ± 0.12 [Winefred Lake], 1.35 ± 0.06 [Lake Winnipeg], 1.20 ± 0.15 [Lake of the woods], 2.50 ± 0.11 [Lac Beauchêne], 2.05 ± 0.09 [Lake Nipissing], 3.38 ± 0.19 [Lake Ontario] |
1.87 percent |
Moles, 2008 |
| Coregonus lavaretus |
2 [Not specified] |
2.0 percent |
Mack and Billard, 1984 |
| Coregonus lavaretus |
Mean of 2%, up to 2.5% [In September until January, with no significant change during this period] |
2.0 percent |
Fuller, 1976 |
| Coregonus lavaretus |
Mean of 3% [In the end of October] |
3.0 percent |
Heese, 1990 |
| Coregonus albula |
2.35 [End of November], 4.08%[October] |
2.35 percent |
Dlugosz and Worniallo, 1985 |
| Coregonus albula |
Mean of 5.1, range 3.9-6.5 [In December for nominate form] and mean of 4.9, range 3.5-6.1 [In April/May, for deepwater form] |
5.2 percent |
Anwand, 1998 |
| Hucho hucho |
Mean of 3 for different populations |
3.0 percent |
Fleming, 1998 |
| Oncorhynchus gorbuscha |
Mean of 5.2 (range 4.9-5.4%) for different populations |
5.15 percent |
Fleming, 1998 |
| Oncorhynchus keta |
Mean of 3.7 (range 3.2-4.1%) |
3.65 percent |
Fleming, 1998 |
| Oncorhynchus kisutch |
From 4.3 ± 0.3 to 6.1 ± 0.2 [Not specified if maximal values] |
4.3 percent |
Morrison, 1985 |
| Oncorhynchus kisutch |
8.4 ± 0.8% [For broodstock population cultured in fish farm in southern Chile] |
8.4 percent |
Estay, 1998 |
| Oncorhynchus kisutch |
Mean of 5.8% (range 5.2-6.4) for different populations |
5.8 percent |
Fleming, 1998 |
| Oncorhynchus mykiss |
10 |
10.0 percent |
Suquet, 1994 |
| Oncorhynchus mykiss |
Peaked in October 5.4 ± 0.8, then declined in November |
5.4 percent |
Ya-yi, 2001 |
| Oncorhynchus mykiss |
Mean of 5 for resident population |
5.0 percent |
Fleming, 1998 |
| Oncorhynchus nerka |
Mean of 3.0 (range 2.1-3.4%) for anadromous populations, and Mean of 2.7 (range 2.6-2.8) for resident populations |
2.75 percent |
Fleming, 1998 |
| Oncorhynchus tshawytscha |
Mean of 6.1 (range 5.4-6.7%) |
6.05 percent |
Fleming, 1998 |
| Salmo salar |
Mean of 4.1 (range 2.3-5.8%) for anadromous populations, and Mean of 8.0 (range 4.7-10) for mature male parr |
4.05 percent |
Fleming, 1998 |
| Salmo trutta fario |
6 |
6.0 percent |
Suquet, 1994 |
| Salmo trutta fario |
5-6 |
5.5 percent |
Billard, 1987 |
| Salmo trutta fario |
4-5 [i.e. 1/5 or 1/7 of the RGS of female] |
4.5 percent |
Bruslé and Quignard, 2001 |
| Salmo trutta fario |
Mean of 2.9 (range 2.7-3.0) for anadromous population, mean of 2.3 (range 1.9-2.6) for resident population |
2.85 percent |
Fleming, 1998 |
| Salvelinus alpinus |
4.2 (max value in September) |
4.2 percent |
Jamet, 1995 |
| Salvelinus alpinus |
1.3-6.1 [End of September] |
3.7 percent |
Beddow, 1998 |
| Salvelinus alpinus |
Mature small charr males: 3.2-12.5 (mean 7.1%) and mature large charr 1.3-4.8 (mean 2.4%) |
7.85 percent |
Sparholt, 1985 |
| Salvelinus alpinus |
Mean of 4.4 for anadromous populations (mean of 6.7% for mature male parr) and 2.8 for resident populations |
4.4 percent |
Fleming, 1998 |
| Salvelinus fontinalis |
Mean of 2.9 and 3.4 at 19 and 21°C respectively [November] |
2.9 percent |
Hokanson, 1973 |
| Salvelinus fontinalis |
Between 1.5 and 2% [August/September] |
1.5 percent |
Wydoski and Cooper, 1966 |
| Salvelinus fontinalis |
Mean of 1.5 for resident populations |
1.5 percent |
Fleming, 1998 |
| Salvelinus fontinalis |
Mean of 2.78 for acid lakes and 2.50 for non-acid lakes in September |
2.78 percent |
St-Pierre and Moreau, 1986 |
| Salvelinus namaycush |
Mean of 3.1 for different population |
3.1 percent |
Fleming, 1998 |
| Stenodus leucichthys |
2.72 ± 0.08 |
2.72 percent |
Kychanov, 1982 |
| Thymallus thymallus |
Mean 1.63, up to 2 [September] |
1.63 percent |
Witkowski, 1989 |
| Ameiurus nebulosus |
0.35 (Late June) |
0.35 percent |
Rosenblum, 1987 |
| Ameiurus nebulosus |
0.218 (Mid-May until End of June) |
0.218 percent |
Burke, 1984 |
| Ameiurus nebulosus |
0.22 |
0.22 percent |
Burke and Leatherland, 1984 |
| Ictalurus punctatus |
0.3 |
0.3 percent |
Suquet, 1994 |
| Ictalurus punctatus |
Averages 0.88 during July and 0.69 during November |
0.88 percent |
Grizzle, 1985 |
| Ictalurus punctatus |
In captivity GSI reaches 0.25 |
0.25 percent |
Legendre, 1997 |
| Silurus glanis |
May reach 0.94%, but mean is 0.38% |
0.94 percent |
Zholdasova and Guseva, 1987 |
| Silurus glanis |
In captivity GSI reaches 1-1.5% |
1.25 percent |
Legendre, 1997 |
| Silurus glanis |
0.2 [May] |
0.2 percent |
Alp, 2004 |
| Osmerus eperlanus |
About 5 |
5.0 percent |
Belyanina, 1969 |